Literature DB >> 23672971

Risk factors for incident myopia in Australian schoolchildren: the Sydney adolescent vascular and eye study.

Amanda N French1, Ian G Morgan, Paul Mitchell, Kathryn A Rose.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the risk factors for incident myopia in Australian schoolchildren.
DESIGN: Population-based, longitudinal cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The Sydney Adolescent Vascular and Eye Study (SAVES) was a 5- to 6-year follow-up of the Sydney Myopia Study (SMS). At follow-up, 2103 children were reexamined: 892 (50.5%) from the younger cohort and 1211 (51.5%) from the older cohort. Of these, 863 in the younger cohort and 1196 in the older cohort had complete refraction data.
METHODS: Cycloplegic autorefraction (cyclopentolate 1%; Canon RK-F1; Canon, Tokyo, Japan) was measured at baseline and follow-up. Myopia was defined as a spherical equivalent refraction of ≤-0.50 diopters (D). Children were classified as having incident myopia if they were nonmyopic at baseline and myopic in either eye at follow-up. A comprehensive questionnaire determined the amount of time children spent outdoors and doing near work per week at baseline, as well as ethnicity, parental myopia, and socioeconomic status. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incident myopia.
RESULTS: Children who became myopic spent less time outdoors compared with children who remained nonmyopic (younger cohort, 16.3 vs. 21.0 hours, respectively, P<0.0001; older cohort, 17.2 vs. 19.6 hours, respectively, P=0.001). Children who became myopic performed significantly more near work (19.4 vs. 17.6 hours; P=0.02) in the younger cohort, but not in the older cohort (P=0.06). Children with 1 or 2 parents who were myopic had greater odds of incident myopia (1 parent: odds ratio [OR], 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-5.2; both parents: OR, 3.3, 95% CI, 1.6-6.8) in the younger but not the older cohort. Children of East Asian ethnicity had a higher incidence of myopia compared with children of European Caucasian ethnicity (both P<0.0001) and spent less time outdoors (both P<0.0001). A less hyperopic refraction at baseline was the most significant predictor of incident myopia. The addition of time outdoors, near work, parental myopia, and ethnicity to the model significantly improved the predictive power (P<0.0001) in the younger cohort but had little effect in the older cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Time spent outdoors was negatively associated with incident myopia in both age cohorts. Near work and parental myopia were additional significant risk factors for myopia only in the younger cohort. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23672971     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  94 in total

1.  Early life factors for myopia in the British Twins Early Development Study.

Authors:  Katie M Williams; Eva Kraphol; Ekaterina Yonova-Doing; Pirro G Hysi; Robert Plomin; Christopher J Hammond
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Seasonal variations in the progression of myopia in children enrolled in the correction of myopia evaluation trial.

Authors:  Jane Gwiazda; Li Deng; Ruth Manny; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  Epidemiology of myopia.

Authors:  P J Foster; Y Jiang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Assessment of eye length changes in accommodation using dynamic extended-depth OCT.

Authors:  Yu-Cherng Chang; Keke Liu; Carolina de Freitas; Alex Pham; Florence Cabot; Siobhan Williams; Ethan Adre; Giovanni Gregori; Marco Ruggeri; Sonia H Yoo; Arthur Ho; Jean-Marie Parel; Fabrice Manns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 5.  The measurement of time spent outdoors in child myopia research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Xian-Gui He; Xun Xu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Validation of the Clouclip and utility in measuring viewing distance in adults.

Authors:  Khob R Bhandari; Lisa A Ostrin
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Preventing Myopia.

Authors:  Wolf A Lagrèze; Frank Schaeffel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Association between parental myopia and the risk of myopia in a child.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhang; Xinhua Qu; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Myopia prevalence in Canadian school children: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mike Yang; Doerte Luensmann; Desmond Fonn; Jill Woods; Debbie Jones; Keith Gordon; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  The influence of near work on myopic refractive change in urban students in Beijing: a three-year follow-up report.

Authors:  Zhong Lin; Balamurali Vasudevan; Guang Yun Mao; Kenneth J Ciuffreda; Vishal Jhanji; Xiao Xia Li; Hong Jia Zhou; Ning Li Wang; Yuan Bo Liang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.