Literature DB >> 23670947

Predicting county-level cancer incidence rates and counts in the USA.

Binbing Yu1.   

Abstract

Many countries, including the USA, publish predicted numbers of cancer incidence and death in current and future years for the whole country. These predictions provide important information on the cancer burden for cancer control planners, policymakers and the general public. Based on evidence from several empirical studies, the joinpoint (segmented-line linear regression) model (JPM) has been adopted by the American Cancer Society to estimate the number of new cancer cases in the USA and in individual states since 2007. Recently, cancer incidence in smaller geographic regions such as counties, and local policy makers are increasingly interested with Federal Information Processing Standard code regions. The natural extension is to directly apply the JPM to county-level cancer incidence data. The direct application has several drawbacks and its performance has not been evaluated. To address the concerns, we developed a spatial random-effects JPM for county-level cancer incidence data. The proposed model was used to predict both cancer incidence rates and counts at the county level. The standard JPM and the proposed method were compared through a validation study. The proposed method outperformed the standard JPM for almost all cancer sites, especially for moderate or rare cancer sites and for counties with small population sizes. As an application, we predicted county-level prostate cancer incidence rates and counts for the year 2011 in Connecticut. Published 2013. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SEER; ZIP model; cancer incidence; joinpoint model; spatial correlation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23670947      PMCID: PMC5933533          DOI: 10.1002/sim.5833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  16 in total

1.  Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates.

Authors:  H J Kim; M P Fay; E J Feuer; D N Midthune
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Identifiability and convergence issues for Markov chain Monte Carlo fitting of spatial models.

Authors:  L E Eberly; B P Carlin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000 Sep 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Determination of county-level prostate carcinoma incidence and detection rates with Medicare claims data.

Authors:  G S Cooper; Z Yuan; R N Jethva; A A Rimm
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  A new method of estimating United States and state-level cancer incidence counts for the current calendar year.

Authors:  Linda W Pickle; Yongping Hao; Ahmedin Jemal; Zhaohui Zou; Ram C Tiwari; Elizabeth Ward; Mark Hachey; Holly L Howe; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions.

Authors:  David Lunn; David Spiegelhalter; Andrew Thomas; Nicky Best
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Modelling population-based cancer survival trends using join point models for grouped survival data.

Authors:  Binbing Yu; Lan Huang; Ram C Tiwari; Eric J Feuer; Karen A Johnson
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.483

7.  Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2008, featuring cancers associated with excess weight and lack of sufficient physical activity.

Authors:  Christie Eheman; S Jane Henley; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Eric J Jacobs; Maria J Schymura; Anne-Michelle Noone; Liping Pan; Robert N Anderson; Janet E Fulton; Betsy A Kohler; Ahmedin Jemal; Elizabeth Ward; Marcus Plescia; Lynn A G Ries; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer--part II: Cause of death misclassification and the recent rise and fall in prostate cancer mortality.

Authors:  E J Feuer; R M Merrill; B F Hankey
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-06-16       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  SELECTING THE NUMBER OF CHANGE-POINTS IN SEGMENTED LINE REGRESSION.

Authors:  Hyune-Ju Kim; Binbing Yu; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 1.261

10.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  3 in total

1.  Assessing spatial confounding in cancer disease mapping using R.

Authors:  Douglas R M Azevedo; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay; Marcos O Prates; Abdel-Salam G Abdel-Salam; Dina Garcia
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-07-28

2.  Age at diagnosis on prostate cancer survival undergoing androgen deprivation therapy as primary treatment in daily practice: results from Japanese observational cohort.

Authors:  Teruo Inamoto; Haruhito Azuma; Shiro Hinotsu; Taiji Tsukamoto; Mototsugu Oya; Osamu Ogawa; Tadaichi Kitamura; Suzuki Kazuhiro; Seiji Naito; Mikio Namiki; Kazuo Nishimura; Yoshihiko Hirao; Michiyuki Usami; Masaru Murai; Hideyuki Akaza
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Incidence and prognosis of thyroid cancer in children: based on the SEER database.

Authors:  Bing Zhang; Wenming Wu; Xiaofei Shang; Deliang Huang; Mingbo Liu; Liang Zong
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 1.827

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.