Literature DB >> 17355524

Are GAF scores reliable in routine clinical use?

T Vatnaland1, J Vatnaland, S Friis, S Opjordsmoen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale has been considered as a reliable tool. However, most studies of GAF reliability have been based on special conditions, such as prior training and test awareness. This study takes a different approach investigating inter-rater reliability of GAF scores in a routine clinical context.
METHOD: Eighty-two consecutively admitted acute psychiatric patients were rated according to routine department procedures and by two researchers at admission and discharge. Intraclass correlations (ICC) were computed using two-way mixed models.
RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability between routine scores and research scores were low (ICC coefficients between r = 0.39 and 0.59). Inter-rater reliability between the two researchers were excellent (ICC coefficients r = 0.81 and 0.85).
CONCLUSION: Inter-rater reliability of GAF scores in a routine clinical context seems to be insufficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17355524     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00925.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand        ISSN: 0001-690X            Impact factor:   6.392


  36 in total

1.  Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF): properties and frontier of current knowledge.

Authors:  I H Monrad Aas
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Comparative efficacy and durability of continuation phase cognitive therapy for preventing recurrent depression: design of a double-blinded, fluoxetine- and pill placebo-controlled, randomized trial with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Robin B Jarrett; Michael E Thase
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Extreme nonresponse to acute phase cognitive therapy for depression: an attempt to replicate and extend.

Authors:  Aaron M Koenig; Robin B Jarrett; Robert Gallop; Marna S Barrett; Michael E Thase
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2013-12-23

4.  Effect of brief training on reliability and applicability of Global Assessment of functioning scale by Psychiatric clinical officers in Uganda.

Authors:  C Abbo; E S Okello; J Nakku
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.927

5.  Beyond the global assessment of functioning: learning from Virginia Apgar.

Authors:  Joel E Dimsdale; Dilip V Jeste; Thomas L Patterson
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.386

6.  Psychometric Properties of the Milestones of Recovery Scale-Older Adult Version.

Authors:  Kristen L Hess; Dennis G Fisher; David Pilon; Grace L Reynolds; Joe Ruiz
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2016-02-11

7.  Preventing Maltreatment with a Community-Based Implementation of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy.

Authors:  Paul Lanier; Patricia L Kohl; Joan Benz; Dawn Swinger; Brett Drake
Journal:  J Child Fam Stud       Date:  2014-02-01

8.  Comorbid mental disorders in substance users from a single catchment area--a clinical study.

Authors:  Anne-Marit Langås; Ulrik F Malt; Stein Opjordsmoen
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  Memory support strategies and bundles: A pathway to improving cognitive therapy for depression?

Authors:  Lu Dong; Jason Y Lee; Allison G Harvey
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2017-03

10.  Development of the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale: concurrent validity, discriminant validity and retest reliability.

Authors:  Jodi M Gonzalez; Charles L Bowden; Martin M Katz; Peter Thompson; Vivek Singh; Thomas J Prihoda; Martha Dahl
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.