Literature DB >> 23681866

Performance at MRCP(UK): when should trainees sit examinations?

C Pinheiro-Torres1, P Tang, J Dacre.   

Abstract

This paper analyses candidate performance in the three components of the MRCP(UK) examination to establish when they are most likely to pass. Using data from the 2010 and 2011 MRCP(UK) examinations, pass rates of candidates who gained their primary medical qualification (PMQ) in 2005 or later were analysed. Results from a total of 22,827 candidates were included in the study: 12,517 (54.8%) from Part 1, 5,545 (24.3%) from Part 2 written and 4,765 (20.9%) from the Part 2 practical assessment of clinical examination skills (PACES). The results show that candidates are more likely to pass Part 1 and Part 2 written 12-24 months after graduation and to pass Part 2 PACES 25-36 months after graduation. When we consider the training programme for physicians in the UK, successful candidates are likely to be in foundation programmes or early core or specialty training when they achieve success. At the moment, some candidates are dissuaded from taking the examination during their foundation programme, but our data show that their likelihood of success is highest during this period of training. The analysis also shows that for candidates who fail their first attempt, delaying their next attempt by one diet significantly increases the likelihood of them passing at their next attempt.

Keywords:  MRCP(UK); examination pass rates; foundation trainees; medical training

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23681866      PMCID: PMC4952634          DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-2-166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  8 in total

1.  Academic and non-academic predictors of success on the Nottingham undergraduate medical course 1970-1995.

Authors:  D James; C Chilvers
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Disorganized junior doctors fail the MRCP (UK).

Authors:  Adrian G Stanley; Khalid M Khan; Walayat Hussain; Michael Tweed
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  How to pass the MRCP (UK) examination--ask a successful candidate!

Authors:  R Salter; S Smith
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  The impact of nonacademic variables on performance at two medical schools.

Authors:  C T Webb; W Sedlacek; D Cohen; P Shields; E Gracely; M Hawkins; L Nieman
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Learning styles and approaches: implications for medical education.

Authors:  D I Newble; N J Entwistle
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Resitting a high-stakes postgraduate medical examination on multiple occasions: nonlinear multilevel modelling of performance in the MRCP(UK) examinations.

Authors:  I C McManus; Katarzyna Ludka
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Graduates of different UK medical schools show substantial differences in performance on MRCP(UK) Part 1, Part 2 and PACES examinations.

Authors:  I C McManus; Andrew T Elder; Andre de Champlain; Jane E Dacre; Jennifer Mollon; Liliana Chis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Performance in the MRCP(UK) Examination 2003-4: analysis of pass rates of UK graduates in relation to self-declared ethnicity and gender.

Authors:  Neil G Dewhurst; Chris McManus; Jennifer Mollon; Jane E Dacre; Allister J Vale
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 8.775

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Predictors of success in the Intercollegiate Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examination.

Authors:  Dsg Scrimgeour; J Cleland; A J Lee; P A Brennan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 1.891

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.