Literature DB >> 23675793

A novel experimental knee-pain model affects perceived pain and movement biomechanics.

Matthew K Seeley1, Jihong Park, Daniel King, J Ty Hopkins.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Knee injuries are prevalent, and the associated knee pain is linked to disability. The influence of knee pain on movement biomechanics, independent of other factors related to knee injuries, is difficult to study and unclear.
OBJECTIVE: (1) To evaluate a novel experimental knee-pain model and (2) better understand the independent effects of knee pain on walking and running biomechanics.
DESIGN: Crossover study.
SETTING: Biomechanics laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Twelve able-bodied volunteers (age = 23 ± 3 years, height = 1.73 ± 0.09 m, mass = 75 ± 14 kg). INTERVENTION(S): Participants walked and ran at 3 time intervals (preinfusion, infusion, and postinfusion) for 3 experimental conditions (control, sham, and pain). During the infusion time interval for the pain and sham conditions, hypertonic or isotonic saline, respectively, was continuously infused into the right infrapatellar fat pad for 22 minutes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We used repeated-measures analyses of variance to evaluate the effects of time and condition on (1) perceived knee pain and (2) key biomechanical characteristics (ground reaction forces, and joint kinematics and kinetics) of walking and running (P < .05).
RESULTS: The hypertonic saline infusion (1) increased perceived knee pain throughout the infusion and (2) reduced discrete characteristics of each component of the walking ground reaction force, walking peak plantar-flexion angle (range = 62°-67°), walking peak plantar-flexion moment (range = 95-104 N·m), walking peak knee-extension moment (range = 36-49 N·m), walking peak hip-abduction moment (range = 62-73 N·m), walking peak support moment (range = 178-207 N·m), running peak plantar-flexion angle (range = 38°-77°), and running peak hip-adduction angle (range = 5-21°).
CONCLUSIONS: This novel experimental knee pain model consistently increased perceived pain during various human movements and produced altered running and walking biomechanics that may cause abnormal knee joint-loading patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23675793      PMCID: PMC3655747          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.2.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  44 in total

1.  Knee pain in older adults: the latest musculoskeletal "epidemic".

Authors:  D P Symmons
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Cost effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young adults.

Authors:  C A Gottlob; C L Baker; J M Pellissier; L Colvin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Individual muscle contributions to support in normal walking.

Authors:  Frank C Anderson; Marcus G Pandy
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Fitting of mathematical functions to biomechanical data.

Authors:  K M Jackson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Overall principle of lower limb support during stance phase of gait.

Authors:  D A Winter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Thin-fibre receptors responding to mechanical, chemical, and thermal stimulation in the skeletal muscle of the dog.

Authors:  T Kumazawa; K Mizumura
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Experimental knee pain reduces muscle strength.

Authors:  Marius Henriksen; Sara Rosager; Jens Aaboe; Thomas Graven-Nielsen; Henning Bliddal
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 5.820

8.  Cartilage atrophy in the knees of patients after seven weeks of partial load bearing.

Authors:  S Hinterwimmer; M Krammer; M Krötz; C Glaser; R Baumgart; M Reiser; F Eckstein
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-08

9.  The nature of anterior knee pain following injection of hypertonic saline into the infrapatellar fat pad.

Authors:  Kim Bennell; Paul Hodges; Rebecca Mellor; Catharina Bexander; Tina Souvlis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Bilateral kinematic and kinetic analysis of the squat exercise after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  George J Salem; Ruben Salinas; F Victor Harding
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  10 in total

1.  Acute Responses of Strength and Running Mechanics to Increasing and Decreasing Pain in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain.

Authors:  David M Bazett-Jones; Wendy Huddleston; Stephen Cobb; Kristian O'Connor; Jennifer E Earl-Boehm
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Influence of remote pain on movement control and muscle endurance during repetitive movements.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Cowley; Deanna H Gates
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sagittal plane walking biomechanics in individuals with knee osteoarthritis after quadriceps strengthening.

Authors:  H C Davis; B A Luc-Harkey; M K Seeley; J Troy Blackburn; B Pietrosimone
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Bilateral Gait 6 and 12 Months Post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Compared with Controls.

Authors:  Hope C Davis-Wilson; Steven J Pfeiffer; Christopher D Johnston; Matthew K Seeley; Matthew S Harkey; J Troy Blackburn; Ryan P Fockler; Jeffrey T Spang; Brian Pietrosimone
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2020-04

5.  Walking Ground Reaction Force Post-ACL Reconstruction: Analysis of Time and Symptoms.

Authors:  Brian Pietrosimone; Matthew K Seeley; Christopher Johnston; Steven J Pfeiffer; Jeffery T Spang; J Troy Blackburn
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2019-02

6.  Synovial fluid concentrations of matrix Metalloproteinase-3 and Interluekin-6 following anterior cruciate ligament injury associate with gait biomechanics 6 months following reconstruction.

Authors:  A Evans-Pickett; L Longobardi; J T Spang; R A Creighton; G Kamath; H C Davis-Wilson; R Loeser; J T Blackburn; B Pietrosimone
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 7.507

7.  Promising Effect of Visually-Assisted Motor Imagery Against Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition - A Human Experimental Pain Study.

Authors:  Shota Oda; Masashi Izumi; Shogo Takaya; Nobuaki Tadokoro; Koji Aso; Kristian Kjær Petersen; Masahiko Ikeuchi
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  Gait Adaptation to a Phase-Specific Nociceptive Electrical Stimulation Applied at the Ankle: A Model to Study Musculoskeletal-Like Pain.

Authors:  Michaël Bertrand-Charette; Renaud Jeffrey-Gauthier; Jean-Sébastien Roy; Laurent J Bouyer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Functional vs. Traditional Analysis in Biomechanical Gait Data: An Alternative Statistical Approach.

Authors:  Jihong Park; Matthew K Seeley; Devin Francom; C Shane Reese; J Ty Hopkins
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  Quadriceps neuromuscular function in women with patellofemoral pain: Influences of the type of the task and the level of pain.

Authors:  Ronaldo Valdir Briani; Danilo De Oliveira Silva; Carolina Silva Flóride; Fernando Amâncio Aragão; Carlos Eduardo de Albuquerque; Fernando Henrique Magalhães; Fábio Mícolis de Azevedo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.