Literature DB >> 23653707

Multiple benefits derived from a peer teacher program in two undergraduate microbiology lab courses.

Frances C Sailer1, Roger W Melvold, Charles C Hosford.   

Abstract

A peer teaching program was implemented to alleviate the problem of a limited number of lab instructors attempting to teach large numbers of students in two different undergraduate microbiology lab courses. The benefit of having peer teachers was immediately obvious to the lab instructors, faculty and staff who were responsible for conducting the labs, but it was soon evident that there were also benefits for everyone else involved in the program. The students enrolled in the labs reported that having peer teachers in the lab enhanced their learning, and they felt comfortable receiving help from a peer teacher who had recently completed the course. The peer teachers discovered that they gained valuable experience and confidence while teaching other students, and they appreciated the chance to gain hands-on experience. The lab instructors received the qualified help they needed in order to give more individual attention to the large numbers of students in the labs. The feedback from this program has been positive from everyone involved.

Year:  2010        PMID: 23653707      PMCID: PMC3577185          DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.v11i2.190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ        ISSN: 1935-7877


  8 in total

1.  Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence.

Authors:  Tai M Lockspeiser; Patricia O'Sullivan; Arianne Teherani; Jessica Muller
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 3.853

Review 2.  A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education.

Authors:  Jacinta Secomb
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 3.036

3.  The use of peer leadership to teach fundamental nursing skills.

Authors:  Linda Bensfield; P Ann Solari-Twadell; Sheryl Sommer
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.082

4.  Peer teaching among physical therapy students during human gross anatomy: perceptions of peer teachers and students.

Authors:  James W Youdas; Brianna L Hoffarth; Scott R Kohlwey; Christine M Kramer; Jaime L Petro
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Peer-assisted versus faculty staff-led skills laboratory training: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Peter Weyrich; Nora Celebi; Markus Schrauth; Andreas Möltner; Maria Lammerding-Köppel; Christoph Nikendei
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Student teaching: views of student near-peer teachers and learners.

Authors:  Carolien Bulte; Aaron Betts; Kathryn Garner; Steven Durning
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Near-peer teaching in anatomy: an approach for deeper learning.

Authors:  Darrell J R Evans; Tracy Cuffe
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Helping each other to learn--a process evaluation of peer assisted learning.

Authors:  Liam G Glynn; Anne MacFarlane; Maureen Kelly; Peter Cantillon; Andrew W Murphy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.