Literature DB >> 23670809

Cost savings associated with prevention of recurrent lumbar disc herniation with a novel annular closure device: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Scott L Parker1, Gordan Grahovac, Duje Vukas, Darko Ledic, Milorad Vilendecic, Matthew J McGirt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Same-level recurrent disc herniation is a well-defined complication following lumbar discectomy. Reherniation results in increased morbidity and health care costs. Techniques to reduce these consequences may improve outcomes and reduce cost after lumbar discectomy. In a prospective cohort study, we set out to evaluate the cost associated with surgical management of recurrent, same-level lumbar disc herniation following primary discectomy.
METHODS: Forty-six consecutive European patients undergoing lumbar discectomy for a single-level herniated disc at two institutions were prospectively followed with clinical and radiographic evaluations. A second consecutive cohort of 30 patients undergoing 31 lumbar discectomies with implantation of an annular closure device was followed at the same hospitals and same follow-up intervals. Cost estimates for reherniation were modeled on Medicare national allowable payment amounts (direct cost) and patient work-day losses (indirect cost).
RESULTS: Annular closure and control cohorts were matched at baseline. By 2 years follow-up, symptomatic recurrent same-level disc herniation occurred in three (6.5%) patients in the control cohort versus zero (0%) patients in the annular closure cohort. For patients experiencing recurrent disc herniation, mean estimated direct and indirect cost of management of recurrent disc herniation was $34,242 and $3,778, respectively. Use of an annular closure device potentially results in a cost savings of $222,573 per 100 primary discectomy procedures performed (or $2,226 per discectomy), based solely on the reduction of reoperated reherniations when modeled on U.S. Medicare costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent disc herniation did not occur in any patients after annular closure within the 12-month follow-up. The reduction in the incidence of reherniation was associated with potentially significant cost savings. Development of novel techniques to prevent recurrent lumbar disc herniation is warranted to decrease the associated morbidity and health care costs associated with this complication. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23670809     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1341416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg        ISSN: 2193-6315            Impact factor:   1.268


  12 in total

1.  Lumbar disc herniation: long-term outcomes after mini-open discectomy.

Authors:  Ahmed Benzakour; Thami Benzakour
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The Functional Role of Interface Tissue Engineering in Annulus Fibrosus Repair: Bridging Mechanisms of Hydrogel Integration with Regenerative Outcomes.

Authors:  Tyler J DiStefano; Jennifer O Shmukler; George Danias; James C Iatridis
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2020-11-18

Review 3.  Incidence of Low Back Pain After Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Disc and Its Effect on Patient-reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Stephen K Mendenhall; Saniya S Godil; Priya Sivasubramanian; Kevin Cahill; John Ziewacz; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Artificial intelligence predicts disk re-herniation following lumbar microdiscectomy: development of the "RAD" risk profile.

Authors:  Garrett K Harada; Zakariah K Siyaji; G Michael Mallow; Alexander L Hornung; Fayyazul Hassan; Bryce A Basques; Haseeb A Mohammed; Arash J Sayari; Dino Samartzis; Howard S An
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Predictors of Treatment Success Following Limited Discectomy With Annular Closure for Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Aleksandr V Krutko; Abdugafur J Sanginov; Evgenii S Baykov
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-02-29

6.  Performance of an Annular Closure Device in a 'Real-World', Heterogeneous, At-Risk, Lumbar Discectomy Population.

Authors:  Adisa Kuršumović; Stefan Rath
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-11-06

Review 7.  Annular closure device for disc herniation: meta-analysis of clinical outcome and complications.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; Kevin Phan; Ashish D Diwan; Chon Sum Ong; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Post-lumbar discectomy reoperations that are associated with poor clinical and socioeconomic outcomes can be reduced through use of a novel annular closure device: results from a 2-year randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Peter Douglas Klassen; Wellington K Hsu; Frederic Martens; Jason A Inzana; Wimar A van den Brink; Michael W Groff; Claudius Thomé
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-06-26

9.  Multicenter study of lumbar discectomy with Barricaid annular closure device for prevention of lumbar disc reherniation in US patients: A historically controlled post-market study protocol.

Authors:  K Brandon Strenge; Christian P DiPaola; Larry E Miller; Clint P Hill; Robert G Whitmore
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Patients at the Highest Risk for Reherniation Following Lumbar Discectomy in a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Frederic Martens; Peter Vajkoczy; Senol Jadik; Aldemar Hegewald; Jonathan Stieber; Robert Hes
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2018-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.