Dawn M Upchurch1, Evan A Krueger2, Richard G Wight2. 1. Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: upchurch@ucla.edu. 2. Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) young adults experience a wide range of health disparities, compared to heterosexuals. However, LGBs also experience many barriers to conventional health care, including social stigma, lack of LGB-specific knowledge among providers, and lower rates of health insurance coverage, which may limit utilization of conventional health services. Complementary health approaches (CHA) may represent an alternative to conventional care, but very little is currently known about CHA use in this population. We examined whether and how LGB young adults differed from heterosexual young adults in use of CHA. METHODS: Data were from Wave III of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (2001-2002). Fifteen types of CHA were considered. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed using design-based F tests, and logistic regression was used. Analyses were weighted and gender stratified. RESULTS: Almost 46% of gay/bisexual men used CHA in the past 12 months versus 26% of heterosexual men (p ≤ .001) and 50% of lesbian/bisexual women versus 30% of heterosexual women (p ≤ .001). LGBs also differed significantly on demographics, access to conventional care, and health behaviors. Multivariate results showed higher odds of CHA among LGBs relative to heterosexuals (adjusted odds ratio = 2.37 for men; adjusted odds ratio = 1.98 for women; both p ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to systematically demonstrate sexual orientation differences in CHA in a nationally representative sample of young adults. Public health wellness initiatives for sexual minorities should include evidence-based CHA in addition to conventional health services.
PURPOSE: Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) young adults experience a wide range of health disparities, compared to heterosexuals. However, LGBs also experience many barriers to conventional health care, including social stigma, lack of LGB-specific knowledge among providers, and lower rates of health insurance coverage, which may limit utilization of conventional health services. Complementary health approaches (CHA) may represent an alternative to conventional care, but very little is currently known about CHA use in this population. We examined whether and how LGB young adults differed from heterosexual young adults in use of CHA. METHODS: Data were from Wave III of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (2001-2002). Fifteen types of CHA were considered. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed using design-based F tests, and logistic regression was used. Analyses were weighted and gender stratified. RESULTS: Almost 46% of gay/bisexual men used CHA in the past 12 months versus 26% of heterosexual men (p ≤ .001) and 50% of lesbian/bisexual women versus 30% of heterosexual women (p ≤ .001). LGBs also differed significantly on demographics, access to conventional care, and health behaviors. Multivariate results showed higher odds of CHA among LGBs relative to heterosexuals (adjusted odds ratio = 2.37 for men; adjusted odds ratio = 1.98 for women; both p ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to systematically demonstrate sexual orientation differences in CHA in a nationally representative sample of young adults. Public health wellness initiatives for sexual minorities should include evidence-based CHA in addition to conventional health services.
Authors: Michael P Marshal; Mark S Friedman; Ron Stall; Kevin M King; Jonathan Miles; Melanie A Gold; Oscar G Bukstein; Jennifer Q Morse Journal: Addiction Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Richard L Nahin; James M Dahlhamer; Beth L Taylor; Patricia M Barnes; Barbara J Stussman; Catherine M Simile; Marc R Blackman; Margaret A Chesney; Morgan Jackson; Heather Miller; Kim K McFann Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-08-27 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Joel G Anderson; Marissa Bartmess; Jennifer M Jabson Tree; Jason D Flatt Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 2.579