| Literature DB >> 23656972 |
Guy Hidas1, Dov Pode, Amos Shapiro, Ran Katz, Liat Appelbaum, Galina Pizov, Kevin C Zorn, Ezekiel H Landau, Mordechai Duvdevani, Ofer N Gofrit.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The management of patients with high-grade non muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) brings diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. In the current study, we sought to study the natural history of progression to "secondary" muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC)-cancer that developed during follow up of patients presenting with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23656972 PMCID: PMC3655874 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-13-23
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Urol ISSN: 1471-2490 Impact factor: 2.264
Demographic details of patients with primary and secondary muscle-invasive bladder cancer
| Number | 104 | 40 | |
| Mean Age years (S.D.) | 72.7 (11.0) | 69. 3 (11.3) | 0.08 |
| Sex (%) | | | |
| Male | 79 (75.9) | 33 (82.5) | 0.5 |
| Female | 25 (24.1) | 7 (17.5) | |
| Number of Patients who underwent Cystectomy (%) | 64 (61.5%) | 23 (57.5%) | 0.13 |
| Mean Follow-up in months (range) | 40.1 (2–150) | 52.6 (5–150) | 0.08 |
Final pathological staging of patients with primary and secondary muscle-invasive bladder cancer who underwent cystectomy
| pT0 | 5 (7.8%) | 4 (17.4%) |
| pT1 | 4 (6.2%) | 1 (4.3%) |
| pT2 | 25 (39%) | 4 (17.4%) |
| pT3 | 30 (46.9%) | 11 (47.8%) |
| pT4 | 0 | 3 (13%) |
| N0 | 51 (79.7%) | 21 (91.3%) |
| N+ | 13 (20.3%) | 2 (8.7%) |
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing the disease specific survival of patients with primary and secondary T2 bladder cancer. The numbers represent the numbers of patients at risk. A- Disease specific survival is calculated from the day of bladder cancer. B- Disease specific survival is calculated from the day of progression to T2 bladder cancer.