Literature DB >> 23654206

Positive display polarity is advantageous for both younger and older adults.

Cosima Piepenbrock1, Susanne Mayr, Iris Mund, Axel Buchner.   

Abstract

The effect of display polarity on visual acuity and proofreading performance was investigated for younger and older adults. An advantage of positive polarity (dark characters on light background) over negative polarity (light characters on dark background) was expected for younger adults, but the effects on older adults were ambiguous. Light scatter due to residues in the senescent lens and vitreous humour could reverse the typical advantage of positive polarity. However, age-related changes lead to a decline in retinal illuminance. Brighter positive polarity displays should help to compensate for this decline and, accordingly, lead to better performance than darker negative polarity displays. Participants conducted a visual acuity test with black optotypes on white background or white optotypes on black background and performed a proofreading task in the same polarity. A positive polarity advantage was found for both age groups. The presentation in positive polarity is recommended for all ages. PRACTITIONER
SUMMARY: In an ageing society, age-related vision changes need to be considered when designing digital displays. Visual acuity testing and a proofreading task revealed a positive polarity advantage for younger and older adults. Dark characters on light background lead to better legibility and are strongly recommended independent of observer's age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23654206     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2013.790485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Impact of Color and Polarity on Visual Resolution with Varying Contrast Ratios and Different Text Backgrounds.

Authors:  Ai-Hong Chen; Nurulain Muhamad
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2022-04-29

2.  Learning Experience Design in Health Professions Education: A Conceptual Review of Evidence for Educators.

Authors:  Joann Pan; Jessica Sheu; Lauren Massimo; Kevin R Scott; Andrew W Phillips
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-10-13

3.  Mobile App Delivery of the EORTC QLQ-C30 Questionnaire to Assess Health-Related Quality of Life in Oncological Patients: Usability Study.

Authors:  Kerstin A Kessel; Marco Me Vogel; Anna Alles; Sophie Dobiasch; Hanna Fischer; Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.773

4.  Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response.

Authors:  Paula Bernal-Molina; José J Esteve-Taboada; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2018-04-04

5.  Age-related differences in the legibility of degraded text.

Authors:  Benjamin Wolfe; Jonathan Dobres; Anna Kosovicheva; Ruth Rosenholtz; Bryan Reimer
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-12-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.