Literature DB >> 23664436

Assessing the impact of dabigatran and warfarin on health-related quality of life: results from an RE-LY sub-study.

B U Monz1, S J Connolly, M Korhonen, H Noack, J Pooley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation is recommended in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to prevent strokes. Vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, are associated with numerous practical limitations--frequent anticoagulation monitoring, lifestyle and dietary restrictions--that complicate patient management and may impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study derived HRQoL estimates for AF patients receiving warfarin or dabigatran etexilate (dabigatran), a new oral anticoagulant not requiring anticoagulation monitoring, during one year of stable treatment, i.e. in the absence of outcome events, such as strokes or major bleedings.
METHODS: Changes in HRQoL over time and between treatments were assessed using the EQ-5D (utility and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores) at baseline, 3 and 12 months in a sub-group of 1435 patients participating in the RE-LY trial. RE-LY was a phase III study that compared the safety and efficacy of warfarin, dabigatran 150 mg bid and dabigatran 110 mg bid for stroke prevention in patients with AF.
RESULTS: Utilities ranged from 0.805 (dabigatran 150 mg bid) to 0.811 (dabigatran 110 mg bid) at baseline, and did not change over the one year observation period. No differences between the dabigatran groups and warfarin were statistically significant except for the dabigatran 150 mg bid group at 3 months. Similarly, none of the within-group or between-group differences in VAS scores were statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Over the course of one year, all anticoagulated patients without outcome events (e.g. strokes or major bleedings) had stable HRQoL. Scores between dabigatran and warfarin were comparable, which was unexpected given the known complexities of warfarin treatment.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Dabigatran; Health-related quality of life; Oral anticoagulation; Warfarin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23664436     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.03.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  22 in total

1.  Patient-reported health preferences of anticoagulant-related outcomes.

Authors:  Ye Wang; Feng Xie; Ming Chai Kong; Lai Heng Lee; Heng Joo Ng; Yu Ko
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Different strategies for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for lower-limb immobilisation after injury: systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Abdullah Pandor; Daniel Horner; Sarah Davis; Steve Goodacre; John W Stevens; Mark Clowes; Beverley J Hunt; Tim Nokes; Jonathan Keenan; Kerstin de Wit
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Patients' perspectives regarding long-term warfarin therapy and the potential transition to new oral anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Gebler-Hughes; Linda Kemp; Malcolm J Bond
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-12

4.  A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes associated with the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Saima Kishvar Afzal; Syed Shahzad Hasan; Zaheer Ud-Din Babar
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Patients satisfaction with warfarin and willingness to switch to dabigatran: a patient survey.

Authors:  Hazem F Elewa; Christina E DeRemer; Kimble Keller; Jaspal Gujral; Thomas V Joshua
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Patient satisfaction with extended-interval warfarin monitoring.

Authors:  Nicholas W Carris; Andrew Y Hwang; Steven M Smith; James R Taylor; Karen Sando; Jason Powell; Eric I Rosenberg; Marc S Zumberg; John G Gums; Eric A Dietrich; Katherine Vogel Anderson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Patient Satisfaction With Extended International Normalized Ratio Follow-up Intervals in a Veteran Population.

Authors:  Rebecca R Schoen; Michael W Nagy; Andrea L Porter; Amanda R Margolis
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Edoxaban versus warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Carla Rognoni; Monia Marchetti; Silvana Quaglini; Nicola Lucio Liberato
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban versus warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Carla Rognoni; Monia Marchetti; Silvana Quaglini; Nicola Lucio Liberato
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.859

10.  New oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists: benefits for health-related quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Josep M Alegret; Xavier Viñolas; Miguel A Arias; Antoni Martínez-Rubio; Pablo Rebollo; Carles Ràfols; José L Martínez-Sande
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.