Literature DB >> 23652263

Minimum 10-year follow-up of patients after an acute, isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury treated nonoperatively.

K Donald Shelbourne1, Melanie Clark, Tinker Gray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies report long-term subjective or objective results for acute, isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries in patients followed prospectively. HYPOTHESIS: Subjective or objective results will not differ based on PCL laxity. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with an acute, isolated PCL injury were treated nonoperatively and followed prospectively with yearly subjective surveys and periodic objective evaluations. Physical examination included evaluation of range of motion, effusion, and quadriceps strength; radiographic grading of osteoarthritis; and measurements of joint space width. Subjective follow-up included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System (CKRS) surveys.
RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were available for both objective and subjective evaluations at a mean of 14.3 years (range, 10-21 years) after injury. All 68 patients underwent subjective follow-up at a mean of 17.6 years after injury. The mean quadriceps muscle strength was 97% of the noninvolved leg; all patients maintained normal knee range of motion. The overall grade of radiographs was rated as normal in 26 patients (59%), nearly normal in 13 patients (30%), abnormal in 4 patients (9%), and severely abnormal in 1 patient (2%). The grade of osteoarthritis on radiographs was not different in any knee compartment based on PCL laxity grade. Five patients (11%) had medial joint space narrowing greater than 2 mm. Mean IKDC and modified CKRS subjective scores at a mean of 17 years after injury were 73.4 ± 21.7 and 81.3 ± 17.4, respectively; there was no difference in subjective scores between PCL laxity grades. There was no difference in subjective scores between patients who completed a minimum 10-year objective follow-up and patients who completed surveys only.
CONCLUSION: Long-term results after an isolated PCL injury show that patients remain active, have good strength and full knee range of motion, and report good subjective scores. The prevalence of moderate to severe osteoarthritis was 11%. Results were not different based on PCL laxity grade. This natural history study of nonoperatively treated PCL injuries can serve as a baseline for comparison with patients treated with PCL reconstruction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  isolated injury; long-term outcome; natural history; osteoarthritis; posterior cruciate ligament

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23652263     DOI: 10.1177/0363546513486771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  37 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Osteotomy for the Treatment of PCL Injuries.

Authors:  João V Novaretti; Andrew J Sheean; Jayson Lian; Joseph De Groot; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

2.  Biomechanical properties of femoral posterior cruciate ligament fixations.

Authors:  M Ettinger; M Petri; K T Haag; S Brand; A Dratzidis; C Hurschler; C Krettek; M Jagodzinski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Prospective analysis using a patient-based health-related scale shows lower functional scores after posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions as compared with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions of the knee.

Authors:  Satoshi Ochiai; Tetsuo Hagino; Shinya Senga; Takashi Yamashita; Takashi Ando; Hirotaka Haro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Posterior cruciate ligament is twisted and flat structure: new prospective on anatomical morphology.

Authors:  Tomohiro Kato; Robert Śmigielski; Yunshen Ge; Urszula Zdanowicz; Bogdan Ciszek; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Incidence and long-term follow-up of isolated posterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  Thomas L Sanders; Ayoosh Pareek; Ian J Barrett; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Andrew J Bryan; Michael J Stuart; Bruce A Levy; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Tibial Inlay Press-fit Fixation Versus Interference Screw in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Max Ettinger; Sarah Büermann; Tilman Calliess; Mohamed Omar; Christian Krettek; Christof Hurschler; Michael Jagodzinski; Maximilian Petri
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2013-11-06

Review 7.  Posterior Cruciate Ligament: Current Concepts Review.

Authors:  Santiago Pache; Zachary S Aman; Mitchell Kennedy; Gilberto Yoshinobu Nakama; Gilbert Moatshe; Connor Ziegler; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-01

Review 8.  Open Tibial Inlay PCL Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Evan E Vellios; Kristofer J Jones; David R McAllister
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

Review 9.  Nonoperative Treatment of PCL Injuries: Goals of Rehabilitation and the Natural History of Conservative Care.

Authors:  Dean Wang; Jessica Graziano; Riley J Williams; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

10.  [Return to sport after surgical treatment of a posterior cruciate ligament injury : A retrospective study of 60 patients].

Authors:  M Ahrend; A Ateschrang; S Döbele; U Stöckle; L Grünwald; S Schröter; C Ihle
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.