Literature DB >> 23662964

Myopia and international educational performance.

Ian G Morgan1, Kathryn A Rose.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyse the relationship between myopia, educational performance and engagement in after-school tutorial classes.
METHODS: Educational performance data and data on engagement in after-school tutorial classes were taken from the results of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Program in Secondary Assessment (PISA) reports for 2009, which tested educational outcomes in representative samples of 15 year-old school children from 65 jurisdictions. High prevalence of myopia (>70%) and low prevalence of myopia (<40%) locations were identified by systematic literature search.
RESULTS: Six locations with a high prevalence of myopia were identified from among the participants in PISA 2009 - Shanghai-China, Hong Kong-China, Taiwan, Singapore, Japan and South Korea. All were ranked in the top quartile on educational performance. Other participants in the top educational performance quartile were identified as locations with a low prevalence of myopia, including Australia and Finland. The locations with a high prevalence of myopia combined high educational performance and high engagement in after-school tutorials, whereas the locations with a low prevalence of myopia combined high educational performance with little engagement in tutorials. DISCUSSION: These results show that it is possible to achieve high educational outcomes without extensive engagement in after-school tutorials, and that the combination of high educational outcomes with extensive use of tutorials is associated with high prevalence rates of myopia. We suggest that extensive use of after-school tutorials may be a marker of educational environments which impose high educational loads. Further quantification of educational loads to include after- school educational activities, such as homework, tutorials and other after-school classes, as well as formal school classes, is desirable. Policy initiatives to decrease these loads may contribute to the prevention of myopia, perhaps, at least in part, by enabling children to spend more time outdoors. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics
© 2013 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23662964     DOI: 10.1111/opo.12040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  30 in total

1.  Ciliary muscle thickness profiles derived from optical coherence tomography images.

Authors:  Sandra Wagner; Eberhart Zrenner; Torsten Strasser
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  Concise Review: Using Stem Cells to Prevent the Progression of Myopia-A Concept.

Authors:  Miroslaw Janowski; Jeff W M Bulte; James T Handa; David Rini; Piotr Walczak
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 6.277

3.  Brief hyperopic defocus or form deprivation have varying effects on eye growth and ocular rhythms depending on the time-of-day of exposure.

Authors:  Debora L Nickla; Kelsey Jordan; Jane Yang; Kristen Totonelly
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Prevalence of myopia and its risk factors in rural school children in North India: the North India myopia rural study (NIM-R Study).

Authors:  Rohit Saxena; Vivek Gupta; Priyanka Prasad; Amit Bhardwaj; Praveen Vashist
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 4.456

5.  Association of Visual Impairment With Economic Development Among Chinese Schoolchildren.

Authors:  Catherine Jan; Rongbin Xu; Dongmei Luo; Xiuqin Xiong; Yi Song; Jun Ma; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 6.  IMI - Myopia Genetics Report.

Authors:  Milly S Tedja; Annechien E G Haarman; Magda A Meester-Smoor; Jaakko Kaprio; David A Mackey; Jeremy A Guggenheim; Christopher J Hammond; Virginie J M Verhoeven; Caroline C W Klaver
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  Physical activity, time spent outdoors, and near work in relation to myopia prevalence, incidence, and progression: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Siddharth K Karthikeyan; D L Ashwini; M Priyanka; Anush Nayak; Sayantan Biswas
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.969

8.  Increasing Prevalence of Myopia in Europe and the Impact of Education.

Authors:  Katie M Williams; Geir Bertelsen; Phillippa Cumberland; Christian Wolfram; Virginie J M Verhoeven; Eleftherios Anastasopoulos; Gabriëlle H S Buitendijk; Audrey Cougnard-Grégoire; Catherine Creuzot-Garcher; Maja Gran Erke; Ruth Hogg; René Höhn; Pirro Hysi; Anthony P Khawaja; Jean-François Korobelnik; Janina Ried; Johannes R Vingerling; Alain Bron; Jean-François Dartigues; Astrid Fletcher; Albert Hofman; Robert W A M Kuijpers; Robert N Luben; Konrad Oxele; Fotis Topouzis; Therese von Hanno; Alireza Mirshahi; Paul J Foster; Cornelia M van Duijn; Norbert Pfeiffer; Cécile Delcourt; Caroline C W Klaver; Jugnoo Rahi; Christopher J Hammond
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Prevalence of myopia and its risk factors in urban school children in Delhi: the North India Myopia Study (NIM Study).

Authors:  Rohit Saxena; Praveen Vashist; Radhika Tandon; R M Pandey; Amit Bhardawaj; Vimala Menon; Kalaivani Mani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Role of Educational Exposure in the Association Between Myopia and Birth Order.

Authors:  Jeremy A Guggenheim; Cathy Williams
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.