Literature DB >> 23661231

Causal inference, probability theory, and graphical insights.

Stuart G Baker1.   

Abstract

Causal inference from observational studies is a fundamental topic in biostatistics. The causal graph literature typically views probability theory as insufficient to express causal concepts in observational studies. In contrast, the view here is that probability theory is a desirable and sufficient basis for many topics in causal inference for the following two reasons. First, probability theory is generally more flexible than causal graphs: Besides explaining such causal graph topics as M-bias (adjusting for a collider) and bias amplification and attenuation (when adjusting for instrumental variable), probability theory is also the foundation of the paired availability design for historical controls, which does not fit into a causal graph framework. Second, probability theory is the basis for insightful graphical displays including the BK-Plot for understanding Simpson's paradox with a binary confounder, the BK2-Plot for understanding bias amplification and attenuation in the presence of an unobserved binary confounder, and the PAD-Plot for understanding the principal stratification component of the paired availability design. Published 2013. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BK-Plot; Simpson's paradox; causal graph; confounder; instrumental variable; observational study

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23661231      PMCID: PMC4072761          DOI: 10.1002/sim.5828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  22 in total

1.  Principal stratification in causal inference.

Authors:  Constantine E Frangakis; Donald B Rubin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Invited commentary: understanding bias amplification.

Authors:  Judea Pearl
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Effects of adjusting for instrumental variables on bias and precision of effect estimates.

Authors:  Jessica A Myers; Jeremy A Rassen; Joshua J Gagne; Krista F Huybrechts; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Kenneth J Rothman; Marshall M Joffe; Robert J Glynn
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Remarks on the method of propensity score.

Authors:  Judea Pearl
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  On physicalism and downward causation in developmental and cancer biology.

Authors:  A M Soto; C Sonnenschein; P A Miquel
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 1.774

6.  Surrogate endpoint analysis: an exercise in extrapolation.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Implications of M bias in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.

Authors:  Wei Liu; M Alan Brookhart; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Xiaojuan Mi; Soko Setoguchi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Good for women, good for men, bad for people: Simpson's paradox and the importance of sex-specific analysis in observational studies.

Authors:  S G Baker; B S Kramer
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2001-11

9.  The paired availability design: a proposal for evaluating epidural analgesia during labor.

Authors:  S G Baker; K S Lindeman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-11-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  The role of causal reasoning in understanding Simpson's paradox, Lord's paradox, and the suppression effect: covariate selection in the analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Onyebuchi A Arah
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-26
View more
  3 in total

1.  Additional thoughts on causal inference, probability theory, and graphical insights.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Principal stratification: All-or-none versus partial compliance.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Latent class instrumental variables: a clinical and biostatistical perspective.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Barnett S Kramer; Karen S Lindeman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.373

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.