Literature DB >> 23667756

Mucosal mast cell count is associated with intestinal permeability in patients with diarrhea predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

Hyuk Lee1, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Hong Joo Kim, Yong Kyun Cho, Chong Il Sohn, Woo Kyu Jeon, Byung Ik Kim, Seoung Wan Chae.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although mucosal mast cell tryptase is known to significantly increase intestinal permeability, the relationship between mucosal mast cells and intestinal permeability remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation among intestinal permeability, tryptase activity and mucosal mast cell count.
METHODS: Rectal biopsies from 16 patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) and 7 normal subjects were assessed for tryptase activity and macromolecular permeability using horseradish peroxidase in Ussing chambers. In addition, mucosal mast cell levels were immunohistochemically quantified via image analysis.
RESULTS: Rectal biopsy of tissues from IBS-D patients showed significantly increased permeability compared with those from normal controls (0.644 ± 0.08 and 0.06 ± 0.00 ng/2 hr/mm(2), P < 0.01). Tryptase activity was also substantially higher in rectal biopsy samples from IBS-D patients than those from normal controls (0.86 ± 0.18 and 0.28 ± 0.04 mU/mg protein, P < 0.05). Mucosal mast cell counts were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). However, correlation analysis revealed that only mucosal mast cell count was significantly correlated with intestinal permeability in IBS-D patients (r = 0.558, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a positive correlation between the number of mucosal mast cells and intestinal permeability, suggesting that mucosal mast cells play an important role for increased intestinal permeability in patients with IBS-D.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Irritable bowel syndrome; Mast cell, Permeability; Tryptase

Year:  2013        PMID: 23667756      PMCID: PMC3644661          DOI: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.2.244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 2093-0879            Impact factor:   4.924


Introduction

Abnormal intestinal permeability has been implicated in the pathogenesis of many intestinal diseases, including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Symptoms of post-infectious IBS are associated with a subtle increase in intestinal permeability.1 Patients with diarrhea predominant IBS (IBS-D) have been shown to have increased small intestinal permeability compared to post-infectious IBS patients and controls.2 These findings suggest that an abnormal intestinal barrier facilitates enhanced antigen exposure that may activate the intestinal immune system and induce IBS symptoms such as abdominal pain. Although the mechanism for increased intestinal permeability in IBS is still unclear, mast cells seem to play an important role. Recent studies have demonstrated that chronic stress increased the number and activity of mucosal mast cells and induced mass cell-mediated alterations in epithelial function.3-5 Furthermore, increased numbers of CD3, CD25 lymphocytes and mast cells have been detected in the colonic mucosa of IBS patients.6-8 Finally, it has been shown that IBS-D patients have increased rectal permeability responsive to mast cell tryptase.9 In our previous study,9 we demonstrated that mucosal mast cell tryptase plays an important role in the increased rectal permeability in IBS. However, the relationship between mucosal mast cells and intestinal permeability remains unclear. Therefore, the goal of the present study is to evaluate the correlation among intestinal permeability, tryptase activity and mucosal mast cell count.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

Biopsy specimens of the rectum were obtained during routine colonoscopies of 16 patients with IBS-D and 7 healthy controls at the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital. All the IBS-D patients exhibited symptoms that fulfilled the Rome-II criteria. Participants in the control group had macroscopically and histologically normal colonic mucosa, no persistent bowel symptoms, no organic or functional bowel disease, and no history of chronic medical disease. None of the IBS-D patients had known histories of abdominal surgery, inflammatory bowel disease, or post-infectious IBS. Informed written consent was provided by all patients, and this study was approved by the hospital's local ethics committee. Biopsy forceps with an opening diameter of 6 mm (FB-25K-1; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) were used for the procedures. In most cases, 2 biopsies were taken from the rectum of IBS-D patients and controls.

Staining and Quantification of Mucosal Mast Cells

Staining for mucosal mast cells

Rectal mucosal mast cells were stained using a monoclonal antibody against the human mast cell protease tryptase. Biopsy specimens were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 hours. For the immunohistochemistry, paraffin-embedded specimens were cut with a microtome at 4 µm thickness. Just before staining, slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in graded alcohol solutions. After dewaxing, tissue sections were incubated with 0.5% hydrogen peroxide in methanol at 22℃ for 10 minutes and then washed with running tap water for 15 minutes. Sections were treated with 0.1% trypsin (Sigma, Poole, UK) mixed in 0.1% calcium chloride (pH 7.8) for 10 minutes at 37℃. Nonspecific binding of protein was blocked by incubation in normal rabbit serum diluted 1:5 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS; pH 7.6) for 15 minutes. The slides were then incubated for 18 hours at 4℃ with the monoclonal antibody AA1 (anti-human mast cell protease tryptase; DAKO M7052, Dako Ltd., Cambridge, UK), washed in TBS for 7 minutes, and reincubated for 30 minutes with biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse IgG (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK). After the slides were washed again in TBS for 7 minutes, finally they were incubated with streptavidin-biotin complex conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP; DAKO k0377; Dako) for 30 minutes. The slides were developed in diaminobenzidine-hydrogen peroxide substrate (Sigma) for 10 minutes, and washed under running tap water for 5 minutes. Sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin followed by dehydration and clearance. And then they were mounted in DPX mountant (BDH Prolabo; VWR International Ltd., Leicestershire, UK).

Quantification of mucosal mast cells

Mucosal mast cells were counted under light microscopy at ×400 magnification by an expert pathologist. Immunohistochemically positive-stained mast cells were counted in five consecutive non-overlapping microscopic fields (3 sections × 2 biopsy samples) with areas of 0.24 mm2. The pathologist did not know histological section's group of origin.

Measurement of Intestinal Permeability

The biopsy tissues were mounted in modified Ussing chambers. After mounting, each half chamber was filled with 2 mL Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate (KRB) solution, bathing both the mucosal and serosal sides of the specimen. Both sides were gassed with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 and the temperature was kept at 37℃ by heat block. After a 30-minute equilibration period, the KRB in the chamber of mucosal side was replaced with KRB containing HRP at a final concentration of 0.4 mg/mL, and the KRB on the serosal side was substituted for fresh KRB. A 0.3 mL sample was collected and replaced with 0.3 mL KRB on the serosal side every 30 minutes, for a total of 120 minutes. Samples from the serosal chamber were analyzed enzymatically using a modified Worthington method with o-dianisidine dihydrochloride (OPD; Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA) as the substrate. Samples of 50 µL were relocated to microtitre plates. Then, 100 µL of OPD Working Solution (Stable Peroxide Buffer diluted 1:10 in OPD solution) was transferred to each well, and the plate was incubated in a shaker at 300 rpm at room temperature. After 30 minutes, 100 µL of 2.5 M sulfuric acid was applied, and 10 minutes later, the absorbance of the discolorized reaction product was estimated at a wavelength of 490 nm using a microplate reader (Model 680; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, USA). All samples were run in duplicate and measured in reference to a standard curve. HRP flux was demonstrated as ng/2 hr/mm2 during steady-state permeation in 30 minutes interval.

Tryptase Activity

Ten microliter of the supernatant from a tissue extract were applied to 200 µL of buffer (50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.6; 120 mmol/L NaCl; 20 g/L heparin) containing 0.5 mmol/L mast cell tryptase substrate (tosyl-glycine-proline-arginine-p-nitroanilide) and then they were incubated at room temperature for 17 hours. Substrate cleavage was measured using a microplate reader at an absorbance of 415 nm and normalized to the protein concentration of the supernatant. Concentrations were measured automatically against a standard curve. A specific mast cell tryptase inhibitor (nafamostat mesilate) was used to confirm assay specificity.

Statistical Methods

All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Two-tailed Student's t test was used for comparison of statistical differences in permeability, mucosal mast cell count and tryptase activity between normal subjects and IBS-D patients. Correlations were analyzed by Pearson's correlation. The alpha level of significance was set at P < 0.05. All analyses were performed using SPSS (version 11.5.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Patient Characteristics

Sixteen patients with IBS-D (10 females, aged 24-66 years, mean 54.6 years) and 7 health controls (3 females, aged 38-64 years, mean 49.0 years) were included. There was no significant difference in age and sex between 2 groups (P > 0.05, respectively). The median symptom duration was 65 months (range 7-360 months).

Comparison of Intestinal Permeability, Tryptase Activity and Mucosal Mast Cell Count Between Diarrhea Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients and Controls

Rectal biopsy samples from IBS-D patients showed significantly increased permeability compared with those from normal controls (0.64 ± 0.08 and 0.06 ± 0.00 ng/2 hr/mm2, P < 0.01) (Fig. 1). Tryptase activity was also remarkably higher in rectal biopsy samples from IBS-D patients than those from normal controls (0.86 ± 0.18 and 0.28 ± 0.04 mU/mg protein, P < 0.05). However, mucosal mast cell counts were not significantly different between the 2 groups (4.71 ± 0.60 and 4.66 ± 0.59 number/0.24 mm2, P > 0.05).
Figure 1

Comparison of intestinal permeability, tryptase activity and mucosal mast cell count between IBS-D patients (n = 16) and controls (n = 7). Intestinal permeability (A) and tryptase activity (B) of rectal biopsy tissues from IBS-D patients were significantly increased compared with biopsy tissues from normal controls. (C) However, mucosal mast cell counts were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

Correlation Among Mucosal Mast Cell Count, Tryptase Activity and Intestinal Permeability in Normal Controls

There was no remarkable relationship among intestinal permeability, tryptase activity and mucosal mast cell count in the control group (P > 0.05) (Fig. 2).
Figure 2

Correlation among mucosal mast cell count, tryptase activity and intestinal permeability in normal controls. There was no significant relationship between mucosal mast cell count and permeability (A), tryptase activity and mucosal mast cell count (B), and tryptase activity and permeability (C) (P > 0.05, n = 7, respectively).

Correlation Among Mucosal Mast Cell Count, Tryptase Activity and Intestinal Permeability in Diarrhea Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients

A significant positive correlation between mucosal mast cell count and intestinal permeability was observed (r = 0.558, P < 0.05). However, there were no notable relationships between intestinal permeability and tryptase activity (r = -0.347, P > 0.05) or mucosal mast cell count and tryptase activity (r = -0.448, P > 0.05) (Fig. 3).
Figure 3

Correlation among intestinal permeability, mucosal mast cell count and tryptase activity. (A) A significant correlation was found between intestinal permeability and mucosal mast cell count (r = 0.558, P < 0.05). However, there were no notable relationships between intestinal permeability and tryptase activity (B) or mucosal mast cell count and tryptase activity (C) (P > 0.05, n = 16, respectively).

Discussion

This study demonstrated that mucosal mast cell count is strongly associated with intestinal permeability. Even though there was no significant difference in mucosal mast cell count between IBS-D patients and normal controls, intestinal permeability and tryptase activity were significantly higher in biopsy tissues from IBS-D patients. There is growing evidence that low grade mucosal inflammation plays an important role in the development of IBS,10 with particular attention on mucosal mast cells. Several reports have suggested that IBS patients have a significantly increased number of mucosal mast cells compared with normal controls.6,11 However, other studies have failed to show differences in mucosal mast cell count between IBS patients and controls.12,13 In this study, the mucosal mast cell counts of IBS patients were similar to those of normal controls, while intestinal permeability differed between the 2 groups. These results are not consistent with our previous findings of both higher numbers of mucosal mast cells6 and increased permeability in IBS patients.9 Although small sample size and differences in symptom severity between IBS-D patients could lead to inconsistent results, a possible explanation for this discrepancy in mucosal mast cell count and intestinal permeability between the 2 groups is that activated mast cells may be associated with increased intestinal permeability rather than simply an increase in mucosal mast cell count. Compared to biopsy tissues from normal controls, those from IBS patients showed significantly higher tryptase activity, which is an indicator of mast cell activation in various diseases.14,15 Therefore, despite having similar numbers of mucosal mast cells, the increased number of activated mast cells may induce increased intestinal permeability in IBS patients. One interesting finding from this study was the positive correlation between mucosal mast cell count and intestinal permeability in IBS patients. In our earlier study, mucosal mast cell count was associated with visceral hypersensitivity in IBS-D patients.6 Similarly, other studies have reported that increased intestinal permeability in IBS patients may lead to IBS symptoms and visceral hypersensitivity.16,17 Taken together, these data and our results from the present study support the hypothesis that activated mast cells may be responsible for the enhanced intestinal permeability and sensitivity observed in IBS patients. Tryptase is the most abundant mediator stored in mast cell granules and has been used as a marker for mast cell activation.18 Its activation of protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR-2) on enterocytes causes changes in the organization of tight junction and permits the passage of macromolecules across the epithelial barrier.19,20 Although biopsy tissues from IBS patients in the present study exhibited high levels of tryptase activity and increased permeability, tryptase activity did not correlate with intestinal permeability or mucosal mast cell count. This result likely indicates that enhanced tryptase activity is only partially responsible for the increased permeability, and that other mast cell mediators or neural regulators may participate in the control of intestinal permeability.3,21 Further investigation is needed to identify and verify other mast cell factors that may control intestinal permeability. In conclusion, rectal tissues from IBS-D patients showed increased permeability and tryptase activity compared to those from normal controls. In addition, mucosal mast cell number positively correlated with intestinal permeability. These findings will be important in understanding the pathogenesis of increased intestinal permeability in IBS patients.
  21 in total

1.  Activation of the mucosal immune system in irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Vinton S Chadwick; Wangxue Chen; Dairu Shu; Barbara Paulus; Peter Bethwaite; Andy Tie; Ian Wilson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Phenotypic changes in colonocytes following acute stress or activation of mast cells in mice: implications for delayed epithelial barrier dysfunction.

Authors:  J Demaude; C Salvador-Cartier; J Fioramonti; L Ferrier; L Bueno
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Mast cell infiltration and degranulation in colonic mucosa in the irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  N J Talley; J H Butterfield
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Induction of intestinal inflammation in mouse by activation of proteinase-activated receptor-2.

Authors:  Nicolas Cenac; Anne-Marie Coelho; Cathy Nguyen; Steven Compton; Patricia Andrade-Gordon; Wallace K MacNaughton; John L Wallace; Morley D Hollenberg; Nigel W Bunnett; Rafael Garcia-Villar; Lionel Bueno; Nathalie Vergnolle
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Role of mast cells in chronic stress induced colonic epithelial barrier dysfunction in the rat.

Authors:  J Santos; P C Yang; J D Söderholm; M Benjamin; M H Perdue
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  The level of tryptase in human tears. An indicator of activation of conjunctival mast cells.

Authors:  S I Butrus; K I Ochsner; M B Abelson; L B Schwartz
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Increased rectal mucosal enteroendocrine cells, T lymphocytes, and increased gut permeability following acute Campylobacter enteritis and in post-dysenteric irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  R C Spiller; D Jenkins; J P Thornley; J M Hebden; T Wright; M Skinner; K R Neal
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Intestinal membrane permeability and hypersensitivity in the irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  QiQi Zhou; Buyi Zhang; G Nicholas Verne
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Subjects with diarrhea-predominant IBS have increased rectal permeability responsive to tryptase.

Authors:  Jae Woong Lee; Jung Ho Park; Dong I L Park; Jung-Hwan Park; Hong Joo Kim; Yong Kyun Cho; Chong I L Sohn; Woo Kyu Jeon; Byung Ik Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Tryptase levels as an indicator of mast-cell activation in systemic anaphylaxis and mastocytosis.

Authors:  L B Schwartz; D D Metcalfe; J S Miller; H Earl; T Sullivan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-06-25       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  34 in total

1.  Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide and Mast Cells Regulate Increased Passage of Colonic Bacteria in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Authors:  Olga Bednarska; Susanna A Walter; Maite Casado-Bedmar; Magnus Ström; Eloísa Salvo-Romero; Maria Vicario; Emeran A Mayer; Åsa V Keita
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Crosstalk at the mucosal border: importance of the gut microenvironment in IBS.

Authors:  Lena Öhman; Hans Törnblom; Magnus Simrén
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Use of coated nano zinc oxide as an additive to improve the zinc excretion and intestinal morphology of growing pigs1.

Authors:  Miaomiao M Bai; Hongnan N Liu; Kang Xu; Chaoyue Y Wen; Rong Yu; Jingping P Deng; Yu L Yin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Visceral abdominal obesity is associated with an increased risk of irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Chang Geun Lee; Jun Kyu Lee; Yun-Seong Kang; Seungmin Shin; Jae Hak Kim; Yun Jeong Lim; Moon-Soo Koh; Jin Ho Lee; Hyoun Woo Kang
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Clostridium difficile-related postinfectious IBS: a case of enteroglial microbiological stalking and/or the solution of a conundrum?

Authors:  Gabrio Bassotti; Lara Macchioni; Lanfranco Corazzi; Pierfrancesco Marconi; Katia Fettucciari
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 6.  Immunoglobulin E in irritable bowel syndrome: another target for treatment? A case report and literature review.

Authors:  James S Pearson; Robert M Niven; Jie Meng; Sima Atarodi; Peter J Whorwell
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 7.  Nerve growth factor and diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D): a potential therapeutic target?

Authors:  Xiao-juan Xu; Liang Liu; Shu-kun Yao
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 8.  Acupuncture-moxibustion in treating irritable bowel syndrome: how does it work?

Authors:  Xiao-Peng Ma; Jue Hong; Cai-Ping An; Dan Zhang; Yan Huang; Huan-Gan Wu; Cui-Hong Zhang; Sian Meeuwsen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Downregulation of mucosal mast cell activation and immune response in diarrhoea-irritable bowel syndrome by oral disodium cromoglycate: A pilot study.

Authors:  Beatriz Lobo; Laura Ramos; Cristina Martínez; Mar Guilarte; Ana M González-Castro; Carmen Alonso-Cotoner; Marc Pigrau; Inés de Torres; Bruno K Rodiño-Janeiro; Eloisa Salvo-Romero; Marina Fortea; Cristina Pardo-Camacho; Danila Guagnozzi; Fernando Azpiroz; Javier Santos; María Vicario
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  Mechanical Skin Injury Promotes Food Anaphylaxis by Driving Intestinal Mast Cell Expansion.

Authors:  Juan-Manuel Leyva-Castillo; Claire Galand; Christy Kam; Oliver Burton; Michael Gurish; Melissa A Musser; Jeffrey D Goldsmith; Elizabeth Hait; Samuel Nurko; Frank Brombacher; Chen Dong; Fred D Finkelman; Richard T Lee; Steven Ziegler; Isaac Chiu; K Frank Austen; Raif S Geha
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 31.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.