Literature DB >> 23660412

Adolescent Purchasing Behavior at McDonald's and Subway.

Lenard I Lesser1, Karen C Kayekjian, Paz Velasquez, Chi-Hong Tseng, Robert H Brook, Deborah A Cohen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether adolescents purchasing food at a restaurant marketed as "healthy" (Subway) purchase fewer calories than at a competing chain (McDonald's).
METHODS: We studied 97 adolescents who purchased a meal at both restaurants on different days, using each participant as his or her control. We compared the difference in calories purchased by adolescents at McDonald's and Subway in a diverse area of Los Angeles, CA.
RESULTS: Adolescents purchased an average of 1,038 calories (standard error of the mean [SEM]: 41) at McDonald's and 955 calories (SEM 39) at Subway. The difference of 83 calories (95% confidence interval [CI]: -20 to 186) was not statistically significant (p = .11). At McDonald's, participants purchased significantly more calories from drinks (151 vs. 61, p < .01) and from side dishes (i.e., French fries or potato chips; 201 at McDonald's vs. 35 at Subway, p < .01). In contrast, they purchased fewer cups of vegetables at McDonald's (.15 vs. .57 cups, p < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: We found that, despite being marketed as "healthy," adolescents purchasing a meal at Subway order just as many calories as at McDonald's. Although Subway meals had more vegetables, meals from both restaurants are likely to contribute to overeating.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; Fast food; Obesity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23660412     DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  5 in total

1.  The association of fast food consumption with poor dietary outcomes and obesity among children: is it the fast food or the remainder of the diet?

Authors:  Jennifer M Poti; Kiyah J Duffey; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Active school transport and fast food intake: Are there racial and ethnic differences?

Authors:  E V Sanchez-Vaznaugh; L Bécares; J F Sallis; B N Sánchez
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Assessment of a University Campus Food Environment, California, 2015.

Authors:  Marilyn Tseng; Kelsey DeGreef; Madison Fishler; Rachel Gipson; Kelly Koyano; Dawn B Neill
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  A cross sectional study investigating the association between exposure to food outlets and childhood obesity in Leeds, UK.

Authors:  Claire Griffiths; Anna Frearson; Adam Taylor; Duncan Radley; Carlton Cooke
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Exploring factors affecting individual GPS-based activity space and how researcher-defined food environments represent activity space, exposure and use of food outlets.

Authors:  Windi Lameck Marwa; Duncan Radley; Samantha Davis; James McKenna; Claire Griffiths
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.918

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.