Literature DB >> 23660037

The use of a quality indicator to reduce elective repeat Caesarean section for low-risk women before 39 weeks' gestation: the Eastern Ontario experience.

Sandra Dunn1, Ann E Sprague2, Deshayne B Fell3, Jessica Dy4, JoAnn Harrold5, Bernard Lamontagne6, Mark Walker7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Elective repeat Caesarean section (ERCS) for low-risk women at < 39 weeks' gestation has consistently been associated with increased risks to the neonate, including respiratory morbidity, NICU admission, and lengthier hospital stays than ERCS at 39 to 40 weeks' gestation. The objective of this quality improvement project was to reduce high rates of ERCS < 39 weeks across the Eastern Ontario region.
METHODS: All hospitals within the region providing care during labour and birth (n = 10) were asked to participate. Representatives from each hospital received information about their site-specific rates and knowledge-translation resources to assist them with the project. A benchmark rate for ERCS < 39 weeks was set at 30%. The rates of ERCS < 39 weeks were calculated for two different times (the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 fiscal years) and the relative difference and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to quantify the magnitude and statistical significance of any change. Qualitative interviews were completed with key informants from each hospital.
RESULTS: The proportion of ERCS at < 39 weeks' gestation across the region in the fiscal year 2010-2011 (n = 197/497; 39.6%) was significantly decreased (relative difference: -21%; 95% CI -31% to -8%, P = 0.002) from the previous fiscal year 2009-2010 (n = 229/459; 49.9%). A number of barriers to, and facilitators of, practice change were identified.
CONCLUSION: A reduction in the rate of ERCS < 39 weeks among low-risk women was achieved across the region. Awareness of the issue, possession of site-specific data, and agreement about the evidence and the need for change are critical first steps to improving practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean section; Quality assurance; audit and feedback; knowledge translation; perinatal data

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23660037     DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30957-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  10 in total

Review 1.  Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.

Authors:  Innie Chen; Newton Opiyo; Emma Tavender; Sameh Mortazhejri; Tamara Rader; Jennifer Petkovic; Sharlini Yogasingam; Monica Taljaard; Sugandha Agarwal; Malinee Laopaiboon; Jason Wasiak; Suthit Khunpradit; Pisake Lumbiganon; Russell L Gruen; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-28

2.  Increased planned delivery contributes to declining rates of pregnancy hypertension in Australia: a population-based record linkage study.

Authors:  Christine L Roberts; Charles S Algert; Jonathan M Morris; Jane B Ford
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Applicability of care quality indicators for women with low-risk pregnancies planning hospital birth: a retrospective study of medical records.

Authors:  Kayo Ueda; Toshiyuki Sado; Yoshimitsu Takahashi; Toshiko Igarashi; Takeo Nakayama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Obstetrical safety indicators for preventing hospital harms in low risk births: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Aislinn Conway; Jessica Reszel; Mark C Walker; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Sandra I Dunn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Interventions targeted at health professionals to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Carol Kingdon; Soo Downe; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Use of a maternal newborn audit and feedback system in Ontario: a collective case study.

Authors:  Jessica Reszel; Sandra I Dunn; Ann E Sprague; Ian D Graham; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Wendy E Peterson; Holly Ockenden; Jodi Wilding; Ashley Quosdorf; Elizabeth K Darling; Deshayne B Fell; JoAnn Harrold; Andrea Lanes; Graeme N Smith; Monica Taljaard; Deborah Weiss; Mark C Walker
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  A mixed methods evaluation of the maternal-newborn dashboard in Ontario: dashboard attributes, contextual factors, and facilitators and barriers to use: a study protocol.

Authors:  Sandra Dunn; Ann E Sprague; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Ian D Graham; Monica Taljaard; Deshayne Fell; Wendy E Peterson; Elizabeth Darling; JoAnn Harrold; Graeme N Smith; Jessica Reszel; Andrea Lanes; Carolyn Truskoski; Jodi Wilding; Deborah Weiss; Mark Walker
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section targeted at organisations, facilities and systems: Systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Carol Kingdon; Soo Downe; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Data accuracy in the Ontario birth Registry: a chart re-abstraction study.

Authors:  Sandra Dunn; Andrea Lanes; Ann E Sprague; Deshayne B Fell; Deborah Weiss; Jessica Reszel; Monica Taljaard; Elizabeth K Darling; Ian D Graham; Jeremy M Grimshaw; JoAnn Harrold; Graeme N Smith; Wendy Peterson; Mark Walker
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Association of maternal socioeconomic status and race with risk of congenital heart disease: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Qun Miao; Sandra Dunn; Shi Wu Wen; Jane Lougheed; Cynthia Maxwell; Jessica Reszel; Kaamel Hafizi; Mark Walker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.