Literature DB >> 2367664

Patellar cartilage lesions: in vitro detection and staging with MR imaging and pathologic correlation.

C W Hayes1, R W Sawyer, W F Conway.   

Abstract

Fourteen freshly disarticulated knee specimens were studied to assess the usefulness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection and correct staging of patellar chondral lesions. Axial and sagittal images were obtained; T1-weighted spin-echo sequences were found satisfactory for defining cartilage morphology. Specimens were sectioned and examined grossly for cartilage changes such as softening, blistering, fibrillation, fissuring, and frank subchondral bone exposure. In a side-by-side comparison, all lesions classified grossly in the Shahriaree system as stage II or higher showed MR changes. Stage I changes could not be identified in disarticulated specimens. Stage III lesions showed cartilage irregularity (ulceration) or a loss of the normal, sharply defined margin between coapted cartilage, which represented "crabmeat" fibrillation. Stage IV lesions showed ulceration to bone, sometimes with subchondral bone changes. In this in vitro, preliminary study, MR imaging was found to be an accurate means for detecting and staging moderate and advanced patellar cartilage lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2367664     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.176.2.2367664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  17 in total

1.  Bone scintigraphy in chronic knee pain: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  T Boegård; O Rudling; J Dahlström; H Dirksen; I F Petersson; K Jonsson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  "Long-term results after microfracture treatment for full-thickness knee chondral lesions in athletes" Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2014) 22:1986-1996 DOI 10.1007/s00167-013-2676-8.

Authors:  Nael Hawi; Carl Haasper
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Thickness of patellofemoral articular cartilage as measured on MR imaging: sequence comparison of accuracy, reproducibility, and interobserver variation.

Authors:  M D van Leersum; M E Schweitzer; F Gannon; S Vinitski; G Finkel; D G Mitchell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Osteoarthritis and magnetic resonance imaging: potential and problems.

Authors:  C W Hutton; W Vennart
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Popliteal cysts and associated disorders of the knee. Critical review with MR imaging.

Authors:  V Sansone; A de Ponti; G M Paluello; A del Maschio
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  MRI of the knee: its cost-effective use in a district general hospital.

Authors:  H R Chissell; R L Allum; A Keightley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Correlation between radiographically diagnosed osteophytes and magnetic resonance detected cartilage defects in the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  T Boegård; O Rudling; I F Petersson; K Jonsson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the diagnosis of patellar cartilage lesions: a prospective study.

Authors:  J A Vallotton; R A Meuli; P F Leyvraz; M Landry
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the femoral trochlea: evaluation of anatomical landmarks and grading articular cartilage in cadaveric knees.

Authors:  Claus Muhle; Joong Mo Ahn; Debra Trudell; Donald Resnick
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The morphology of articular cartilage assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Reproducibility and anatomical correlation.

Authors:  F Eckstein; H Sittek; S Milz; R Putz; M Reiser
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.