Literature DB >> 18922929

Hypermethylator phenotype in sporadic colon cancer: study on a population-based series of 582 cases.

Ludovic Barault1, Céline Charon-Barra, Valérie Jooste, Mathilde Funes de la Vega, Laurent Martin, Patrick Roignot, Patrick Rat, Anne-Marie Bouvier, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Jean Faivre, Caroline Chapusot, Francoise Piard.   

Abstract

The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) is a distinct phenotype in colorectal cancer, associated with specific clinical, pathologic, and molecular features. However, most of the studies stratified methylation according to two subgroups (CIMP-High versus No-CIMP/CIMP-Low). In our study, we defined three different subgroups of methylation (No-CIMP, CIMP-Low, and CIMP-High) and evaluated the prognostic significance of methylation status on a population-based series of sporadic colon cancers. A total of 582 colon adenocarcinomas were evaluated using methylation-specific PCR for 5 markers (hMLH1, P16, MINT1, MINT2, and MINT31). No-CIMP status was defined as no methylated locus, CIMP-Low status as one to three methylated loci, and CIMP-High status as four or five methylated loci. Clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics were correlated to the methylation status. Crude and relative survival was compared according to methylation status. In the microsatellite-stable (MSS) group, CIMP-High was significantly associated with proximal location (P = 0.011) and BRAF mutation (P < 0.001). KRAS mutations were more associated with CIMP-High and CIMP-Low status (P = 0.008). A shorter 5-year survival was observed in MSS cancer patients with CIMP-Low or CIMP-High status. These results remained significant in multivariate analysis adjusted for age, stage, and BRAF and KRAS mutational status [CIMP-Low: hazard ratio (HR), 1.85; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.37-2.51; CIMP-High, HR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.53-5.49 compared with No-CIMP]. Within the high-level microsatellite instability group, no difference in survival was observed between the different CIMP groups. Our results show the interest of defining three subgroups of patients according to their methylation status (No-CIMP/CIMP-Low/CIMP-High). Methylation is an independent prognostic factor in MSS colon cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18922929     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  148 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal cancer molecular biology moves into clinical practice.

Authors:  Colin C Pritchard; William M Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Predictive and prognostic roles of BRAF mutation in stage III colon cancer: results from intergroup trial CALGB 89803.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Kaori Shima; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Nadine J McCleary; Kimmie Ng; Donna Hollis; Leonard B Saltz; Robert J Mayer; Paul Schaefer; Renaud Whittom; Alexander Hantel; Al B Benson; Donna Spiegelman; Richard M Goldberg; Monica M Bertagnolli; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  No evidence for interference of h&e staining in DNA testing: usefulness of DNA extraction from H&E-stained archival tissue sections.

Authors:  Teppei Morikawa; Kaori Shima; Aya Kuchiba; Mai Yamauchi; Noriko Tanaka; Yu Imamura; Xiaoyun Liao; Zhi Rong Qian; Mohan Brahmandam; Janina A Longtine; Neal I Lindeman; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 4.  BRAF mutant colorectal cancer as a distinct subset of colorectal cancer: clinical characteristics, clinical behavior, and response to targeted therapies.

Authors:  Callisia N Clarke; E Scott Kopetz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12

5.  CpG island methylator phenotype is associated with the efficacy of sequential oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy and EGFR-related gene mutation in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xiaofei Zhang; Hideki Shimodaira; Hiroshi Soeda; Keigo Komine; Hidekazu Takahashi; Kota Ouchi; Masahiro Inoue; Masanobu Takahashi; Shin Takahashi; Chikashi Ishioka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  5-Fluorouracil adjuvant chemotherapy does not increase survival in patients with CpG island methylator phenotype colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Jover; Thuy-Phuong Nguyen; Lucía Pérez-Carbonell; Pedro Zapater; Artemio Payá; Cristina Alenda; Estefanía Rojas; Joaquín Cubiella; Francesc Balaguer; Juan D Morillas; Juan Clofent; Luis Bujanda; Josep M Reñé; Xavier Bessa; Rosa M Xicola; David Nicolás-Pérez; Antoni Castells; Montserrat Andreu; Xavier Llor; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  Epigenetics and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Victoria Valinluck Lao; William M Grady
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Diagnostic utility of MS-MLPA in DNA methylation profiling of adenocarcinomas and neuroendocrine carcinomas of the colon-rectum.

Authors:  Daniela Furlan; Nora Sahnane; Mara Mazzoni; Roberta Pastorino; Ileana Carnevali; Michele Stefanoli; Andrea Ferretti; Anna Maria Chiaravalli; Stefano La Rosa; Carlo Capella
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 9.  Molecular origins of cancer: Molecular basis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sanford D Markowitz; Monica M Bertagnolli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Differences in epidemiologic risk factors for colorectal adenomas and serrated polyps by lesion severity and anatomical site.

Authors:  Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Michael N Passarelli; Scott V Adams; Melissa P Upton; Lee-Ching Zhu; John D Potter; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.