Literature DB >> 24135964

Apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban versus warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Carla Rognoni1, Monia Marchetti, Silvana Quaglini, Nicola Lucio Liberato.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) increases the risk of systemic thromboembolic events; therefore, anticoagulant treatment with vitamin K antagonists is widely prescribed. Recently, new oral anticoagulants (NOAs) directly inhibiting thrombin (dabigatran) or factor Xa (rivaroxaban and apixaban) demonstrated their non-inferiority with respect to warfarin in reducing the thromboembolic risk. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost effectiveness of NOAs in an Italian setting.
METHODS: A Markov decision model including ten health states and death was developed, and a 3-month Markov cycle and lifetime horizon were adopted. Transition probabilities and quality of life were estimated from three randomized trials and from additional reports in the literature. Analysis was performed in the context of the Italian National Health System. First- and second-order sensitivity analyses were made to test the robustness of the results. The mean European cost of dabigatran (<euro>2.58/day) was assigned to each NOA.
RESULTS: The incremental cost-utility ratio was below <euro>25,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for each NOA and each CHADS2 level, but differences among drugs were found. This result was sensitive to the time in (warfarin) therapeutic range and time horizon.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that NOAs are a cost-effective treatment for the prevention of stroke in patients with NVAF in the Italian healthcare setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24135964     DOI: 10.1007/s40261-013-0144-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  43 in total

1.  Newly identified events in the RE-LY trial.

Authors:  Stuart J Connolly; Michael D Ezekowitz; Salim Yusuf; Paul A Reilly; Lars Wallentin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  James V Freeman; Ruo P Zhu; Douglas K Owens; Alan M Garber; David W Hutton; Alan S Go; Paul J Wang; Mintu P Turakhia
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  A policy model to evaluate the benefits, risks and costs of warfarin pharmacogenomic testing.

Authors:  Lisa M Meckley; James M Gudgeon; Jeffrey L Anderson; Marc S Williams; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants in the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Anuraag R Kansal; Ying Zheng; Tiffany Pokora; Sonja V Sorensen
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 5.  Dabigatran association with higher risk of acute coronary events: meta-analysis of noninferiority randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ken Uchino; Adrian V Hernandez
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-09

6.  The cost effectiveness of anticoagulation management services for patients with atrial fibrillation and at high risk of stroke in the US.

Authors:  Patrick W Sullivan; Thomas W Arant; Samuel L Ellis; Heather Ulrich
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Robert G Hart; Lesly A Pearce; Maria I Aguilar
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Cost-effectiveness of preference-based antithrombotic therapy for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  B F Gage; A B Cardinalli; D K Owens
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Costs of atrial fibrillation in five European countries: results from the Euro Heart Survey on atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Anna Ringborg; Robby Nieuwlaat; Peter Lindgren; Bengt Jönsson; Dogan Fidan; Aldo P Maggioni; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Janina Stepinska; Dennis V Cokkinos; Harry J G M Crijns
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  A comparative analysis of models used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dabigatran versus warfarin for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sonja V Sorensen; Siyang Peng; Brigitta U Monz; Carole Bradley-Kennedy; Anuraag R Kansal
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.981

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Practical issues in the management of novel oral anticoagulants-cardioversion and ablation.

Authors:  Abhishek Maan; E Kevin Heist; Jeremy N Ruskin; Moussa Mansour
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in German patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Alexander Mensch; Stephanie Stock; Björn Stollenwerk; Dirk Müller
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Cost-Effectiveness of Novel Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Sheldon M Singh; Harindra C Wijeysundera
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Updating the Cost Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Based on Varying Stroke and Bleed Risk Profiles.

Authors:  Ching-Yu Wang; Phuong N Pham; Thuy N Thai; Joshua D Brown
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Edoxaban versus warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Carla Rognoni; Monia Marchetti; Silvana Quaglini; Nicola Lucio Liberato
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Thai Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation and a High Risk of Bleeding.

Authors:  Thananan Rattanachotphanit; Chulaporn Limwattananon; Onanong Waleekhachonloet; Phumtham Limwattananon; Kittisak Sawanyawisuth
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with edoxaban compared to warfarin in Germany.

Authors:  Martin Krejczy; Job Harenberg; Martin Wehling; Konrad Obermann; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and atrial fibrillation guidelines in practice: barriers to and strategies for optimal implementation.

Authors:  A John Camm; Fausto J Pinto; Graeme J Hankey; Felicita Andreotti; F D Richard Hobbs
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 9.  Novel oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Rose M F L da Silva
Journal:  Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem       Date:  2014

10.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Oral Anticoagulants in Stroke Prevention among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chia-Te Liao; Mei-Chuan Lee; Zhih-Cherng Chen; Li-Jung Elizabeth Ku; Jung-Der Wang; Han Siong Toh
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.