BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colorectal tumors have a large degree of molecular heterogeneity. Three integrated pathways of carcinogenesis (ie, traditional, alternate, and serrated) have been proposed, based on specific combinations of microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and mutations in BRAF and KRAS. We used resources from the population-based Iowa Women's Health Study (n = 41,836) to associate markers of colorectal tumors, integrated pathways, and clinical and pathology characteristics, including survival times. METHODS: We assessed archived specimens from 732 incident colorectal tumors and characterized them as microsatellite stable (MSS), MSI high or MSI low, CIMP high or CIMP low, CIMP negative, and positive or negative for BRAF and/or KRAS mutations. Informative marker data were collected from 563 tumors (77%), which were assigned to the following integrated pathways: traditional (MSS, CIMP negative, BRAF mutation negative, and KRAS mutation negative; n = 170), alternate (MSS, CIMP low, BRAF mutation negative, and KRAS mutation positive; n = 58), serrated (any MSI, CIMP high, BRAF mutation positive, and KRAS mutation negative; n = 142), or unassigned (n = 193). Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the associations of interest. RESULTS: Patients' mean age (P = .03) and tumors' anatomic subsite (P = .0001) and grade (P = .0001) were significantly associated with integrated pathway assignment. Colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality was not associated with the traditional, alternate, or serrated pathways, but was associated with a subset of pathway-unassigned tumors (MSS or MSI low, CIMP negative, BRAF mutation negative, and KRAS mutation positive) (n = 96 cases; relative risk = 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.89, compared with the traditional pathway). CONCLUSIONS: We identified clinical and pathology features associated with molecularly defined CRC subtypes. However, additional studies are needed to determine how these features might influence prognosis.
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Colorectal tumors have a large degree of molecular heterogeneity. Three integrated pathways of carcinogenesis (ie, traditional, alternate, and serrated) have been proposed, based on specific combinations of microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and mutations in BRAF and KRAS. We used resources from the population-based Iowa Women's Health Study (n = 41,836) to associate markers of colorectal tumors, integrated pathways, and clinical and pathology characteristics, including survival times. METHODS: We assessed archived specimens from 732 incident colorectal tumors and characterized them as microsatellite stable (MSS), MSI high or MSI low, CIMP high or CIMP low, CIMP negative, and positive or negative for BRAF and/or KRAS mutations. Informative marker data were collected from 563 tumors (77%), which were assigned to the following integrated pathways: traditional (MSS, CIMP negative, BRAF mutation negative, and KRAS mutation negative; n = 170), alternate (MSS, CIMP low, BRAF mutation negative, and KRAS mutation positive; n = 58), serrated (any MSI, CIMP high, BRAF mutation positive, and KRAS mutation negative; n = 142), or unassigned (n = 193). Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the associations of interest. RESULTS:Patients' mean age (P = .03) and tumors' anatomic subsite (P = .0001) and grade (P = .0001) were significantly associated with integrated pathway assignment. Colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality was not associated with the traditional, alternate, or serrated pathways, but was associated with a subset of pathway-unassigned tumors (MSS or MSI low, CIMP negative, BRAF mutation negative, and KRAS mutation positive) (n = 96 cases; relative risk = 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.89, compared with the traditional pathway). CONCLUSIONS: We identified clinical and pathology features associated with molecularly defined CRC subtypes. However, additional studies are needed to determine how these features might influence prognosis.
Authors: Shuji Ogino; Katsuhiko Nosho; Gregory J Kirkner; Takako Kawasaki; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Massimo Loda; Edward L Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs Journal: Gut Date: 2008-10-02 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Wade S Samowitz; Hans Albertsen; Carol Sweeney; Jennifer Herrick; Bette J Caan; Kristin E Anderson; Roger K Wolff; Martha L Slattery Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-12-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Toshinori Hinoue; Daniel J Weisenberger; Christopher P E Lange; Hui Shen; Hyang-Min Byun; David Van Den Berg; Simeen Malik; Fei Pan; Houtan Noushmehr; Cornelis M van Dijk; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Peter W Laird Journal: Genome Res Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Matthew F Kalady; Kathryn L Dejulius; Julian A Sanchez; Awad Jarrar; Xiuli Liu; Elena Manilich; Marek Skacel; James M Church Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: A Chao; F Gilliland; C Willman; N Joste; I M Chen; N Stone; J Ruschulte; D Viswanatha; P Duncan; R Ming; R Hoffman; E Foucar; C Key Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Leonard L Gunderson; John Milburn Jessup; Daniel J Sargent; Frederick L Greene; Andrew K Stewart Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ludovic Barault; Céline Charon-Barra; Valérie Jooste; Mathilde Funes de la Vega; Laurent Martin; Patrick Roignot; Patrick Rat; Anne-Marie Bouvier; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Jean Faivre; Caroline Chapusot; Francoise Piard Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Anna E Prizment; Robert A Vierkant; Thomas C Smyrk; Lori S Tillmans; Heather H Nelson; Charles F Lynch; Thomas Pengo; Stephen N Thibodeau; Timothy R Church; James R Cerhan; Kristin E Anderson; Paul J Limburg Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: N Jewel Samadder; Lisa Pappas; Kenneth M Boucherr; Ken R Smith; Heidi Hanson; Alison Fraser; Yuan Wan; Randall W Burt; Karen Curtin Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Raaj S Mehta; Mingyang Song; Reiko Nishihara; David A Drew; Kana Wu; Zhi Rong Qian; Teresa T Fung; Tsuyoshi Hamada; Yohei Masugi; Annacarolina da Silva; Yan Shi; Wanwan Li; Mancang Gu; Walter C Willett; Charles S Fuchs; Edward L Giovannucci; Shuji Ogino; Andrew T Chan Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Rondell P Graham; Robert A Vierkant; Lori S Tillmans; Alice H Wang; Peter W Laird; Daniel J Weisenberger; Charles F Lynch; Amy J French; Susan L Slager; Yassaman Raissian; Joaquin J Garcia; Sarah E Kerr; Hee Eun Lee; Stephen N Thibodeau; James R Cerhan; Paul J Limburg; Thomas C Smyrk Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Paul Lochhead; Andrew T Chan; Edward Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs; Kana Wu; Reiko Nishihara; Michael O'Brien; Shuji Ogino Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Amanda I Phipps; Paul J Limburg; John A Baron; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Daniel J Weisenberger; Peter W Laird; Frank A Sinicrope; Christophe Rosty; Daniel D Buchanan; John D Potter; Polly A Newcomb Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Frank A Sinicrope; Qian Shi; Thomas C Smyrk; Stephen N Thibodeau; Rodrigo Dienstmann; Justin Guinney; Brian M Bot; Sabine Tejpar; Mauro Delorenzi; Richard M Goldberg; Michelle Mahoney; Daniel J Sargent; Steven R Alberts Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 22.682