| Literature DB >> 23680335 |
Shu-Jing Gao1, Yu-Ying He, Yu-Jiang Liu, Guo-Jing Yang, Xiao-Nong Zhou.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis japonica, caused by infection with Schistosoma japonicum, is still recognized as a major public health problem in the Peoples' Republic of China. Mathematical modelling of schistosomiasis transmission has been undertaken in order to assess and project the effects of various control strategies for elimination of the disease. Seasonal fluctuations in transmission may have the potential to impact on the population dynamics of schistosomiasis, yet no model of S. japonicum has considered such effects. In this paper, we characterize the transmission dynamics of S. japonicum using a modified version of Barbour's model to account for seasonal variation (SV), and investigate the effectiveness of the control strategy adopted in Liaonan village of Xingzi county, Jiangxi Province.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23680335 PMCID: PMC3667069 DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-141
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Interpretation of model (1.1) from Barbour (1996)[41]
| (1.1) | |
| the prevalence of infection in the definitive host population | |
| the proportion of infected snails | |
| the rate of incidence for a single definitive host at unit density of infected snails | |
| the rate at which an infected definitive host causes snail infections | |
| the recovery rate for definitive host infections | |
| ∆ | the density of snails |
| Σ | the density of definitive hosts |
| per capita death rate of infected snails |
Model of force of infection with and as composite parameters
| (From 1.1) | |
| (From 1.1) |
The data for, andfrom annual report data in Liaonan village, Xingzi county, Jiangxi Province, P. R. China
| 28.0 | 33.9 | 91.5 | 133.5 | 41.1 | 17.5 | 11.3 | 2.4 | |
| 0.030 | 0.020 | 0.048 | 0.017 | 0.031 | 0.018 | 0.031 | 0.018 | |
| 0.0671 | 0.0533 | 0.0631 | 0.0454 | 0.0454 | 0.0454 | 0.0453 | 0.0457 | |
| 0.00021 | 0.00005 | 0.00013 | 0.00014 | 0.00018 | 0.00050 | 0.00077 | 0.00002 |
Note: Δ means the density of snails, Σ means the density of definitive hosts, means the average prevalence of infection in hosts in one year, means the average prevalence of infection in snails in one year.
The calculated values of composite parameters and from Model 1.1
| 0.0085 | 0.0226 | 0.0038 | 0.0017 | 0.0044 | 0.0037 | 0.0037 | 0.0088 | |
| 0.0157 | 0.0088 | 0.0224 | 0.1344 | 0.0287 | 0.0598 | 0.0341 | 0.0254 |
Note: a refers the infection rate at which an infected snail makes an susceptible definitive host to be infected per unit time (1 day) and per square meter waters, b refers the rate at which an infected definitive host causes the snail population to be infected per unit time (1 day) and per square meter waters.
Numerical results for the annual basic reproduction ratio values according to Models 1.1 and 2.1
| 1.0705 | 1.0582 | 1.0811 | 1.0202 | 1.0433 | 1.0531 | 1.0424 | 1.0519 | |
| 1.0890 | 1.0729 | 1.0843 | 1.0642 | 1.0642 | 1.0646 | 1.0648 | 1.0660 |
Note: R′0 corresponds to the original Barbour’s model (1.1), R0corresponds to the seasonal variation (SV)-modified Barbour’s model (2.1).
Figure 1Changes in the basic reproduction ratio in the Liaonan village from 2003 to 2010.
Figure 2The relationship between , and . The graph demonstrates the sensitivity of the basic reproduction ratio to the changes of composite parameters a and b.