Literature DB >> 23679190

The development and validation of a brief Quality of Sexual Experience (QSE) scale: results from a nationally representative sample of men and women in the United States.

Stephanie A Sanders1, Debby Herbenick, Michael Reece, Vanessa Schick, Margo Mullinax, Brian Dodge, J Dennis Fortenberry.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Much scientific research focuses on assessing and understanding individuals' perceptions of sexual pleasure, enjoyment and satisfaction. Many existing measures of pleasure and satisfaction provide valuable information but are limited in their ability to assess event-level quality. AIMS: To develop a scale for measuring the event-level quality of a sexual experience that could be used regardless of the age, gender, sexual orientation, and relationship status of the individual and across sexual activity types.
METHODS: Interviews about the measurement of sexual quality and pleasure were conducted with 15 experts in the field of sexual health and informed the development of an event-level scale to measure the quality of sexual experiences. Scale items were administered to a cross-sectional nationally representative probability survey of Americans ages 18 to 60. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Socio-demographic items; Quality of Sexual Experience (QSE) scale items; event-level items related to overall sexual quality ("Quality item"), comparison to other sexual events ("Comparison item"), and orgasm ("Orgasm item").
RESULTS: QSE scores were significantly correlated with responses to the Quality Item (r=0.901, P<0.001 for both women and men). Better experiences were associated with significantly higher QSE scores than were worse experiences; significant linear relationships were found for both women (GLM F[4,1461]=129.46, P<0.001) and men (GLM F[4,864]=71.84, P<0.001). QSE scores were significantly related to responses on the Orgasm Item for women [F[3,1430]=246.53, P<0.001] and men [F[3,858]=117.24, P<0.001].
CONCLUSIONS: The QSE scale is a valid and reliable event-level measure of the quality of a sexual experience in both women and men with outstanding psychometric properties. Clinical and research implications are discussed.
© 2013 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Quality of Sexual Experience; Sexual Function; Sexual Pleasure

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23679190     DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  8 in total

1.  Validation of an Event-Level, Male Sexual Pleasure Scale (EMSEXpleasure) Among Condom-Using Men in the U.S.

Authors:  Aaron J Siegler; Elizabeth Boos; Eli S Rosenberg; Michael P Cecil; Patrick S Sullivan
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2018-02-01

2.  Measures of Attitudes Toward and Communication about Condom Use: Their Relationships With Sexual Risk Behavior Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Men.

Authors:  Richard A Crosby; Cynthia A Graham; William L Yarber; Stephanie A Sanders; Robin R Milhausen; Leandro Mena
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Effects of a Novel Erectogenic Condom on Men and Women's Sexual Pleasure: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  M F Gallo; N C Nguyen; A Luff; T N Luong; V T Le; J Casterline; R Andridge
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2022-01-21

4.  Event-level impact of Promescent on quality of sexual experience in men with subjective premature ejaculation.

Authors:  K P Mark; I Kerner
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.896

5.  The 'Pleasure&Pregnancy' web-based interactive educational programme versus expectant management in the treatment of unexplained subfertility: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Eline A F Dancet; Thomas M D'Hooghe; Felicia Dreischor; Madelon van Wely; Ellen T M Laan; Cornelius B Lambalk; Sjoerd Repping; Inge M Custers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Mapping the Perceived Sexuality of Heterosexual Men and Women in Mid- and Later Life: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Ashley Macleod; Lucy Busija; Marita McCabe
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.491

7.  Feasibility of an External Erectile Prosthesis for Transgender Men Who have Undergone Phalloplasty.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Boskey; Divya Jolly; Geetika Mehra; Oren Ganor
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.523

8.  What Influences Coital Frequency Among Chinese Men?: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Yali Xiang; Jingxuan Peng; Jianfu Yang; Yuxin Tang; Dongjie Li
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.491

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.