Literature DB >> 23652285

Perspectives on resorbable osteosynthesis materials in craniomaxillofacial surgery.

Paul Schumann1, Daniel Lindhorst, Maximilian E H Wagner, Alexander Schramm, Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Martin Rücker.   

Abstract

Since introduction to the clinics in the 1990s, resorbable osteosynthesis systems have undergone extensive improvements in order to establish their use as a standard treatment, especially in craniomaxillofacial surgery. However, the development of osteosynthesis systems made of poly(α-hydroxy acid) polymers has been hindered by the lack of information on the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of these materials. Moreover, magnesium-based degredable osteosynthesis materials have not yet been integrated into clinical practice owing to biocompatibility problems. Osteosynthesis systems made from nonresorbable titanium alloys have shown excellent biocompatibility, stability and individual fitting to the implant bed, so these materials are currently considered the 'gold standard'. The procedure of plate removal has been subjected to intense scrutiny and controversy. Bioresorbable materials are indicated for special conditions, such as osteosynthesis of the growing skull or orbital floor reconstructions. This paper presents an overview of the currently available and investigated resorbable osteosynthesis materials in comparison with the nonresorbable 'gold standard' titanium. The main problem areas such as sterilization, biocompatibility and stability are highlighted and perspectives for further improvements are provided.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23652285     DOI: 10.1159/000348328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathobiology        ISSN: 1015-2008            Impact factor:   4.342


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Reconstructive orbital surgery].

Authors:  M E H Wagner; H Essig; M Rücker; T Gander
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Making Hardware Removal Unnecessary by Using Resorbable Implants for Osteosynthesis in Children.

Authors:  Pascal Heye; Christoph Matissek; Clemens Seidl; Marcell Varga; Tamas Kassai; Gergö Jozsa; Thomas Krebs
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29

3.  Comparison of pre-bent titanium mesh versus polyethylene implants in patient specific orbital reconstructions.

Authors:  Marcin Kozakiewicz; Piotr Szymor
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 4.  Overview of innovative advances in bioresorbable plate systems for oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Takahiro Kanno; Shintaro Sukegawa; Yoshihiko Furuki; Yoshiki Nariai; Joji Sekine
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2018-04-05

5.  Complications of Poly-l-Lactic Acid and Polyglycolic Acid (PLLA/PGA) Osteosynthesis Systems for Maxillofacial Surgery: A Retrospective Clinical Investigation.

Authors:  Yuhei Matsuda; Masaaki Karino; Tatsuo Okui; Takahiro Kanno
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 4.329

6.  Feasibility of Application of the Newly Developed Nano-Biomaterial, β-TCP/PDLLA, in Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery: A Pilot Rat Study.

Authors:  Erina Toda; Yunpeng Bai; Jingjing Sha; Quang Ngoc Dong; Huy Xuan Ngo; Takashi Suyama; Kenichi Miyamoto; Yumi Matsuzaki; Takahiro Kanno
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 7.  A Narrative Review of u-HA/PLLA, a Bioactive Resorbable Reconstruction Material: Applications in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Huy Xuan Ngo; Yunpeng Bai; Jingjing Sha; Shinji Ishizuka; Erina Toda; Rie Osako; Akira Kato; Reon Morioka; Mrunalini Ramanathan; Hiroto Tatsumi; Tatsuo Okui; Takahiro Kanno
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 8.  Biocompatible Materials in Otorhinolaryngology and Their Antibacterial Properties.

Authors:  Jakub Spałek; Przemysław Ociepa; Piotr Deptuła; Ewelina Piktel; Tamara Daniluk; Grzegorz Król; Stanisław Góźdź; Robert Bucki; Sławomir Okła
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Are Biodegradable Osteosyntheses Still an Option for Midface Trauma? Longitudinal Evaluation of Three Different PLA-Based Materials.

Authors:  Andreas Kolk; Robert Köhnke; Christoph H Saely; Oliver Ploder
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction-An Overview.

Authors:  Victor A Vasile; Sinziana Istrate; Raluca C Iancu; Roxana M Piticescu; Laura M Cursaru; Leopold Schmetterer; Gerhard Garhöfer; Alina Popa Cherecheanu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.