| Literature DB >> 23651942 |
Hui Shen1,2, Charleson R Poovaiah3,2, Angela Ziebell4,2, Timothy J Tschaplinski2, Sivakumar Pattathil5,2, Erica Gjersing4,2, Nancy L Engle2, Rui Katahira4,6, Yunqiao Pu4,2, Robert Sykes4,2, Fang Chen1,2, Arthur J Ragauskas7,2, Jonathan R Mielenz2, Michael G Hahn5,2, Mark Davis4,2, C Neal Stewart3,2, Richard A Dixon1,2,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lignocellulosic biomass is one of the most promising renewable and clean energy resources to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and dependence on fossil fuels. However, the resistance to accessibility of sugars embedded in plant cell walls (so-called recalcitrance) is a major barrier to economically viable cellulosic ethanol production. A recent report from the US National Academy of Sciences indicated that, "absent technological breakthroughs", it was unlikely that the US would meet the congressionally mandated renewable fuel standard of 35 billion gallons of ethanol-equivalent biofuels plus 1 billion gallons of biodiesel by 2022. We here describe the properties of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) biomass that has been genetically engineered to increase the cellulosic ethanol yield by more than 2-fold.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23651942 PMCID: PMC3652750 DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-71
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Figure 1Bioconversion of PvMYB4-OX transgenic switchgrass biomass to ethanol with or without hot water pretreatment using D5A. (a, b) Time courses of fermentation of whole plant material without (a) and with (b) hot water pre-treatment in fermentation broths measured by weight loss. (c, d) Final ethanol yields calculated as mg/g cellulose (c) or mg/g biomass (d) from hot water pre-treated and non-treated biomass, with comparison of different control (Ctrl) and PvMYB4-OX lines. (e, f) Correlation between the PvMYB4 transcript level and SSF ethanol yield without pretreatment. Data from lines L1, L6, L7, L8, L9 and L10 (Alamo ST1 background), and 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 2A and 2B) Alamo ST2 genetic background) are used. (g, h) SSF ethanol yield comparison of PvMYB4-OX and PvCOMT-RNAi [9] transgenic lines. All data are means ± SE (n = 3).
Metabolite concentrations (ng/ml; sorbitol equivalents) of methanol extractives by GC-MS
| 16.07 375 583 513 411 427 204 | 6 | 1 | 8.66 | 0.000 | glucoside |
| 16.23 488 327 265 syringyl lignan | 4 | 1 | 6.33 | 0.018 | lignan |
| 15.97 583 375 285 | 70 | 12 | 5.98 | 0.001 | N/A |
| 11.01 450 217 sugar | 45 | 11 | 4.29 | 0.030 | modified sugar |
| 9.96 281 383 354 | 289 | 71 | 4.07 | 0.022 | phenolic |
| 10.27 328 343 284 254 | 999 | 245 | 4.08 | 0.005 | N/A |
| raffinose | 933 | 267 | 3.49 | 0.022 | sugar - trisaccharide |
| galactose | 1193 | 345 | 3.46 | 0.056 | sugar - monosaccharide |
| 19.47 496 481 209 lignan | 36 | 11 | 3.31 | 0.050 | lignan |
| α-tocopherol | 18 | 6 | 3.20 | 0.060 | vitamin |
| γ-tocopherol | 8 | 3 | 2.73 | 0.018 | vitamin |
| 13.93 375 292 305 275 uronic acid | 176 | 69 | 2.54 | 0.002 | sugar acid conjugate |
| dehydroabietic acid | 76 | 32 | 2.36 | 0.048 | resin acid |
| 19.09 483 498 lignan | 11 | 5 | 2.27 | 0.047 | lignan |
| tryptophan | 264 | 120 | 2.21 | 0.036 | amino acid |
| 16.11 368 600 585 353 255 | 11 | 5 | 2.18 | 0.001 | N/A |
| fructose | 8160 | 3897 | 2.09 | 0.083 | sugar - monosaccharide |
| bornesitol | 2914 | 1403 | 2.08 | 0.000 | cyclitol |
| glutamine | 605 | 315 | 1.92 | 0.081 | amino acid |
| tyrosine | 234 | 123 | 1.91 | 0.058 | amino acid |
| α-linolenic acid | 1132 | 674 | 1.68 | 0.060 | fatty acid |
| alanine | 3061 | 1835 | 1.67 | 0.002 | amino acid |
| glucose | 6307 | 3799 | 1.66 | 0.040 | sugar - monosaccharide |
| 16.85 caffeic acid conjugate | 17 | 11 | 1.59 | 0.031 | phenylpropanoid |
| dodecanoic acid | 134 | 88 | 1.53 | 0.090 | fatty acid |
| 3- | 414 | 297 | 1.39 | 0.146 | phenylpropanoid |
| 5- | 24 | 17 | 1.37 | 0.073 | phenylpropanoid |
| caffeic acid | 42 | 30 | 1.37 | 0.040 | phenylpropanoid |
| GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) | 7451 | 5457 | 1.37 | 0.050 | amino acid |
| shikimic acid | 6025 | 4626 | 1.30 | 0.423 | organic acid |
| campesterol | 54 | 43 | 1.26 | 0.078 | sterol |
| 4- | 28 | 23 | 1.23 | 0.405 | phenylpropanoid |
| quinic acid | 2716 | 2670 | 1.02 | 0.932 | organic acid |
| sinapic acid | 4 | 6 | 0.78 | 0.075 | phenylpropanoid |
| 5- | 134 | 185 | 0.72 | 0.050 | phenylpropanoid |
| 19.14 572 498 483 | 2 | 2 | 0.70 | 0.001 | N/A |
| 5-hydroxyconiferyl alcohol | 1 | 1 | 0.68 | 0.001 | phenylpropanoid |
| ferulic acid | 26 | 42 | 0.61 | 0.001 | phenylpropanoid |
| sinapyl alcohol | 6 | 10 | 0.58 | 0.004 | phenylpropanoid |
| sucrose | 3600 | 6212 | 0.58 | 0.226 | sugar - disaccharide |
| 4- | 98 | 173 | 0.57 | 0.013 | phenylpropanoid |
| 12.88 553 463 373 283 | 27 | 49 | 0.56 | 0.001 | N/A |
| coniferaldehyde | 1 | 1 | 0.53 | 0.006 | phenylpropanoid |
| 102 | 236 | 0.43 | 0.000 | phenylpropanoid | |
| 3- | 171 | 413 | 0.41 | 0.007 | phenylpropanoid |
| 16.32 327 syringyl lignan | 227 | 562 | 0.41 | 0.000 | lignan |
| coniferyl alcohol | 4 | 12 | 0.36 | 0.000 | phenylpropanoid |
| 16.11 327 297 syringyl lignan | 23 | 66 | 0.35 | 0.002 | lignan |
| 16.76 354 482 439 323 297 lignan | 1 | 3 | 0.32 | 0.000 | lignan |
| syringin | 3 | 10 | 0.31 | 0.000 | phenylpropanoid |
| 16.82 354 456 203 188 | 0 | 1 | 0.30 | 0.002 | N/A |
| 16.06 297 guaiacyl lignan | 644 | 2184 | 0.30 | 0.000 | lignan |
| 9.99 275 | 1 | 4 | 0.20 | 0.000 | N/A |
| 4 | 23 | 0.18 | 0.000 | phenylpropanoid | |
| guaiacylglycerol | 45 | 287 | 0.16 | 0.000 | phenylpropanoid |
| 15.84 412 323 297 209 lignan | 29 | 207 | 0.14 | 0.000 | lignan |
| 15.12 518 shikimic acid conjugate | 0 | 2 | 0.13 | 0.001 | organic acid |
| 16.62 486 576 546 456 209 lignan | 9 | 72 | 0.13 | 0.000 | lignan |
Unidentified and tentatively identified metabolites are designated by retention time (RT; min) and key mass-to-charge (m/z) ratios, with the first designated m/z extracted for relative quantification.
Figure 2Correlations between lignin content, wall-bound phenolics and SSF ethanol yield. (a) The content of ester-linked, ether-linked and total wall-bound p-coumaric and ferulic acids in the cell wall residues (CWR) of switchgrass whole tillers. (b) Lignin composition of control and PvMYB4-OX switchgrass whole tillers determined by thioacidolysis. Ctrl: control lines; S, syringyl unit; G, guaiacyl unit; H, p-hydroxyphenyl unit. (c-f) Correlations with SSF ethanol yield without pretreatment. (c) lignin content. (d) wall-bound p-coumaric acid. (e) ether-lined ferulic acid. (f) wall-bound p-CA/FA ratio. All data are means ± SE (n = 3). The letters indicates significant differences of total lignin content at the p < 0.05 level. Mean comparisons, based on mean separation test results, cannot be compared across variables in Figure 2a.
Figure 3Cell wall extractabilities and characteristics determined by solid-stateC CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy. (a) Cell wall integrity of whole biomass or cell wall residues (CWR) determined by the percentage of mass lost under different extraction conditions. 0.1M NaOH, 0.1 M NaOH extraction overnight at 5°C after 91-92% methanol extraction overnight at 5°C. 2M NaOH: extraction of ester-linked wall-bound phenolics from CWR. *Asterisks indicate values that were determined by the Student t-test to be significantly different from their equivalent control (p < 0.05). All data are means ± SE (n = 3). (b-d) Solid-state 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra of CWRs of control (2A) and PvMYB4-OX (1C) biomass that had been extracted with methanol (b), 0.1M NaOH (c) or 2M NaOH (d). Whole biomass, non-extracted biomass from the whole tillers. CWR, cell wall residues of the whole biomass extracted by methanol: chloroform, methanol, methanol: H2O and H2O.
Figure 4Partial HSQC spectra showing the side-chain C-H correlations from the three main linkages (--4-, -5-, and -) in lignins and presence of wall-associated fucose. (a) Partial HSQC spectra of isolated lignins. The carbon positions in aromatic ring and side-chain are labeled on the molecular structures of the A, B and C types of linkages. The insert table shows the relative content of different linkage types. (b) Partial 2D HSQC NMR analysis of gel-state CWR showing increased wall-associated fucose in PvMYB-OX. Red, control 2A. Blue, PvMYB4-OX.
Figure 5Glycome profiling heatmaps of specific cell wall extracts showing areas that are highlighted in Additional file 1,with indication of antibodies. The white, blue, yellow and green colored boxes highlighted in Additional file 1 are enlarged in (a-d) to show differences in antibody binding signals. (e) Heatmap scale. The black, blue, red and yellow colors indicate the binding intensities of groups of plant glycan-directed monoclonal antibodies (with black color depicting no binding and bright yellow depicting strongest binding) that are selective for the different cell wall polysaccharides as labeled on the right-hand side of the figure.