Literature DB >> 23658571

Effect of brief training on reliability and applicability of Global Assessment of functioning scale by Psychiatric clinical officers in Uganda.

C Abbo1, E S Okello, J Nakku.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is the standard method and an essential tool for representing a clinician's judgment of a patient's overall level of psychological, social and occupational functioning. As such, it is probably the single most widely used method for assessing impairment among the patients with psychiatric illnesses.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of one-hour training on application of the GAF by Psychiatric Clinical Officers' in a Ugandan setting.
METHOD: Five Psychiatrists and five Psychiatric Clinical Officers (PCOs) or Assistant Medical Officers who hold a 2 year diploma in Clinical Psychiatry were randomly selected to independently rate a video-recorded psychiatric interview according to the DSM IV-TR. The PCOs were then offered a one-hour training on how to rate the GAF scale and asked to rate the video case interview again. All ratings were assigned on the basis of past one year, at admission and current functioning. Interclass correlations (ICC) were computed using two-way mixed models.
RESULTS: The ICC between the psychiatrists and the PCOs before training in the past one year, at admission and current functioning were +0.48, +0.51 and +0.59 respectively. After training, the ICC coefficients were +0.60, +0.82 and +0.83.
CONCLUSION: Brief training given to PCOs improved the applications of their ratings of GAF scale to acceptable levels. There is need for formal training to this cadre of psychiatric practitioners in the use of the GAF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23658571      PMCID: PMC3645100          DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v13i1.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr Health Sci        ISSN: 1680-6905            Impact factor:   0.927


  8 in total

Review 1.  Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning.

Authors:  H H Goldman; A E Skodol; T R Lave
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  Integration of mental health into primary health care in Uganda: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Fred N Kigozi; Joshua Ssebunnya
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2009-03

3.  Are GAF scores reliable in routine clinical use?

Authors:  T Vatnaland; J Vatnaland; S Friis; S Opjordsmoen
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.392

4.  Reliability of global assessment of functioning ratings made by clinical psychiatric staff.

Authors:  Per Söderberg; Stefan Tungström; Bengt Ake Armelius
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  A brief mental health outcome scale-reliability and validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF).

Authors:  S H Jones; G Thornicroft; M Coffey; G Dunn
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  Reliability and validity of DSM-IV axis V.

Authors:  M J Hilsenroth; S J Ackerman; M D Blagys; B D Baumann; M R Baity; S R Smith; J L Price; C L Smith; T L Heindselman; M K Mount; D J Holdwick
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Effects of brief training on application of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale.

Authors:  Larry W Bates; Judith A Lyons; J Bryant Shaw
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2002-12

8.  Global assessment of functioning. A modified scale.

Authors:  R C Hall
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.386

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.