OBJECTIVES: We examined whether people moving into a housing development designed according to a state government livable neighborhoods subdivision code engage in more walking than do people who move to other types of developments. METHODS: In a natural experiment of 1813 people building homes in 73 new housing developments in Perth, Western Australia, we surveyed participants before and then 12 and 36 months after moving. We measured self-reported walking using the Neighborhood Physical Activity Questionnaire and collected perceptions of the environment and self-selection factors. We calculated objective measures of the built environment using a Geographic Information System. RESULTS: After relocation, participants in livable versus conventional developments had greater street connectivity, residential density, land use mix, and access to destinations and more positive perceptions of their neighborhood (all P < .05). However, there were no significant differences in walking over time by type of development (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the Livable Neighborhoods Guidelines produced more supportive environments; however, the level of intervention was insufficient to encourage more walking. Evaluations of new urban planning policies need to incorporate longer term follow-up to allow time for new neighborhoods to develop.
OBJECTIVES: We examined whether people moving into a housing development designed according to a state government livable neighborhoods subdivision code engage in more walking than do people who move to other types of developments. METHODS: In a natural experiment of 1813 people building homes in 73 new housing developments in Perth, Western Australia, we surveyed participants before and then 12 and 36 months after moving. We measured self-reported walking using the Neighborhood Physical Activity Questionnaire and collected perceptions of the environment and self-selection factors. We calculated objective measures of the built environment using a Geographic Information System. RESULTS: After relocation, participants in livable versus conventional developments had greater street connectivity, residential density, land use mix, and access to destinations and more positive perceptions of their neighborhood (all P < .05). However, there were no significant differences in walking over time by type of development (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the Livable Neighborhoods Guidelines produced more supportive environments; however, the level of intervention was insufficient to encourage more walking. Evaluations of new urban planning policies need to incorporate longer term follow-up to allow time for new neighborhoods to develop.
Authors: Billie Giles-Corti; Anna Timperio; Hayley Cutt; Terri J Pikora; Fiona C L Bull; Matthew Knuiman; Max Bulsara; Kimberly Van Niel; Trevor Shilton Journal: Prev Med Date: 2006-03-30 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Lindsay M Braun; Daniel A Rodríguez; Kelly R Evenson; Jana A Hirsch; Kari A Moore; Ana V Diez Roux Journal: Health Place Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Jana A Hirsch; Ana V Diez Roux; Kari A Moore; Kelly R Evenson; Daniel A Rodriguez Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Lindsay M Braun; Daniel A Rodriguez; Yan Song; Katie A Meyer; Cora E Lewis; Jared P Reis; Penny Gordon-Larsen Journal: J Transp Health Date: 2016-09-13