| Literature DB >> 23666546 |
Orhan Ozatik1, Yunus Aydin, Hikmet Hassa, Dilek Ulusoy, Serdal Ogut, Fezan Sahin.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between serum total oxidant (TOS) and antioxidant (TAS) levels and clinical pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23666546 PMCID: PMC3696458 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-0005-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet ISSN: 1058-0468 Impact factor: 3.412
The demographic characteristics of the study population
| Clinically pregnant ( | Clinically non-pregnant ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female age (years) | 31.5 ± 3.9 | 32 ± 3.2 | NS |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.4 ± 2.9 | 24.2 ± 2.1 | NS |
| Duration of infertility (years) | 3.1 ± 1.9 | 2.9 ± 2.0 | NS |
| Basal FSH (mIU/ml) | 7.1 ± 2.1 | 8.3 ± 1.6 | NS |
| Basal LH (mIU/ml) | 5.1 ± 1.2 | 4.7 ± 1.4 | NS |
| Basal estradiol (pg/ml) | 37 ± 7 | 36 ± 9 | NS |
| Basal antral follicle count | 9 ± 2.1 | 10 ± 1.9 | NS |
| Number of retrieved oocytes | 15 ± 4.1 | 14 ± 4.9 | NS |
| Fertilization rate (%) | 85 ± 6.1 | 79 ± 4.9 | NS |
| Number of day-3 grade I+II embryos | 7 ± 2.3 | 6 ± 3.0 | NS |
| Number of transferred embryos | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | NS |
Data are represented with the form of the Mean ± Standard Deviation (SD)
BMI Body Mass Index; FSH Follicle Stimulating Hormone; LH Luteinizing Hormone; NS Non-significant
P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant
TAS and TOS levels before-after oocyte collection, before-after embryo transfer in clinically pregnant and non-pregnant women
| Clinically pregnant ( | Clinically non-pregnant ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAS before OPU | 1,70(1,55–1,70) | 1,55(1,54–1,59) | 0.035 |
| TAS after OPU | 1,66(1,58–1,68) | 1,58(1,57–1,62) | 0,010 |
| TOS before OPU | 1,66(1,58–1,68) | 1,60(1,54–1,62) | 0.092 |
| TOS after OPU | 1,63±,057 | 1,58±,050 | 0,013 |
| TAS before ET | 1,65±,072 | 1,59±,054 | 0,022 |
| TAS after ET | 1,68±,059 | 1,62±,052 | 0.010 |
| TOS before ET | 1,65±,063 | 1,58±,062 | 0.014 |
| TOS after ET | 1,62±,061 | 1,57±,066 | 0.065 |
For normally distributed variables Mean ± Standard Deviation (SD) values were given, for non-normally distributed variables median (25 %–75 %) percentiles were given
Serum total anti-oxidant (TAS) in mmol Trolox Eq/L unit and serum total oxidant (TOS) in μmol H2O2 Eq/L unit
OPU oocyte pick-up, ET embryo transfer
P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant
Fig. 1Serum total antioxidant status (TAS) levels in clinically pregnant and non-pregnant women around oocyte collection and embryo transfer
Comparison of TOS and TAS levels in different phases during COH cycles in clinically pregnant patients
| Phases of cycle | ||
|---|---|---|
| TOS levels |
| |
| Before OPU-after OPU | 1,61±,061–1,63±,057 | 0.014 |
| Before ET-after ET | 1,65±,063–1,62±,061 | 0,003 |
| Before OPU-after ET | 1,61±,061–1,62±,061 | 0.528 |
| TAS levels |
| |
| Before OPU-after OPU | 1,64±,075–1,64±,049 | 0,831 |
| Before ET-after ET | 1,68(1,57–1,72)–1,71(1,63–1,74) | 0.007 |
| Before OPU-after ET | 1,64±,075–1,68±,059 | 0.003 |
For normally distributed variables Mean ± Standard Deviation (SD) values were given, for non-normally distributed variables median (25 %–75 %) percentiles were given
Serum total anti-oxidant (TAS) in mmol Trolox Eq/L unit and serum total oxidant (TOS) in μmol H2O2 Eq/L unit
OPU oocyte pick-up, ET embryo transfer
P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant
Comparison of TOS and TAS levels in different phases during COH cycles of clinically non-pregnant patients
| TOS levels |
| |
| Before OPU-after OPU | 1,57±,046–1,58±,050 | 0.778 |
| Before ET-after ET | 1,60(1,54–1,62)–1,58(1,52–1,60) | 0,020 |
| Before OPU-after ET | 1,57±,046–1,57±,066 | 0.552 |
| TAS levels |
| |
| Before OPU-after OPU | 1,57±,053–1,59±,043 | 0,017 |
| Before ET-after ET | 1,59±,054–1,62±,052 | <0.001 |
| Before OPU-after ET | 1,57±,053–1,62±,052 | <0.001 |
For normally distributed variables Mean ± Standard Deviation (SD) values were given, for non-normally distributed variables median (25 %–75 %) percentiles were given
Serum total anti-oxidant (TAS) in mmol Trolox Eq/L unit and serum total oxidant (TOS) in μmol H2O2 Eq/L unit
OPU oocyte pick-up, ET embryo transfer
P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant
OSI in different phases during COH cycles in clinically pregnant and non-pregnant women
| OSI | Clinically pregnant ( | Clinically non-pregnant ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Before OPU | 0,970(0,976–1,000) | 1,006(0,987–1,012) | 0.008 |
| After OPU | 1,000(0,984–1,008) | 0,990(0,976–1,009) | 0,555 |
| Before ET | 0,994(0,994–1,003) | 0,997(0,987–1,006) | 0.688 |
| After ET | 0,965(0,947–0,971) | 0,963(0,950–0,979) | 0,832 |
Median (25 %–75 %) percentiles were given
Differences were evaluated with Mann–Whitney U test
OPU oocyte pick-up, ET embryo transfer, OSI oxidative stress index
P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant
Fig. 2ROC curve analysis for OSI before OPU. Sensitivity and specificity rates were given for pre-OPU OSI value which was significant for predicting clinical pregnancy and AUC was 0.806 (95%CI, 0.617–0.928) with p = 0.001. Pre-OPU OSI as in mmol Trolox Eq/μmol H2O2 Eq. (OPU; oocyte pick-up, OSI; oxidative stress index)
Fig. 3ROC Curve analysis for measured variables that were significant for predicting clinical pregnancy. Significant critical cut-off values of TAS and TOS in different phases of COH cycle were given with sensitivity and specificity rates; a TAS prior to OPU, b TAS after OPU, c TAS before ET, d TAS after ET, e TOS after OUP, f TOS before ET. Serum total anti-oxidant (TAS) in mmol Trolox Eq/L unit and serum total oxidant (TOS) in μmol H2O2 Eq/L unit. OPU; oocyte pick-up, ET; embryo transfer