| Literature DB >> 23658790 |
Erin K Nichols1, Leisel E Talley, Nelly Birungi, Amanda McClelland, Elizabeth Madraa, Agnes B Chandia, Jacqueline Nivet, Rafael Flores-Ayala, Mary K Serdula.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2009, a humanitarian response was launched to address a food security and livelihoods crisis in Karamoja, Uganda. During a polio immunization campaign in mid-August 2009, health workers in Nakapiripit District reported a concern about an increase in mouth sores, or angular stomatitis (AS) and gum ulcerations, among children in one village, and an investigation was launched.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23658790 PMCID: PMC3642060 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062976
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Map of the Karamoja Region and Districts, Uganda.
Demographics of angular stomatitis cases detected during mass screenings in Nakapiripirit District – Uganda, September – November, 2009.
| Demographic | Number of Cases | Percentage of Cases |
| TOTAL | 399 | 100.0% |
| Age (years) | ||
| 0 to 9 | 198 | 49.6% |
| 10 to 19 | 67 | 17.0% |
| 20+ | 134 | 33.4% |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 201 | 50.4% |
| Female | 198 | 49.6% |
Nutritional content of ration calculated on a planned 30 day cycle, Kotido District (neighboring Nakapiripirit District), Karamoja, Uganda, April – December 2009, NutVal 2006 V 2·2.
| COMMODITY | RATION | ENERGY | PROTEIN | FAT | IRON | IODINE | VIT A | VIT B1 | VIT B2 | VIT B3 | ||||||||
| g/person/day | Kcal | g | g | mg | µg | µg RE | mg | mg | mg NE | |||||||||
| Maize grain, white | 300 | 1,050 | 30.0 | 12.0 | 8.1 | 0 | 0 | 1.16 | 0.60 | 6.6 | ||||||||
| Beans, dried | 50 | 168 | 10.0 | 0.6 | 4.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 0.11 | 3.1 | ||||||||
| Oil, vegetable | 15 | 133 | 0.0 | 15.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 135 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.0 | ||||||||
| Corn soy blend | 30 | 120 | 5.4 | 1.8 | 3.8 | 0 | 150 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 3.0 | ||||||||
| Salt, iodised | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 300 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.0 | ||||||||
| Ration Total | 400 | 1,470 | 45.4 | 29.4 | 16.1 | 300 | 285 | 1.54 | 0.92 | 12.7 | ||||||||
| Requirements | – | 2,100 | 52.5 | 40.0 | 22.0 | 150 | 500 | 0.90 | 1·40 | 13.9 | ||||||||
| % of requirements supplied by ration | 70% | 86% | 74% | 73% | 200% | 57% | 171% | 66% | 92% | |||||||||
| % of energy supplied by protein or fat | – | 12.4% | 18.0% | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||
Note: NE = niacin equivalents, RE = retinol equivalents, VIT = vitamin.
WFP Specifications.
Number and mean duration of distributions and mean energy (Kcal) and riboflavin content of actual ration distributed across 18 locations in Kotido District, Karamoja, Uganda – April-December 2009.
| Location | # of Distributions | Mean Duration ofDistributions, days (Range) | Mean Kcal perDistribution (Range) | Mean Riboflavin Content,mg (Range) |
| A | 5 | 49.7 | 1,133.9 | 0.85 |
| (28–74) | (596–1,575) | (0.62–1.6) | ||
| B | 5 | 69.0 | 1,040.2 | 0.65 |
| (68–88) | (500–1,451) | (0.37–0.99) | ||
| C | 5 | 41.0 | 1,276.5 | 0.80 |
| (40–95) | (464–1,451) | (0.29–0.99) | ||
| D | 5 | 65.5 | 1,166.1 | 0.73 |
| (49–81) | (534–1,451) | (0.34–0.91) | ||
| E | 5 | 55.0 | 1,222.7 | 0.76 |
| (42–68) | (645–1,451) | (0.4–0.91) | ||
| F | 5 | 66.5 | 1,099.2 | 0.69 |
| (38–74) | (596–1,451) | (0.37–0.91) | ||
| G | 5 | 53.0 | 1,141.5 | 0.72 |
| (46–68) | (649–1,451) | (0.41–0.91) | ||
| H | 5 | 46.0 | 1,204.6 | 0.75 |
| (39–85) | (519–1,451) | (0.33–0.91) | ||
| I | 5 | 63.0 | 1,175.6 | 0.74 |
| (37–77) | (573–1,451) | (0.36–0.91) | ||
| J | 5 | 54.0 | 1,048.2 | 0.65 |
| (17–122) | (362–2,594) | (0.23–1.63) | ||
| K | 5 | 65.0 | 1,157.1 | 0.73 |
| (39–79) | (558–1,451) | (0.35–0.91) | ||
| L | 5 | 64.5 | 1,126.6 | 0.71 |
| (39–74) | (596–1,451) | (0.37–0.91) | ||
| M | 5 | 54.0 | 1,485.9 | 1.1 |
| (29–79) | (558–1,521) | (0.35–0.95) | ||
| N | 5 | 45.0 | 1,565.6 | 0.98 |
| (27–64) | (689–1,680) | (0.43–1.06) | ||
| O | 5 | 65.0 | 1,450.7 | 0.91 |
| (46–79) | (558–1,451) | (0.35–0.91) | ||
| P | 5 | 63.0 | 1,175.6 | 0.74 |
| (37–77) | (572–1,451) | (0.36–0.91) | ||
| Q | 5 | 70.0 | 1,149.6 | 0.72 |
| (46–88) | (501–1,451) | (0.31–0.91) | ||
| R | 4 | 64.0 | 1,157.6 | 0.73 |
| (36–77) | (573–1,451) | (0.36–0.91) |
Some locations increased the number of distribution sites per location; these were counted as one distribution as they covered the same population.