Patient attitudes toward transaxillary robot-assisted thyroidectomy.

BACKGROUND: The transaxillary robot-assisted technique constitutes an acceptable treatment option for patients requiring thyroidectomy. However, patients' attitudes toward this new technique have not yet been analyzed.
METHODS: A sample of 596 randomly selected patients who underwent thyroidectomy between January 2000 and March 2010 was assessed. We evaluated patients' attitudes toward transaxillary robot-assisted thyroidectomy, taking into account the validated Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire, the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire, and 11 sociodemographic and surgical patient characteristics.
RESULTS: Only 11.6 % of the patients would prefer to have been treated with the transaxillary method. Most patients had concerns that it would be a more painful procedure (39.2 %), and they expressed satisfaction with the existing esthetic outcome (29.1 %); other concerns were that the robotic approach would be of longer duration (25.4 %) and at higher cost (15.5 %). Nevertheless, the worse the appearance of the neck scar the more preferable is the new method (p = 0.025), a result that holds true irrespective of patients' physical health, the invasive procedure attained (conventional or minimal), and the presence of postoperative complications, among other characteristics. Patients diagnosed with a benign or uncertain neoplasm (p = 0.022) and younger patients (p = 0.003) held a more positive view of the new method.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have undergone conventional thyroidectomy via the usual neck incision do not express a preference for the transaxillary method. The reasons given include various perceived disadvantages of the robotic procedure (increased pain, longer operative times, and higher cost). Younger patients, patients with poor appearance of their neck scar, and patients with benign thyroid pathology seem to hold a more positive attitude toward the robotic approach.