Literature DB >> 23668882

Defining a key receptor-CheA kinase contact and elucidating its function in the membrane-bound bacterial chemosensory array: a disulfide mapping and TAM-IDS Study.

Kene N Piasta1, Caleb J Ulliman, Peter F Slivka, Brian R Crane, Joseph J Falke.   

Abstract

The three core components of the ubiquitous bacterial chemosensory array - the transmembrane chemoreceptor, the histidine kinase CheA, and the adaptor protein CheW - assemble to form a membrane-bound, hexagonal lattice in which receptor transmembrane signals regulate kinase activity. Both the regulatory domain of the kinase and the adaptor protein bind to overlapping sites on the cytoplasmic tip of the receptor (termed the protein interaction region). Notably, the kinase regulatory domain and the adaptor protein share the same fold constructed of two SH3-like domains. The present study focuses on the structural interface between the receptor and the kinase regulatory domain. Two models have been proposed for this interface: Model 1 is based on the crystal structure of a homologous Thermotoga complex between a receptor fragment and the CheW adaptor protein. This model has been used in current models of chemosensory array architecture to build the receptor-CheA kinase interface. Model 2 is based on a newly determined crystal structure of a homologous Thermotoga complex between a receptor fragment and the CheA kinase regulatory domain. Both models present unique strengths and weaknesses, and current evidence is unable to resolve which model best describes contacts in the native chemosensory arrays of Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and other bacteria. Here we employ disulfide mapping and tryptophan and alanine mutation to identify docking sites (TAM-IDS) to test Models 1 and 2 in well-characterized membrane-bound arrays formed from E. coli and S. typhimurium components. The results reveal that the native array interface between the receptor protein interaction region and the kinase regulatory domain is accurately described by Model 2, but not by Model 1. In addition, the results show that the interface possesses both a structural function that contributes to stable CheA kinase binding in the array and a regulatory function central to transmission of the activation signal from receptor to CheA kinase. On-off switching alters the disulfide formation rates of specific Cys pairs at the interface, but not most Cys pairs, indicating that signaling perturbs localized regions of the interface. The findings suggest a simple model for the rearrangement of the interface triggered by the attractant signal and for longer range transmission of the signal in the chemosensory array.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23668882      PMCID: PMC3705729          DOI: 10.1021/bi400385c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  64 in total

1.  Four-helical-bundle structure of the cytoplasmic domain of a serine chemotaxis receptor.

Authors:  K K Kim; H Yokota; S H Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Crystal structure of the CheA histidine phosphotransfer domain that mediates response regulator phosphorylation in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  L Mourey; S Da Re; J D Pédelacq; T Tolstykh; C Faurie; V Guillet; J B Stock; J P Samama
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-05-31       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Side chains at the membrane-water interface modulate the signaling state of a transmembrane receptor.

Authors:  Aaron S Miller; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Reconstruction of the chemotaxis receptor-kinase assembly.

Authors:  Sang-Youn Park; Peter P Borbat; Gabriela Gonzalez-Bonet; Jaya Bhatnagar; Abiola M Pollard; Jack H Freed; Alexandrine M Bilwes; Brian R Crane
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2006-04-23       Impact factor: 15.369

5.  High-resolution structures of the ligand binding domain of the wild-type bacterial aspartate receptor.

Authors:  J I Yeh; H P Biemann; G G Privé; J Pandit; D E Koshland; S H Kim
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-09-20       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Structure of the CheY-binding domain of histidine kinase CheA in complex with CheY.

Authors:  M Welch; N Chinardet; L Mourey; C Birck; J P Samama
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1998-01

Review 7.  "Frozen" dynamic dimer model for transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemotaxis receptors.

Authors:  S H Kim
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  CheA-receptor interaction sites in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Xiqing Wang; Anh Vu; Kwangwoon Lee; Frederick W Dahlquist
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Transmembrane signaling by the aspartate receptor: engineered disulfides reveal static regions of the subunit interface.

Authors:  S A Chervitz; C M Lin; J J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Variable sizes of Escherichia coli chemoreceptor signaling teams.

Authors:  Robert G Endres; Olga Oleksiuk; Clinton H Hansen; Yigal Meir; Victor Sourjik; Ned S Wingreen
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Signaling and sensory adaptation in Escherichia coli chemoreceptors: 2015 update.

Authors:  John S Parkinson; Gerald L Hazelbauer; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 2.  A tale of two machines: a review of the BLAST meeting, Tucson, AZ, 20-24 January 2013.

Authors:  Christine Josenhans; Kirsten Jung; Christopher V Rao; Alan J Wolfe
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Signalling-dependent interactions between the kinase-coupling protein CheW and chemoreceptors in living cells.

Authors:  Andrea Pedetta; John S Parkinson; Claudia A Studdert
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Bacterial chemoreceptor dynamics correlate with activity state and are coupled over long distances.

Authors:  Dipanjan Samanta; Peter P Borbat; Boris Dzikovski; Jack H Freed; Brian R Crane
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Baseplate variability of Vibrio cholerae chemoreceptor arrays.

Authors:  Wen Yang; Alejandra Alvarado; Timo Glatter; Simon Ringgaard; Ariane Briegel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins: a core sensing element in prokaryotes and archaea.

Authors:  Abu Iftiaf Md Salah Ud-Din; Anna Roujeinikova
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Assigning chemoreceptors to chemosensory pathways in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Davi R Ortega; Aaron D Fleetwood; Tino Krell; Caroline S Harwood; Grant J Jensen; Igor B Zhulin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The source of high signal cooperativity in bacterial chemosensory arrays.

Authors:  Germán E Piñas; Vered Frank; Ady Vaknin; John S Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Regulatory Role of an Interdomain Linker in the Bacterial Chemotaxis Histidine Kinase CheA.

Authors:  Xueye Ding; Qiang He; Fenglin Shen; Frederick W Dahlquist; Xiqing Wang
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Structure, function, and on-off switching of a core unit contact between CheA kinase and CheW adaptor protein in the bacterial chemosensory array: A disulfide mapping and mutagenesis study.

Authors:  Andrew M Natale; Jane L Duplantis; Kene N Piasta; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.