Literature DB >> 23669387

Caspofungin MICs correlate with treatment outcomes among patients with Candida glabrata invasive candidiasis and prior echinocandin exposure.

Ryan K Shields1, M Hong Nguyen, Ellen G Press, Cassaundra L Updike, Cornelius J Clancy.   

Abstract

Mutations in Candida glabrata FKS genes, which encode the echinocandin target enzyme, are independent risk factors for treatment failures during invasive candidiasis. We retrospectively compared the ability of caspofungin susceptibility testing methods to identify C. glabrata FKS mutant isolates and predict outcomes among patients at our center. Eight percent (10/120) of sterile-site C. glabrata isolates harbored FKS1 (n = 3) or FKS2 (n = 7) mutations, including 32% (10/32) recovered from patients with prior echinocandin exposure. Median echinocandin exposures for mutant and nonmutant isolates were 55 (range, 7 to 188) and 13 (3 to 84) days, respectively (P = 0.004). Sensitivity and specificity of the CLSI caspofungin resistance breakpoint MIC (>0.12 μg/ml by broth microdilution using RPMI medium [BMD-RPMI]) were 90% (9/10) and 3% (3/110), respectively, for identifying FKS mutants. Sensitivity and specificity of receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve-derived breakpoints by BMD-RPMI, BMD-antibiotic medium 3, Etest, and YeastOne ranged from 70 to 100% and 89 to 95%, respectively; susceptibility rates varied from 83 to 90%. The 14-day echinocandin treatment success rate was 67% (44/66); failure was more likely with prior echinocandin exposure (P = 0.002) or infection with an FKS mutant (P = 0.0001) or echinocandin-resistant isolates by BMD-AM3, Etest, and YeastOne (P ≤ 0.03). The failure rate among patients with prior exposure and infection with a resistant isolate was 91% (10/11); it was 22% (12/55) among others (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, ROC-derived caspofungin MIC breakpoints by several methods were sensitive and specific for identifying C. glabrata FKS mutant isolates. Mutations were seen exclusively among patients with prior echinocandin exposure. A paradigm that considers prior echinocandin exposure and caspofungin MICs accurately classified treatment outcomes for C. glabrata invasive candidiasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23669387      PMCID: PMC3719767          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00136-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  32 in total

1.  Interlaboratory comparison of results of susceptibility testing with caspofungin against Candida and Aspergillus species.

Authors:  Frank C Odds; Mary Motyl; Roberto Andrade; Jacques Bille; Emilia Cantón; Manuel Cuenca-Estrella; Amanda Davidson; Christian Durussel; David Ellis; Elyse Foraker; Annette W Fothergill; Mahmoud A Ghannoum; Robert A Giacobbe; Miguel Gobernado; Rosemary Handke; Michel Laverdière; Wendy Lee-Yang; William G Merz; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Javier Pemán; Sophia Perea; John R Perfect; Michael A Pfaller; Laurie Proia; John H Rex; Michael G Rinaldi; Juan-Luis Rodriguez-Tudela; Wiley A Schell; Christine Shields; Deanna A Sutton; Paul E Verweij; David W Warnock
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Sensititre YeastOne caspofungin susceptibility testing of Candida clinical isolates: correlation with results of NCCLS M27-A2 multicenter study.

Authors:  Emilia Cantón; Javier Pemán; Miguel Gobernado; Elena Alvarez; Fernando Baquero; Ramón Cisterna; Joaquina Gil; Estrella Martín-Mazuelos; Carmen Rubio; Aurora Sánchez-Sousa; Carmen Serrano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparative evaluation of Etest and sensititre yeastone panels against the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27-A2 reference broth microdilution method for testing Candida susceptibility to seven antifungal agents.

Authors:  Barbara D Alexander; Terry C Byrne; Kelly L Smith; Kimberly E Hanson; Kevin J Anstrom; John R Perfect; L Barth Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  EUCAST definitive document EDef 7.1: method for the determination of broth dilution MICs of antifungal agents for fermentative yeasts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  McNemar chi2 test revisited: comparing sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic examinations.

Authors:  A Trajman; R R Luiz
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.713

6.  Evaluation of Etest method for determining caspofungin (MK-0991) susceptibilities of 726 clinical isolates of Candida species.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; S A Messer; K Mills; A Bolmström; R N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Caspofungin susceptibility testing of isolates from patients with esophageal candidiasis or invasive candidiasis: relationship of MIC to treatment outcome.

Authors:  Nicholas Kartsonis; John Killar; Lori Mixson; Chao-Min Hoe; Carole Sable; Kenneth Bartizal; Mary Motyl
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In vitro susceptibility of Candida species to five antifungal agents in a German university hospital assessed by the reference broth microdilution method and Etest.

Authors:  Ralf Fleck; Annebärbel Dietz; Herbert Hof
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Increasing echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata: clinical failure correlates with presence of FKS mutations and elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations.

Authors:  Barbara D Alexander; Melissa D Johnson; Christopher D Pfeiffer; Cristina Jiménez-Ortigosa; Jelena Catania; Rachel Booker; Mariana Castanheira; Shawn A Messer; David S Perlin; Michael A Pfaller
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Antifungal susceptibility survey of 2,000 bloodstream Candida isolates in the United States.

Authors:  Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; John H Rex; Peter G Pappas; Richard J Hamill; Robert A Larsen; Harold W Horowitz; William G Powderly; Newton Hyslop; Carol A Kauffman; John Cleary; Julie E Mangino; Jeannette Lee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  [Strategies for antifungal treatment failure in intensive care units].

Authors:  C Arens; M Bernhard; C Koch; A Heininger; D Störzinger; T Hoppe-Tichy; M Hecker; B Grabein; M A Weigand; C Lichtenstern
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Rapid emergence of echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata resulting in clinical and microbiologic failure.

Authors:  James S Lewis; Nathan P Wiederhold; Brian L Wickes; Thomas F Patterson; James H Jorgensen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  The Emerging Threat of Antifungal Resistance in Transplant Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Ilan S Schwartz; Thomas F Patterson
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.725

4.  Use of anidulafungin as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to caspofungin among 4,290 clinical isolates of Candida by using CLSI methods and interpretive criteria.

Authors:  Michael A Pfaller; Daniel J Diekema; Ronald N Jones; Mariana Castanheira
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Management of invasive candidiasis in nonneutropenic ICU patients.

Authors:  Emmanuel Weiss; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Ther Adv Infect Dis       Date:  2014-10

6.  Efficacy and tolerability of micafungin monotherapy for candidemia and deep-seated candidiasis in adults with cancer.

Authors:  Dimitrios Farmakiotis; Jeffrey J Tarrand; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Dose escalation studies with caspofungin against Candida glabrata.

Authors:  Marianna Domán; Renátó Kovács; David S Perlin; Gábor Kardos; Rudolf Gesztelyi; Béla Juhász; Aliz Bozó; László Majoros
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 8.  Resistance of Candida spp. to antifungal drugs in the ICU: where are we now?

Authors:  Danièle Maubon; Cécile Garnaud; Thierry Calandra; Dominique Sanglard; Muriel Cornet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Multicenter study of epidemiological cutoff values and detection of resistance in Candida spp. to anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin using the Sensititre YeastOne colorimetric method.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; M Alvarez-Fernandez; E Cantón; P L Carver; S C-A Chen; G Eschenauer; D L Getsinger; G M Gonzalez; N P Govender; A Grancini; K E Hanson; S E Kidd; K Klinker; C J Kubin; J V Kus; S R Lockhart; J Meletiadis; A J Morris; T Pelaez; G Quindós; M Rodriguez-Iglesias; F Sánchez-Reus; S Shoham; N L Wengenack; N Borrell Solé; J Echeverria; J Esperalba; E Gómez-G de la Pedrosa; I García García; M J Linares; F Marco; P Merino; J Pemán; L Pérez Del Molino; E Roselló Mayans; C Rubio Calvo; M Ruiz Pérez de Pipaon; G Yagüe; G Garcia-Effron; J Guinea; D S Perlin; M Sanguinetti; R Shields; J Turnidge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Rapid development of Candida krusei echinocandin resistance during caspofungin therapy.

Authors:  A Forastiero; V Garcia-Gil; O Rivero-Menendez; R Garcia-Rubio; M C Monteiro; A Alastruey-Izquierdo; R Jordan; I Agorio; E Mellado
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.