Literature DB >> 23658115

An assessment of a modern touch-screen tablet computer with reference to core physical characteristics necessary for clinical vision testing.

Tariq M Aslam1, Ian J Murray, Michael Y T Lai, Emma Linton, Humza J Tahir, Neil R A Parry.   

Abstract

There are a multitude of applications using modern tablet computers for vision testing that are accessible to ophthalmology patients. While these may be of potential future benefit, they are often unsupported by scientific assessment. This report investigates the pertinent physical characteristics behind one of the most common highest specification tablet computers with regard to its capacity for vision testing. We demonstrate through plotting of a gamma curve that it is feasible to produce a precise programmable range of central luminance levels on the device, even with varying background luminance levels. It may not be possible to display very low levels of contrast, but carefully using the gamma curve information allows a reasonable range of contrast sensitivity to be tested. When the screen is first powered on, it may require up to 15 min for the luminance values to stabilize. Finally, luminance of objects varies towards the edge of the screen and when viewed at an angle. However, the resulting effective contrast of objects is less variable. Details of our assessments are important to developers, users and prescribers of tablet clinical vision tests. Without awareness of such findings, these tests may never reach satisfactory levels of clinical validity and reliability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  iPad; tablet computer; vision testing; visual function

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23658115      PMCID: PMC3673161          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  4 in total

1.  The performance of general-purpose colour CRT monitors in PACS environment.

Authors:  H Kondoh; K Hatazawa; T Kozuka
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Normal values for the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test.

Authors:  M Mäntyjärvi; T Laitinen
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 3.  How big is the burden of visual loss caused by age related macular degeneration in the United Kingdom?

Authors:  C G Owen; A E Fletcher; M Donoghue; A R Rudnicka
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Visual impairment and quality of life in the older European population, the EUREYE study.

Authors:  Johan H Seland; Johannes R Vingerling; Cristina A Augood; Graham Bentham; Usha Chakravarthy; Paulus T V M deJong; Mati Rahu; Gisele Soubrane; Laura Tomazzoli; Fotis Topouzis; Astrid E Fletcher
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 3.761

  4 in total
  14 in total

1.  Development and testing of an automated computer tablet-based method for self-testing of high and low contrast near visual acuity in ophthalmic patients.

Authors:  Tariq M Aslam; Neil R A Parry; Ian J Murray; Mahani Salleh; Caterina Dal Col; Naznin Mirza; Gabriela Czanner; Humza J Tahir
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Age norms for grating acuity and contrast sensitivity in children using eye tracking technology.

Authors:  E Esteban-Ibañez; T Pérez-Roche; E Prieto; O Castillo; A Fanlo-Zarazaga; A Alejandre; D Gutierrez; M Ortin; V Pueyo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  mHealth Clinic Appointment PC Tablet: Implementation, Challenges and Solutions.

Authors:  Carol E Smith; Ryan Spaulding; Ubolrat Piamjariyakul; Marilyn Werkowitch; Donna Macan Yadrich; Dedrick Hooper; Tyson Moore; Richard Gilroy
Journal:  J Mob Technol Med       Date:  2015-07-16

4.  Testing Pediatric Acuity With an iPad: Validation of "Peekaboo Vision" in Malawi and the UK.

Authors:  Iain Livingstone; Laura Butler; Esther Misanjo; Alan Lok; Duncan Middleton; Janice Waterson Wilson; Silvija Delfin; Petros Kayange; Ruth Hamilton
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Measurement of Retinal Sensitivity on Tablet Devices in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Zhichao Wu; Robyn H Guymer; Chang J Jung; Jonathan K Goh; Lauren N Ayton; Chi D Luu; David J Lawson; Andrew Turpin; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Optimisation and assessment of three modern touch screen tablet computers for clinical vision testing.

Authors:  Humza J Tahir; Ian J Murray; Neil R A Parry; Tariq M Aslam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Comparison of Perimetric Results from a Tablet Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients.

Authors:  Yu Xiang George Kong; Mingguang He; Jonathan G Crowston; Algis J Vingrys
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Validation of a Tablet as a Tangent Perimeter.

Authors:  Algis J Vingrys; Jessica K Healey; Sheryl Liew; Veera Saharinen; Michael Tran; William Wu; George Y X Kong
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices.

Authors:  I A T Livingstone; C M Tarbert; M E Giardini; A Bastawrous; D Middleton; R Hamilton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Accuracy and Feasibility of an Android-Based Digital Assessment Tool for Post Stroke Visual Disorders-The StrokeVision App.

Authors:  Terence J Quinn; Iain Livingstone; Alexander Weir; Robert Shaw; Andrew Breckenridge; Christine McAlpine; Claire M Tarbert
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.