Literature DB >> 23669542

Separating intrinsic and environmental contributions to growth and their population consequences.

Andrew O Shelton1, William H Satterthwaite, Michael P Beakes, Stephan B Munch, Susan M Sogard, Marc Mangel.   

Abstract

Among-individual heterogeneity in growth is a commonly observed phenomenon that has clear consequences for population and community dynamics yet has proved difficult to quantify in practice. In particular, observed among-individual variation in growth can be difficult to link to any given mechanism. Here, we develop a Bayesian state-space framework for modeling growth that bridges the complexity of bioenergetic models and the statistical simplicity of phenomenological growth models. The model allows for intrinsic individual variation in traits, a shared environment, process stochasticity, and measurement error. We apply the model to two populations of steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) grown under common but temporally varying food conditions. Models allowing for individual variation match available data better than models that assume a single shared trait for all individuals. Estimated individual variation translated into a roughly twofold range in realized growth rates within populations. Comparisons between populations showed strong differences in trait means, trait variability, and responses to a shared environment. Together, individual- and population-level variation have substantial implications for variation in size and growth rates among and within populations. State-dependent life-history models predict that this variation can lead to differences in individual life-history expression, lifetime reproductive output, and population life-history diversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23669542     DOI: 10.1086/670198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  6 in total

1.  Effects of genetics and early-life mild hypoxia on size variation in farmed gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata).

Authors:  Erick Perera; Enrique Rosell-Moll; Fernando Naya-Català; Paula Simó-Mirabet; Josep Calduch-Giner; Jaume Pérez-Sánchez
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.794

2.  A method for detecting positive growth autocorrelation without marking individuals.

Authors:  Mollie E Brooks; Michael W McCoy; Benjamin M Bolker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Is bigger really better? Relative and absolute body size influence individual growth rate under competition.

Authors:  Josh Van Buskirk; Eva Cereghetti; Julia S Hess
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Biological and statistical interpretation of size-at-age, mixed-effects models of growth.

Authors:  Simone Vincenzi; Dusan Jesensek; Alain J Crivelli
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Resurgence of an apex marine predator and the decline in prey body size.

Authors:  Jan Ohlberger; Daniel E Schindler; Eric J Ward; Timothy E Walsworth; Timothy E Essington
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Determining individual variation in growth and its implication for life-history and population processes using the empirical Bayes method.

Authors:  Simone Vincenzi; Marc Mangel; Alain J Crivelli; Stephan Munch; Hans J Skaug
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.