OBJECTIVES: There are several studies considering obesity as the risk factor for various lower gastrointestinal symptoms. But the relationship between visceral abdominal obesity and the incidence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is not studied yet. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and the risk of IBS. METHODS: This is a case-control study comparing the VAT area between subjects with IBS (IBS group) and controls without IBS (non IBS group), who underwent abdomen computerized tomography (CT) for routine health checkup from January 2012 to August 2013 in a health promotion center. A telephone survey was retrospectively conducted to diagnose IBS by Rome III criteria. The association between IBS and abdominal obesity was evaluated by measuring VAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), VAT/SAT ratio, body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC). RESULTS: The prevalence of IBS was 19.9% (67/336) among all enrolled subjects. In the univariate analysis, VAT area, VAT/SAT ratio, waist circumference, the presence of reflux esophagitis and the ratio of females were significantly higher in the IBS group than in the non IBS group. However, a higher BMI or a higher SAT area is not associated with an increased risk of IBS. In the multivariate analysis, a higher VAT area (odds ratio (OR)=9.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.90-30.64, highest tertile vs. lowest tertile, P=0.001), VAT/SAT ratio (OR=10.15, 95% CI: 3.05-33.58, highest tertile vs. lowest tertile, P=0.001) and waist circumference (OR=7.81, 95% CI: 2.13-28.66, highest tertile vs. lowest tertile, P=0.002) were independently associated with a risk of IBS. Only in the IBS-D group, not in the IBS-C, visceral adiposity was associated with an increased risk of IBS. CONCLUSIONS: Visceral adiposity measured by VAT, VAT/SAT, and waist circumference is associated with an increased risk of IBS, especially of IBS-D. However, neither SAT nor BMI are associated with an increased risk of IBS.
OBJECTIVES: There are several studies considering obesity as the risk factor for various lower gastrointestinal symptoms. But the relationship between visceral abdominal obesity and the incidence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is not studied yet. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and the risk of IBS. METHODS: This is a case-control study comparing the VAT area between subjects with IBS (IBS group) and controls without IBS (non IBS group), who underwent abdomen computerized tomography (CT) for routine health checkup from January 2012 to August 2013 in a health promotion center. A telephone survey was retrospectively conducted to diagnose IBS by Rome III criteria. The association between IBS and abdominal obesity was evaluated by measuring VAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), VAT/SAT ratio, body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC). RESULTS: The prevalence of IBS was 19.9% (67/336) among all enrolled subjects. In the univariate analysis, VAT area, VAT/SAT ratio, waist circumference, the presence of reflux esophagitis and the ratio of females were significantly higher in the IBS group than in the non IBS group. However, a higher BMI or a higher SAT area is not associated with an increased risk of IBS. In the multivariate analysis, a higher VAT area (odds ratio (OR)=9.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.90-30.64, highest tertile vs. lowest tertile, P=0.001), VAT/SAT ratio (OR=10.15, 95% CI: 3.05-33.58, highest tertile vs. lowest tertile, P=0.001) and waist circumference (OR=7.81, 95% CI: 2.13-28.66, highest tertile vs. lowest tertile, P=0.002) were independently associated with a risk of IBS. Only in the IBS-D group, not in the IBS-C, visceral adiposity was associated with an increased risk of IBS. CONCLUSIONS: Visceral adiposity measured by VAT, VAT/SAT, and waist circumference is associated with an increased risk of IBS, especially of IBS-D. However, neither SAT nor BMI are associated with an increased risk of IBS.
Authors: Ulrich Kintscher; Martin Hartge; Katharina Hess; Anna Foryst-Ludwig; Markus Clemenz; Martin Wabitsch; Pamela Fischer-Posovszky; Thomas F E Barth; Duska Dragun; Thomas Skurk; Hans Hauner; Matthias Blüher; Thomas Unger; Anna-Maria Wolf; Uwe Knippschild; Vinzenz Hombach; Nikolaus Marx Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2008-04-17 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Aaron M Magnuson; Daniel P Regan; Andrea D Booth; Josephine K Fouts; Claudia M Solt; Jessica L Hill; Steve W Dow; Michelle T Foster Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Stephan C Bischoff; Rocco Barazzoni; Luca Busetto; Marjo Campmans-Kuijpers; Vincenzo Cardinale; Irit Chermesh; Ahad Eshraghian; Haluk Tarik Kani; Wafaa Khannoussi; Laurence Lacaze; Miguel Léon-Sanz; Juan M Mendive; Michael W Müller; Johann Ockenga; Frank Tacke; Anders Thorell; Darija Vranesic Bender; Arved Weimann; Cristina Cuerda Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 6.866
Authors: Jasmine K Zia; Adrienne Lenhart; Pei-Lin Yang; Margaret M Heitkemper; Jason Baker; Laurie Keefer; Miguel Saps; Callie Cuff; Gregory Hungria; Elizabeth J Videlock; Lin Chang Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 33.883
Authors: Kewin T H Siah; Reuben K Wong; Yiong H Chan; Khek Y Ho; Kok-Ann Gwee Journal: J Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2016-10-30 Impact factor: 4.924
Authors: LeeAnne B Sherwin; Onyinyechi M Ozoji; Christina M Boulineaux; Paule V Joseph; Nicolaas H Fourie; Sarah K Abey; Xuemin Zhang; Wendy A Henderson Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Yves M Borbély; Alice Osterwalder; Dino Kröll; Philipp C Nett; Roman A Inglin Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 5.742