Literature DB >> 27770231

The targeting of starch binding domains from starch synthase III to the cell wall alters cell wall composition and properties.

Mauricio J Grisolia1, Diego A Peralta1, Hugo A Valdez2,3, Julieta Barchiesi1, Diego F Gomez-Casati1,2, María V Busi4,5.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Starch binding domains of starch synthase III from Arabidopsis thaliana (SBD123) binds preferentially to cell wall polysaccharides rather than to starch in vitro. Transgenic plants overexpressing SBD123 in the cell wall are larger than wild type. Cell wall components are altered in transgenic plants. Transgenic plants are more susceptible to digestion than wild type and present higher released glucose content. Our results suggest that the transgenic plants have an advantage for the production of bioethanol in terms of saccharification of essential substrates. The plant cell wall, which represents a major source of biomass for biofuel production, is composed of cellulose, hemicelluloses, pectins and lignin. A potential biotechnological target for improving the production of biofuels is the modification of plant cell walls. This modification is achieved via several strategies, including, among others, altering biosynthetic pathways and modifying the associations and structures of various cell wall components. In this study, we modified the cell wall of A. thaliana by targeting the starch-binding domains of A. thaliana starch synthase III to this structure. The resulting transgenic plants (E8-SDB123) showed an increased biomass, higher levels of both fermentable sugars and hydrolyzed cellulose and altered cell wall properties such as higher laxity and degradability, which are valuable characteristics for the second-generation biofuels industry. The increased biomass and degradability phenotype of E8-SBD123 plants could be explained by the putative cell-wall loosening effect of the in tandem starch binding domains. Based on these results, our approach represents a promising biotechnological tool for reducing of biomass recalcitrance and therefore, the need for pretreatments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell extension; Cell wall; Cell wall digestibility; Fermentable sugars; Starch binding domains

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27770231     DOI: 10.1007/s11103-016-0551-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Mol Biol        ISSN: 0167-4412            Impact factor:   4.076


  65 in total

1.  Growth stage-based phenotypic analysis of Arabidopsis: a model for high throughput functional genomics in plants.

Authors:  D C Boyes; A M Zayed; R Ascenzi; A J McCaskill; N E Hoffman; K R Davis; J Görlach
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  Recent developments in understanding the regulation of starch metabolism in higher plants.

Authors:  Ian J Tetlow; Matthew K Morell; Michael J Emes
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 6.992

3.  Overexpression of the carbohydrate binding module of strawberry expansin2 in Arabidopsis thaliana modifies plant growth and cell wall metabolism.

Authors:  Cristina F Nardi; Natalia M Villarreal; Franco R Rossi; Santiago Martínez; Gustavo A Martínez; Pedro M Civello
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis.

Authors:  Sang-Dong Yoo; Young-Hee Cho; Jen Sheen
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  The starch-binding capacity of the noncatalytic SBD2 region and the interaction between the N- and C-terminal domains are involved in the modulation of the activity of starch synthase III from Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Nahuel Z Wayllace; Hugo A Valdez; Rodolfo A Ugalde; Maria V Busi; Diego F Gomez-Casati
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 5.542

6.  New method for quantitative determination of uronic acids.

Authors:  N Blumenkrantz; G Asboe-Hansen
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 3.365

7.  Starch-synthase III family encodes a tandem of three starch-binding domains.

Authors:  Nicolás Palopoli; María Victoria Busi; María Silvina Fornasari; Diego Gomez-Casati; Rodolfo Ugalde; Gustavo Parisi
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-10-01

8.  Starch-binding domain affects catalysis in two Lactobacillus alpha-amylases.

Authors:  R Rodríguez-Sanoja; B Ruiz; J P Guyot; S Sanchez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  Starch synthesis in the cereal endosperm.

Authors:  Martha G James; Kay Denyer; Alan M Myers
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.834

Review 10.  Progress in metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Elke Nevoigt
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.056

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Crop resistant starch and genetic improvement: a review of recent advances.

Authors:  Jian Xia; Dong Zhu; Ruomei Wang; Yue Cui; Yueming Yan
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Gene Coexpression Network Analysis Indicates that Hub Genes Related to Photosynthesis and Starch Synthesis Modulate Salt Stress Tolerance in Ulmus pumila.

Authors:  Panfei Chen; Peng Liu; Quanfeng Zhang; Chenhao Bu; Chunhao Lu; Sudhakar Srivastava; Deqiang Zhang; Yuepeng Song
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  The PAP/SAL1 retrograde signaling pathway is involved in iron homeostasis.

Authors:  Manuel Balparda; Alejandro M Armas; Gonzalo M Estavillo; Hannetz Roschzttardtz; María A Pagani; Diego F Gomez-Casati
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 4.  Functional Roles of Starch Binding Domains and Surface Binding Sites in Enzymes Involved in Starch Biosynthesis.

Authors:  Casper Wilkens; Birte Svensson; Marie Sofie Møller
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.753

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.