Literature DB >> 23681508

Uncertainty reduction as a measure of cognitive load in sentence comprehension.

Stefan L Frank1.   

Abstract

The entropy-reduction hypothesis claims that the cognitive processing difficulty on a word in sentence context is determined by the word's effect on the uncertainty about the sentence. Here, this hypothesis is tested more thoroughly than has been done before, using a recurrent neural network for estimating entropy and self-paced reading for obtaining measures of cognitive processing load. Results show a positive relation between reading time on a word and the reduction in entropy due to processing that word, supporting the entropy-reduction hypothesis. Although this effect is independent from the effect of word surprisal, we find no evidence that these two measures correspond to cognitively distinct processes.
Copyright © 2013 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Keywords:  Cognitive load; Entropy reduction; Recurrent neural network; Self-paced reading; Sentence comprehension; Surprisal; Word information

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23681508     DOI: 10.1111/tops.12025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  12 in total

1.  The Paradox of Abstraction: Precision Versus Concreteness.

Authors:  Rumen Iliev; Robert Axelrod
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-06

2.  Quasi-compositional mapping from form to meaning: a neural network-based approach to capturing neural responses during human language comprehension.

Authors:  Milena Rabovsky; James L McClelland
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Grounding the neurobiology of language in first principles: The necessity of non-language-centric explanations for language comprehension.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Giovanna Egidi; Marco Marelli; Roel M Willems
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-07-24

4.  Lexical Predictability During Natural Reading: Effects of Surprisal and Entropy Reduction.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Wonil Choi; Fernanda Ferreira; John M Henderson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-02-14

5.  Semantic Context Enhances the Early Auditory Encoding of Natural Speech.

Authors:  Michael P Broderick; Andrew J Anderson; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Using information-theoretic measures to characterize the structure of the writing system: the case of orthographic-phonological regularities in English.

Authors:  Noam Siegelman; Devin M Kearns; Jay G Rueckl
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-06

8.  Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective.

Authors:  Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Using stochastic language models (SLM) to map lexical, syntactic, and phonological information processing in the brain.

Authors:  Alessandro Lopopolo; Stefan L Frank; Antal van den Bosch; Roel M Willems
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hierarchical structure guides rapid linguistic predictions during naturalistic listening.

Authors:  Jonathan R Brennan; John T Hale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.