PURPOSE:Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but its impact on ciliary function is unclear to date. Furthermore, CPAP is associated with numerous side effects related to the nose and upper airway. Humidified CPAP is used to relieve these symptoms, but again, little is known regarding its effect on ciliary function of the nasal respiratory epithelium. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, crossover trial, 31 patients with OSA (AHI >15/h) were randomized to two treatment arms: nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) with humidification or nCPAP without humidification for one night in each modality to assess short-term effects of ciliary beat frequency (CBF) and mucus transport time (MTT) and consecutively for 8 weeks in each modality to assess long-term effects in a crossover fashion. RESULTS: The baseline CBF was 4.8 ± 0.6 Hz, and baseline MTT was 540 ± 221 s. After one night of CPAP with and without humidification, ciliary function increased moderately yet with statistical significance (p <0.05). The short-term groups with and without humidification did not differ statistically significant. Regarding long-term effects of CPAP, a statistically significant increase in ciliary function above the baseline level and above the short-term level was shown without humidification (7.2 ± 0.4 Hz; 402 ± 176 s; p <0.01). The increase above baseline level was even more pronounced with humidification (9.3 ± 0.7 Hz; 313 ± 95 s; p <0.01). There was a statistically significant difference between both groups at long-term assessment with regard to CBF (p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Independent of airway humidification, nCPAP has moderate effects on short-term ciliary function of the nasal respiratory epithelium. However, a significant increase in ciliary function-both in terms of an increased CBF and a decreased MTT-was detected after long-term use. The effect was more pronounced when humidification was used during nCPAP.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but its impact on ciliary function is unclear to date. Furthermore, CPAP is associated with numerous side effects related to the nose and upper airway. Humidified CPAP is used to relieve these symptoms, but again, little is known regarding its effect on ciliary function of the nasal respiratory epithelium. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, crossover trial, 31 patients with OSA (AHI >15/h) were randomized to two treatment arms: nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) with humidification or nCPAP without humidification for one night in each modality to assess short-term effects of ciliary beat frequency (CBF) and mucus transport time (MTT) and consecutively for 8 weeks in each modality to assess long-term effects in a crossover fashion. RESULTS: The baseline CBF was 4.8 ± 0.6 Hz, and baseline MTT was 540 ± 221 s. After one night of CPAP with and without humidification, ciliary function increased moderately yet with statistical significance (p <0.05). The short-term groups with and without humidification did not differ statistically significant. Regarding long-term effects of CPAP, a statistically significant increase in ciliary function above the baseline level and above the short-term level was shown without humidification (7.2 ± 0.4 Hz; 402 ± 176 s; p <0.01). The increase above baseline level was even more pronounced with humidification (9.3 ± 0.7 Hz; 313 ± 95 s; p <0.01). There was a statistically significant difference between both groups at long-term assessment with regard to CBF (p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Independent of airway humidification, nCPAP has moderate effects on short-term ciliary function of the nasal respiratory epithelium. However, a significant increase in ciliary function-both in terms of an increased CBF and a decreased MTT-was detected after long-term use. The effect was more pronounced when humidification was used during nCPAP.
Authors: Luciana R de Oliveira; Claudia S Albertini Yagi; Adelaide C Figueiredo; Paulo H N Saldiva; Geraldo Lorenzi-Filho Journal: Respir Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: Susheel P Patil; Indu A Ayappa; Sean M Caples; R Joh Kimoff; Sanjay R Patel; Christopher G Harrod Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Bjorg Eysteinsdottir; Thorarinn Gislason; Allan I Pack; Bryndís Benediktsdottir; Erna S Arnardottir; Samuel T Kuna; Erla Björnsdottir Journal: J Sleep Res Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 3.981
Authors: Richard Birk; C Aderhold; J Stern-Sträter; K Hörmann; B A Stuck; J U Sommer Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2014-06-06 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: R Birk; C Aderhold; A Wenzel; T Eschenhagen; B Kramer; K Hörmann; B A Stuck; J U Sommer Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 2.503