Literature DB >> 23664857

In vivo γ-irradiation low dose threshold for suppression of DNA double strand breaks below the spontaneous level in mouse blood and spleen cells.

Andreyan N Osipov1, Galina Buleeva, Ekaterina Arkhangelskaya, Dmitry Klokov.   

Abstract

There is a considerable controversy as to whether DNA damage induced by low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation is treated by cellular defence mechanisms in ways similar to that induced at high doses and high dose rates, and what downstream delayed effects may be caused by low doses compared to moderate and high doses. This constitutes the major challenge for the linear no-threshold model currently used for radiological risk estimates. Among the various DNA lesions induced by ionizing radiation, DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are considered the most important due to their potential to cause cell death, mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. This study examined the accumulation of DNA DSBs in mouse blood leucocytes and splenocytes after long-term, chronic low dose γ-irradiation in vivo, and how this exposure may alter cell sensitivity to acute high dose irradiation. Animals were irradiated for 40, 80 or 120 days at a dose rate of 0.15mGy/h, with total accumulated doses of 144, 288 and 432mGy. DNA DSBs were measured in blood leucocytes and splenocytes using the neutral comet assay. We found that after an initial slight increase in the level of DNA DSBs at 40 days of exposure compared to controls, there was a subsequent drop after either 80 (P<0.01) or 120 days of exposure (P=0.066 for blood leucocytes; P=0.024 for splenocytes). Interestingly, the DNA breaks level after both 80 and 120 days of exposure was lower than in control. Similarly, the cells exposed to the chronic radiation for 80 and 120 days were less sensitive to the induction of DNA DSBs by acute 4Gy irradiation, whereas 40 days of exposure did not significantly modify the radiosensitivity. Our results indirectly indicate that low level ionizing radiation in vivo may trigger inducible repair of both endogenous and exogenous DNA DSBs, and that there is a dose threshold for this inducible defence mechanism, below which it does not occur. These data provide new evidence, now at the molecular level in vivo, that the dose-response for DNA DSBs at very low doses and dose rates is not linear. Crown
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic irradiation; DNA breaks; In vivo; Non-linearity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23664857     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  19 in total

1.  Low dose radiation adaptive protection to control neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Mohan Doss
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Correcting systemic deficiencies in our scientific infrastructure.

Authors:  Mohan Doss
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Restoration of Cognitive Performance in Mice Carrying a Deficient Allele of 8-Oxoguanine DNA Glycosylase by X-ray Irradiation.

Authors:  Tim Hofer; Nur Duale; Martine Muusse; Dag Marcus Eide; Hildegunn Dahl; Fernando Boix; Jannike M Andersen; Ann Karin Olsen; Oddvar Myhre
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.911

Review 4.  Effects of low dose and low dose rate low linear energy transfer radiation on animals - review of recent studies relevant for carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Tatjana Paunesku; Aleksandra Stevanović; Jelena Popović; Gayle E Woloschak
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Low doses of X-rays induce prolonged and ATM-independent persistence of γH2AX foci in human gingival mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Andreyan N Osipov; Margarita Pustovalova; Anna Grekhova; Petr Eremin; Natalia Vorobyova; Andrey Pulin; Alex Zhavoronkov; Sergey Roumiantsev; Dmitry Y Klokov; Ilya Eremin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-29

6.  Differential Molecular Stress Responses to Low Compared to High Doses of Ionizing Radiation in Normal Human Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Ilya O Velegzhaninov; Dmitry M Shadrin; Yana I Pylina; Anastasia V Ermakova; Olga A Shostal; Elena S Belykh; Anna V Kaneva; Olga V Ermakova; Dmitry Y Klokov
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Activation of homologous recombination DNA repair in human skin fibroblasts continuously exposed to X-ray radiation.

Authors:  Andreyan N Osipov; Anna Grekhova; Margarita Pustovalova; Ivan V Ozerov; Petr Eremin; Natalia Vorobyeva; Natalia Lazareva; Andrey Pulin; Alex Zhavoronkov; Sergey Roumiantsev; Dmitry Klokov; Ilya Eremin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-29

Review 8.  Adaption By Low Dose Radiation Exposure: A Look at Scope and Limitations for Radioprotection.

Authors:  Ron E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Cytogenetic abnormalities in lymphocytes from victims exposed to cobalt-60 radiation.

Authors:  Jia Cao; Jing Zhang; Yan Wang; Li Qing Du; Chang Xu; Qin Wang; Jian Xiang Liu; Xu Su; Fei Yue Fan; Qiang Liu; Sai Jun Fan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  DNA comet Giemsa staining for conventional bright-field microscopy.

Authors:  Andreyan Osipov; Ekaterina Arkhangelskaya; Alexei Vinokurov; Nadezhda Smetaninа; Alex Zhavoronkov; Dmitry Klokov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.