| Literature DB >> 23657005 |
Makoto Sasaki1, Naotaka Ogasawara, Yasushi Funaki, Mari Mizuno, Akihito Iida, Chiho Goto, Satoshi Koikeda, Kunio Kasugai, Takashi Joh.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently, the relationship between gut microbiota and obesity has been highlighted. The present randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of transglucosidase (TGD) in modulating blood glucose levels and body weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and to clarify the underlying mechanism by analyzing the gut microbiota of T2DM patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23657005 PMCID: PMC3658914 DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-81
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Figure 1Flow diagram of patients included.
Patients’ characteristics and nutrient intake profiles
| Characteristic | ||||
| Sex (male/female) | 9/11 | 14/6 | 12/8 | 0.272 |
| Age (year) | 61.8 ± 8.1 | 62.4 ± 10.3 | 62.7 ± 8.3 | 0.928 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.8 ± 4.2 | 25.1 ± 4.8 | 23.2 ± 3.1 | 0.187 |
| HbA1c (%) | 6.9 ± 0.7 | 6.7 ± 0.5 | 6.7 ± 0.4 | 0.319 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) | 141.4 ± 35.3 | 143.8 ± 20.1 | 148.8 ± 23.7 | 0.677 |
| Insulin (mU/mL) | 9.2 ± 8.1 | 13.7 ± 17.5 | 13.2 ± 21.9 | 0.651 |
| Nutrients | ||||
| Energy (Kcal) | 1565 ± 320 | 1768 ± 417 | 1671 ± 321 | 0.203 |
| Protein (g) | 51.3 ± 11.1 | 56.9 ± 11.7 | 52.7 ± 8.4 | 0.203 |
| Fat (g) | 39.8 ± 7.3 | 45.0 ± 10.3 | 39.3 ± 8.2 | 0.069 |
| Cholesterol (mg) | 254 ± 80 | 234 ± 53 | 235 ± 64 | 0.548 |
| Ongoing diabetes therapies, n (%) | ||||
| Insulin injection | 3 (15) | 2 (10) | 6 (30) | 0.235 |
| Metoformin | 5 (25) | 7 (35) | 5 (25) | 0.720 |
| Insulin secretagogue | 13 (65) | 12 (60) | 9 (45) | 0.414 |
| α-Glicosidase inhibitor | 8 (40) | 10 (50) | 10 (50) | 0.765 |
| PPAR-γ antagonist | 5 (25) | 5 (25) | 5 (25) | 1.000 |
| ≥2 diabetes drugs | 11 (55) | 11 (55) | 9 (45) | 0.766 |
| Lifestyle modification only | 2 (4) | 1 (5) | 2 (4) | 0.804 |
TGD, transglucosidase; HbA1c, glycolated hemoglobin.
Figure 2The HbA1c levels and BMIs before and after the treatment. Open circle, placebo; open square, TGD300; open triangle, TGD900.
Figure 3Gut microbes in the healthy individuals and T2DM patients. Significant decreases in Clostridium cluster IV and Clostridium subcluster XIVa components were observed in the T2DM patients compared with the healthy individuals. In contrast, the Lactobacillales and Bifidobacterium populations significantly increased in the T2DM patients.
Figure 4Dendrogram of the fecal bacteria structure in the T2DM patients and healthy individuals. T-RFLP patterns by BslI digestions were analyzed using the software GeneMaths (Applied Maths, Belgium), and the Pearson similarity coefficient analysis and unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic means were used to establish the type of dendrogram. Open triangle, healthy volunteers; open square, T2DM patients before the placebo treatment; closed square, T2DM patients after the placebo treatment; open circle, T2DM patients before the treatment; closed circle, T2DM patients after the treatment.
Figure 5Bacteroidete-to-Firmicutes ratio before and after the TGD treatment in the T2DM patients. After the TGD therapy, the Bacteroidetes-to-Firmicutes ratio in both TGD groups significantly increased compared with that before the TGD treatment and was also significantly higher than that in the placebo group.