Literature DB >> 23672421

Utilization of frozen plasma in Ontario: a provincewide audit reveals a high rate of inappropriate transfusions.

Alan Tinmouth1, Troy Thompson, Donald M Arnold, Jeannie L Callum, Kate Gagliardi, Deborah Lauzon, Wendy Owens, Peter Pinkerton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frozen plasma (FP) is frequently transfused inappropriately, an intervention that results in risk without benefit for the patient. To better understand current utilization practices in our region, we undertook a provincewide prospective audit to evaluate the clinical indications and appropriateness of FP transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All hospitals in the Canadian province of Ontario with transfusion medicine services were invited to participate in a 5-day audit of FP utilization. FP dose, indication, and clinical patient data were collected for each transfusion request. Indications for FP transfusions were independently adjudicated as appropriate, inappropriate, or indeterminate based on predefined criteria.
RESULTS: Seventy-six (49%) of 155 invited hospitals participated in the audit, which included 573 requests for 2012 units of FP. A total of 559 transfusions (1909 units) were administered. Of 573 requests, 164 (28.6%) were deemed inappropriate most often because: 1) they were administered to patients with an international normalized ratio below 1.5 or 2) they were administered in absence of bleeding or emergency surgery. The most frequent indications for FP transfusions were before surgery and warfarin reversal. Overall, patients admitted to the clinical areas of surgery, internal medicine, and the emergency department represented the largest users of FP, but this varied by hospital type (community vs. academic). The most frequently requested doses of FP were 2 and 4 units.
CONCLUSION: This point-prevalence hospital audit revealed that transfusion of FP is frequently inappropriate. Focusing on reducing the two most common reasons for inappropriate FP transfusions could lead to a significant improvement in FP utilization.
© 2013 American Association of Blood Banks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23672421     DOI: 10.1111/trf.12231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  16 in total

Review 1.  Plasma Transfusion Demystified: A Review of the Key Factors Influencing the Response to Plasma Transfusion.

Authors:  Allen W Bryan; Elizabeth M Staley; Timothy Kennell; Alexander Z Feldman; Lance A Williams; Huy P Pham
Journal:  Lab Med       Date:  2017-05-01

2.  A multicenter study of plasma use in the United States.

Authors:  Darrell Triulzi; Jerome Gottschall; Edward Murphy; Yanyun Wu; Paul Ness; Daryl Kor; Nareg Roubinian; Debra Fleischmann; Dhuly Chowdhury; Donald Brambilla
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Use of fresh-frozen plasma in 2012 at the Fondazione Ca' Granda Hospital of Milan: assessment of appropriateness using record linkage techniques applied to data routinely recorded in various hospital information systems.

Authors:  Monica Lanzoni; Barbara Olivero; Andrea Artoni; Maurizio Marconi; Elisabetta Raspollini; Silvana Castaldi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Prophylactic plasma transfusion for surgical patients with abnormal preoperative coagulation tests: a single-institution propensity-adjusted cohort study.

Authors:  Qing Jia; Michael J Brown; Leanne Clifford; Gregory A Wilson; Mark J Truty; James R Stubbs; Darrell R Schroeder; Andrew C Hanson; Ognjen Gajic; Daryl J Kor
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 18.959

5.  Prophylactic plasma transfusion for patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan Huber; Simon J Stanworth; Carolyn Doree; Marialena Trivella; Susan J Brunskill; Sally Hopewell; Kirstin L Wilkinson; Lise J Estcourt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-17

6.  Prophylactic plasma transfusion for patients without inherited bleeding disorders or anticoagulant use undergoing non-cardiac surgery or invasive procedures.

Authors:  Jonathan Huber; Simon J Stanworth; Carolyn Doree; Patricia M Fortin; Marialena Trivella; Susan J Brunskill; Sally Hopewell; Kirstin L Wilkinson; Lise J Estcourt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-28

7.  Effect of transfusion of fresh frozen plasma on parameters of endothelial condition and inflammatory status in non-bleeding critically ill patients: a prospective substudy of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Marleen Straat; Marcella C A Müller; Joost C M Meijers; Mendi S Arbous; Angelique M E Spoelstra-de Man; Charlotte J P Beurskens; Margreeth B Vroom; Nicole P Juffermans
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 8.  Prophylactic plasma and platelet transfusion in the critically Ill patient: just useless and expensive or even harmful?

Authors:  Klaus Görlinger; Fuat H Saner
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Plasma is ineffective in correcting mildly elevated PT-INR in critically ill children: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Esther Paula Soundar; Ronald Besandre; Sarah Kate Hartman; Jun Teruya; Shiu-Ki Rocky Hui
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2014-11-29

Review 10.  Quality Assessment of Established and Emerging Blood Components for Transfusion.

Authors:  Jason P Acker; Denese C Marks; William P Sheffield
Journal:  J Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.