Literature DB >> 23663118

In vitro chipping behaviour of all-ceramic crowns with a zirconia framework and feldspathic veneering: comparison of CAD/CAM-produced veneer with manually layered veneer.

M Schmitter1, D Mueller, S Rues.   

Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the breaking load of zirconia-based crowns veneered with either CAD/CAM-produced or manually layered feldspathic ceramic. Thirty-two identical zirconia frameworks (Sirona inCoris ZI, mono L F1), 0·6 mm thick with an anatomically shaped occlusal area, were constructed (Sirona inLab 3.80). Sixteen of the crowns were then veneered by the use of CAD/CAM-fabricated feldspathic ceramic (CEREC Bloc, Sirona) and 16 by the use of hand-layered ceramic. The CAD/CAM-manufactured veneer was attached to the frameworks by the use of Panavia 2.0 (Kuraray). Half of the specimens were loaded until failure without artificial ageing; the other half of the specimens underwent thermal cycling and cyclic loading (1·2 million chewing cycles, force magnitude F(max) = 108 N) before the assessment of the ultimate load. To investigate the new technique further, finite element (FE) computations were conducted on the basis of the original geometry. Statistical assessment was made by the use of non-parametric tests. Initial breaking load was significantly higher in the hand-layered group than in the CAD/CAM group (mean: 1165·86 N versus 395·45 N). During chewing simulation, however, 87·5% (7/8) of the crowns in the hand-layered group failed, whereas no crown in the CAD/CAM group failed. The CAD/CAM-produced veneer was significantly less sensitive to ageing than the hand-layered veneer.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23663118     DOI: 10.1111/joor.12061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  6 in total

1.  Mechanical performance of cement- and screw-retained all-ceramic single crowns on dental implants.

Authors:  Matthias Obermeier; Oliver Ristow; Kurt Erdelt; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Clinical performance of screw-retained and cemented implant-supported zirconia single crowns: 36-month results.

Authors:  Claudio Cacaci; Friederike Cantner; Thomas Mücke; Peter Randelzhofer; Jan Hajtó; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Influence of Different Framework Designs on the Fracture Properties of Ceria-Stabilized Tetragonal Zirconia/Alumina-Based All-Ceramic Crowns.

Authors:  Tomofumi Sawada; Sebastian Spintzyk; Christine Schille; Ernst Schweizer; Lutz Scheideler; Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  An in vitro study to compare the surface roughness of glazed and chairside polished dental monolithic zirconia using two polishing systems.

Authors:  Sneha Harishchandra Gaonkar; Meena Ajay Aras; Vidya Chitre
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2020-04-07

Review 5.  Ceramic Materials and Technologies Applied to Digital Works in Implant-Supported Restorative Dentistry.

Authors:  Se-Wook Pyo; Dae-Joon Kim; Jung-Suk Han; In-Sung Luke Yeo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Fracture Resistance of Monolithic High-Translucency Crowns Versus Porcelain-Veneered Zirconia Crowns After Artificial Aging: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Yousef Ezzat; Rayan Sharka; Mohammad Rayyan; Mohammed Al-Rafee
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.