OBJECTIVE: To assess salivary stress biomarkers (cortisol and α-amylase) and female fecundity. DESIGN: Prospective cohort design. SETTING: United Kingdom. PATIENT(S): 274 women aged 18 to 40 years who were attempting pregnancy. INTERVENTION(S): Observation for six cycles or until pregnancy: women collected basal saliva samples on day 6 of each cycle, and used fertility monitors to identify ovulation and pregnancy test kits for pregnancy detection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Salivary cortisol (μg/dL) and α-amylase (U/mL) concentration measurements; fecundity measured by time-to-pregnancy and the probability of pregnancy during the fertile window as estimated from discrete-time survival and Bayesian modeling techniques, respectively. RESULT(S): Alpha-amylase but not cortisol concentrations were negatively associated with fecundity in the first cycle (fecundity odds ratio=0.85; 95% confidence interval 0.67, 1.09) after adjusting for the couples' ages, intercourse frequency, and alcohol consumption. Statistically significant reductions in the probability of conception across the fertile window during the first cycle attempting pregnancy were observed for women whose salivary concentrations of α-amylase were in the upper quartiles in comparison with women in the lower quartiles (highest posterior density: -0.284; 95% interval -0.540, -0.029). CONCLUSION(S): Stress significantly reduced the probability of conception each day during the fertile window, possibly exerting its effect through the sympathetic medullar pathway. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVE: To assess salivary stress biomarkers (cortisol and α-amylase) and female fecundity. DESIGN: Prospective cohort design. SETTING: United Kingdom. PATIENT(S): 274 women aged 18 to 40 years who were attempting pregnancy. INTERVENTION(S): Observation for six cycles or until pregnancy: women collected basal saliva samples on day 6 of each cycle, and used fertility monitors to identify ovulation and pregnancy test kits for pregnancy detection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Salivary cortisol (μg/dL) and α-amylase (U/mL) concentration measurements; fecundity measured by time-to-pregnancy and the probability of pregnancy during the fertile window as estimated from discrete-time survival and Bayesian modeling techniques, respectively. RESULT(S): Alpha-amylase but not cortisol concentrations were negatively associated with fecundity in the first cycle (fecundity odds ratio=0.85; 95% confidence interval 0.67, 1.09) after adjusting for the couples' ages, intercourse frequency, and alcohol consumption. Statistically significant reductions in the probability of conception across the fertile window during the first cycle attempting pregnancy were observed for women whose salivary concentrations of α-amylase were in the upper quartiles in comparison with women in the lower quartiles (highest posterior density: -0.284; 95% interval -0.540, -0.029). CONCLUSION(S): Stress significantly reduced the probability of conception each day during the fertile window, possibly exerting its effect through the sympathetic medullar pathway. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Cecilia Pyper; Lise Bromhall; Sarah Dummett; Douglas G Altman; Pat Brownbill; Michael Murphy Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: J M J Smeenk; C M Verhaak; A J J M Vingerhoets; C G J Sweep; J M W M Merkus; S J Willemsen; A van Minnen; H Straatman; D D M Braat Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2005-01-21 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: N H Hjollund; T K Jensen; J P Bonde; T B Henriksen; A M Andersson; H A Kolstad; E Ernst; A Giwercman; N E Skakkebaek; J Olsen Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Urs M Nater; Nicolas Rohleder; Jens Gaab; Simona Berger; Andreas Jud; Clemens Kirschbaum; Ulrike Ehlert Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 2.997
Authors: Hillary F Huber; McKenna M Considine; Susan Jenkins; Cun Li; Peter W Nathanielsz Journal: J Med Primatol Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 0.667
Authors: Jacqueline D Kloss; Michael L Perlis; Jessica A Zamzow; Elizabeth J Culnan; Clarisa R Gracia Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2014-10-18 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; J C Trussell; LaTasha B Craig; Clarisa Gracia; Hao Huang; Ruben Alvero; Peter Casson; Gregory Christman; Christos Coutifaris; Michael Diamond; Susan Jin; Richard S Legro; Randal D Robinson; William D Schlaff; Heping Zhang Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Amelia K Wesselink; Elizabeth E Hatch; Kenneth J Rothman; Jennifer L Weuve; Ann Aschengrau; Rebecca J Song; Lauren A Wise Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Asha Mamgain; India L Sawyer; David A M Timajo; Mohammed Z Rizwan; Maggie C Evans; Caroline M Ancel; Megan A Inglis; Greg M Anderson Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Jihye Park; Joseph B Stanford; Christina A Porucznik; Kylie Christensen; Karen C Schliep Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Karen C Schliep; Sunni L Mumford; Catherine J Vladutiu; Katherine A Ahrens; Neil J Perkins; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Kerri A Kissell; Ankita Prasad; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Enrique F Schisterman Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Rebecca J Chason; Alexander C McLain; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Zhen Chen; James H Segars; Cecilia Pyper; Germaine M Buck Louis Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 7.329