Breelyn A Wilky1, Christian F Meyer, Jonathan C Trent. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: After failure of standard therapy, few effective treatment options exist for adult patients with metastatic sarcomas, and median survival remains dismal at approximately 1 year. Pazopanib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has recently been approved for nonadipocytic soft tissue sarcomas refractory to chemotherapy. In this review, we will revisit the efficacy of pazopanib in sarcomas, and present a patient case that illustrates two of many unanswered questions: which sarcoma patients are most likely to benefit from pazopanib therapy, and what criteria are best suited to accurately detect benefit in clinical trials? RECENT FINDINGS: Pazopanib has been tested in sarcoma patients in a phase II and phase III study, and was shown to prolong progression-free survival by 3 months relative to placebo. Although histology has been the primary stratification variable for subgroup analysis in large sarcoma trials, the PALETTE study did not demonstrate superior response within histologic cohorts. Ongoing trials seek to explore efficacy of pazopanib in previously excluded histologies, as well as include correlative studies to identify histologic and molecular biomarkers to predict patients likely to benefit. SUMMARY: Pazopanib has been proven to provide modest benefit overall to nonadipocytic soft tissue sarcoma patients, but we have yet to identify the molecular basis for those patients who derive exceptional benefit.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: After failure of standard therapy, few effective treatment options exist for adult patients with metastatic sarcomas, and median survival remains dismal at approximately 1 year. Pazopanib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has recently been approved for nonadipocytic soft tissue sarcomas refractory to chemotherapy. In this review, we will revisit the efficacy of pazopanib in sarcomas, and present a patient case that illustrates two of many unanswered questions: which sarcomapatients are most likely to benefit from pazopanib therapy, and what criteria are best suited to accurately detect benefit in clinical trials? RECENT FINDINGS:Pazopanib has been tested in sarcomapatients in a phase II and phase III study, and was shown to prolong progression-free survival by 3 months relative to placebo. Although histology has been the primary stratification variable for subgroup analysis in large sarcoma trials, the PALETTE study did not demonstrate superior response within histologic cohorts. Ongoing trials seek to explore efficacy of pazopanib in previously excluded histologies, as well as include correlative studies to identify histologic and molecular biomarkers to predict patients likely to benefit. SUMMARY:Pazopanib has been proven to provide modest benefit overall to nonadipocytic soft tissue sarcomapatients, but we have yet to identify the molecular basis for those patients who derive exceptional benefit.
Authors: Winette T A van der Graaf; Jean-Yves Blay; Sant P Chawla; Dong-Wan Kim; Binh Bui-Nguyen; Paolo G Casali; Patrick Schöffski; Massimo Aglietta; Arthur P Staddon; Yasuo Beppu; Axel Le Cesne; Hans Gelderblom; Ian R Judson; Nobuhito Araki; Monia Ouali; Sandrine Marreaud; Rachel Hodge; Mohammed R Dewji; Corneel Coens; George D Demetri; Christopher D Fletcher; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Peter Hohenberger Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Petros G Nikolinakos; Nasser Altorki; David Yankelevitz; Hai T Tran; Shaoyu Yan; Dilip Rajagopalan; Walter Bordogna; Lone H Ottesen; John V Heymach Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Fabio M Iwamoto; Kathleen R Lamborn; H Ian Robins; Minesh P Mehta; Susan M Chang; Nicholas A Butowski; Lisa M Deangelis; Lauren E Abrey; Wei-Ting Zhang; Michael D Prados; Howard A Fine Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2010-03-03 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Rakesh Kumar; Victoria B Knick; Sharon K Rudolph; Jennifer H Johnson; Renae M Crosby; Ming-Chih Crouthamel; Teresa M Hopper; Charles G Miller; Laura E Harrington; James A Onori; Robert J Mullin; Tona M Gilmer; Anne T Truesdale; Andrea H Epperly; Amogh Boloor; Jeffrey A Stafford; Deirdre K Luttrell; Mui Cheung Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless; Anette Duensing; Laura McGreevey; Chang-Jie Chen; Nora Joseph; Samuel Singer; Diana J Griffith; Andrea Haley; Ajia Town; George D Demetri; Christopher D M Fletcher; Jonathan A Fletcher Journal: Science Date: 2003-01-09 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Cristina R Antonescu; Akihiko Yoshida; Tianhuo Guo; Ning-En Chang; Lei Zhang; Narasimhan P Agaram; Li-Xuan Qin; Murray F Brennan; Samuel Singer; Robert G Maki Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: S Sleijfer; T Gorlia; C Lamers; H Burger; J-Y Blay; A Le Cesne; M Scurr; F Collin; L Pandite; S Marreaud; P Hohenberger Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Seyedmehrad Tavallai; Hossein A Hamed; Steven Grant; Andrew Poklepovic; Paul Dent Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Cem Mirili; Semra Paydaş; Isa B Guney; Ali Ogul; Serkan Gokcay; Mahmut Buyuksimsek; Abdullah E Yetisir; Bilgin Karaalioglu; Mert Tohumcuoglu; Gulsah Seydaoglu Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 3.989