Literature DB >> 23653820

Impact of online learning modules on medical student microbiology examination scores.

Mary T Johnson1.   

Abstract

Medical students have a limited amount of time in which to acquire working knowledge of an enormous amount of information, and this is especially relevant for microbiology. One large midwestern medical school is unique in having medical microbiology taught at nine regional campuses using a single core curriculum. A committee of statewide course directors writes a licensure board-style final examination that is referenced to the core and used at all campuses. To prepare for the final examination, students traditionally utilize print-based board examination review books. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether students who train using web-based quizzes score differently as a group on this statewide examination than students who do not utilize the materials online for exam preparation. The study included 71 learners from two different campuses who were taught by the same instructor and were admitted to medical school with similar exemplary credentials. Results were aggregated for three consecutive years. A standard medical microbiology textbook was used to assign the same suggested readings for all students and similar laboratory sessions were provided for all learners. The independent variable was use of the web-based quizzes to prepare before examinations, as indicated by student web usage logs. The dependent variable was score on the statewide final examination. Results support the hypothesis that students who use preparation modules online score higher on the final examination than students who do not. Moreover, students who prepared online scored higher on questions designed to test synthesis of knowledge and analysis of data. The significant difference in final examination outcome (P < 0.002 using a two-tailed unpaired t test) indicates that online preparation for high-stakes examinations could improve student performance in medical microbiology.

Year:  2008        PMID: 23653820      PMCID: PMC3577149          DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.v9.91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ        ISSN: 1935-7877


  9 in total

1.  Peer instruction improves performance on quizzes.

Authors:  S P Rao; S E DiCarlo
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Classroom lectures do not influence family practice residents' learning.

Authors:  S Warner; D E Williams; R Lukman; C C Powell; K Kundinger
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  EMCyberSchool: an evaluation of computer-assisted instruction on the Internet.

Authors:  K M Baumlin; M J Bessette; C Lewis; L D Richardson
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Dynamic quiz bank: a portable tool set for authoring and managing distributed, Web-based educational programs in radiology.

Authors:  David J Foran; John L Nosher; Randall Siegel; Michael Schmidling; Jana Raskova
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Creating learner-centered classrooms: use of an audience response system in pediatric dentistry education.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Johnson
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Impact of self-assessment questions and learning styles in Web-based learning: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial.

Authors:  David A Cook; Warren G Thompson; Kris G Thomas; Matthew R Thomas; V Shane Pankratz
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles.

Authors:  Heidi L Lujan; Stephen E DiCarlo
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  An evaluation of computer-based instruction in microbiology.

Authors:  S M Merkel; L B Walman; J S Leventhal
Journal:  Microbiol Educ       Date:  2000-05

9.  Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?

Authors:  D Davis; M A O'Brien; N Freemantle; F M Wolf; P Mazmanian; A Taylor-Vaisey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Impact of general medicine rotation training on the in-training examination scores of 11, 244 Japanese resident physicians: a Nationwide multi-center cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yuji Nishizaki; Taro Shimizu; Tomohiro Shinozaki; Tomoya Okubo; Yu Yamamoto; Ryota Konishi; Yasuharu Tokuda
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.463

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.