Literature DB >> 23671732

Does in-house availability of multidisciplinary teams increase survival in upper gastrointestinal-cancer?

Christian Kersten1, Milada Cvancarova, Svein Mjåland, Odd Mjåland.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the effect of the establishment of in-house multidisciplinary team (MDT) availability (iMDTa) on survival in upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGI) patients.
METHODS: In 2001, a cancer centre with irradiation and chemotherapy facilities was established in the Norwegian county of West Agder with a change of iMDTa (WA/MDT-Change). "iMDTa"-status was defined according to the availability of the necessary specialists within one institution on one campus, serving the population of one county. We compared survival rates during 2000-2008 for UGI patients living in counties with (MDT-Yes), without (MDT-No), with a mix (MDT-Mix) and WA/MDT-Change. Survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier method. Cox model was used to uncover differences between counties with different MDT status when adjusted for age, sex and stage.
RESULTS: We analyzed 395 patients from WA/MDT-Change and compared their survival to 12 135 UGI patients from four other Norwegian regions. Median overall survival for UGI patients in WA/MDT-Change increased from 129 to 300 d from 2000-2008, P = 0.001. The regions with the highest level of iMDTa achieved the largest decrease in risk of death for UGI cancers (compared to the county with MDT-Mix: MDT-Yes 11%, P < 0.05 and WA/MDT-Change 15%, P < 0.05). Analyzing the different tumour entities separately, patients living in the WA/MDT-Change county reached a statistically significant reduction in the risk of death [hazard ratios (HR)] compared to patients in the county with MDT-Mix for oesophageal and gastric, but not for pancreatic cancer. HR for the study period 2000-2004 are given first and then for the period 2005-2008: The HR for oesophageal cancers was reduced from [HR = 1.12; 95%CI: 0.75-1.68 to HR = 0.60, 95%CI: 0.38-0.95] and for gastric cancers from [HR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.66-1.15 to HR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.43-0.93], but not for pancreatic cancer [HR = 1.04-, 95%CI: 0.83-1.3 for 2000-2004 and HR = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.78-1.3 for 2005-2008]. UGI patients treated during the second study period in the county of WA/MDT-Change had a higher probability of receiving chemotherapy. In the first study period, only one out of 43 patients (2.4%, 95%CI: 0-6.9) received chemotherapy, compared to 18 of 42 patients diagnosed during 2005-2008 (42.9%, 95%CI: 28.0-57.8).
CONCLUSION: Introduction of iMDTa led to a two-fold increase of UGI patients, whereas no increase in survival was found in the MDT-No or MDT-Mix counties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Gastroesophageal cancer; Multidisciplinary team; Multidisciplinary treatment; Oesophageal cancer; Pancreatic cancer; Survival

Year:  2013        PMID: 23671732      PMCID: PMC3648664          DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v5.i3.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol


  19 in total

1.  Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Cath Taylor; Alastair J Munro; Rob Glynne-Jones; Clive Griffith; Paul Trevatt; Michael Richards; Amanda J Ramirez
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-23

Review 2.  Examining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: an international literature review.

Authors:  Nicole J Look Hong; Frances C Wright; Anna R Gagliardi; Lawrence F Paszat
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.

Authors:  Inger Kristin Larsen; Milada Småstuen; Tom Børge Johannesen; Frøydis Langmark; Donald Maxwell Parkin; Freddie Bray; Bjørn Møller
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Introducing national guidelines on perioperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer in Norway: a retrospective audit.

Authors:  T Hølmebakk; G Frykholm; A Viste
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 5.  Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin W Lamb; Katrina F Brown; Kamal Nagpal; Charles Vincent; James S A Green; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Quality improvement in multidisciplinary cancer teams: an investigation of teamwork and clinical decision-making and cross-validation of assessments.

Authors:  B W Lamb; N Sevdalis; H Mostafid; C Vincent; J S A Green
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Upper gastrointestinal tumors: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Yixing Jiang; Eric T Kimchi; Alberto J Montero; Kevin F Staveley-O'Carroll; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.512

8.  Evaluating the impact of a single-day multidisciplinary clinic on the management of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Timothy M Pawlik; Daniel Laheru; Ralph H Hruban; Joann Coleman; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kurt Campbell; Syed Ali; Elliot K Fishman; Richard D Schulick; Joseph M Herman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Travel time to hospital and treatment for breast, colon, rectum, lung, ovary and prostate cancer.

Authors:  A P Jones; R Haynes; V Sauerzapf; S M Crawford; H Zhao; D Forman
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care.

Authors:  Karyn B Stitzenberg; Elin R Sigurdson; Brian L Egleston; Russell B Starkey; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  10 in total

1.  Development and testing of the cancer multidisciplinary team meeting observational tool (MDT-MOT).

Authors:  Jenny Harris; Cath Taylor; Nick Sevdalis; Rozh Jalil; James S A Green
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  ReCAP: Impact of Multidisciplinary Care on Processes of Cancer Care: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Eberechukwu Onukwugha; Nicholas J Petrelli; Kathleen M Castro; James F Gardner; Jinani Jayasekera; Olga Goloubeva; Ming T Tan; Erica J McNamara; Howard A Zaren; Thomas Asfeldt; James D Bearden; Andrew L Salner; Mark J Krasna; Irene Prabhu Das; Steve B Clauser; Eberechukwu Onukwugha; Nicholas J Petrelli; Kathleen M Castro; James F Gardner; Jinani Jayasekera; Olga Goloubeva; Ming T Tan; Erica J McNamara; Howard A Zaren; Thomas Asfeldt; James D Bearden; Andrew L Salner; Mark J Krasna; Irene Prabhu Das; Steve B Clauser
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Defining the optimal design of the inflammatory bowel disease multidisciplinary team: results from a multicentre qualitative expert-based study.

Authors:  Pritesh Morar; Jamie Read; Sonal Arora; Ailsa Hart; Janindra Warusavitarne; James Green; Nick Sevdalis; Cathryn Edwards; Omar Faiz
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-26

4.  Using peer observers to assess the quality of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative proof of concept study.

Authors:  Jenny Harris; James Sa Green; Nick Sevdalis; Cath Taylor
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2014-08-11

5.  What are the appropriate thresholds for High Quality Performance Indicators for breast surgery in Australia and New Zealand?

Authors:  Shehnarz Salindera; Michelle Ogilvy; Andrew Spillane
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Primary liver cancer in the UK: Incidence, incidence-based mortality, and survival by subtype, sex, and nation.

Authors:  Anya Burton; Daniela Tataru; Robert J Driver; Thomas G Bird; Dyfed Huws; David Wallace; Timothy J S Cross; Ian A Rowe; Graeme Alexander; Aileen Marshall
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2021-01-19

7.  Establishing the aims, format and function for multidisciplinary team-driven care within an inflammatory bowel disease service: a multicentre qualitative specialist-based consensus study.

Authors:  Pritesh S Morar; Nick Sevdalis; Janindra Warusavitarne; Ailsa Hart; James Green; Cathryn Edwards; Omar Faiz
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-10

8.  Mobilising stakeholders to improve access to state-of-the-art radiotherapy in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Ndimofor Chofor; Pierre Bopda; Rebecca Bücker; Azeh Ivo; Ernest Okonkwo; Kra Joel; Zanzem Tung; Taofeeq Ige; Holger Wirtz; Wilfred Ngwa
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-05-10

Review 9.  Benefits of multidisciplinary teamwork in the management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Cath Taylor; Amanda Shewbridge; Jenny Harris; James S Green
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2013-08-30

10.  Clinical audit of multidisciplinary care at a medium-sized hospital in Spain.

Authors:  Ana Ruiz-Casado; María Jesús Ortega; Ana Soria; Héctor Cebolla
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.754

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.