Literature DB >> 23651118

C-reactive protein and leucocyte counts drop faster using the HeartShield® device in patients with DSWI.

Sandra Lindstedt1, Malin Malmsjö, Richard Ingemansson.   

Abstract

Right ventricular heart rupture is a devastating complication associated with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in cardiac surgery. The use of a rigid barrier disc (HeartShield™) has been suggested to offer protection against this lethal complication by preventing the heart from being drawn up by the negative pressure and damaged by the sharp sternum bone edges. Seven patients treated with conventional NPWT and seven patients treated with NPWT with a protective barrier disc (HeartShield) were compared with regard to bacterial clearance and infection parameters including C-reactive protein levels and leucocyte counts. C-reactive protein levels and leucocyte counts dropped faster and bacterial clearance occurred earlier in the HeartShield® group compared with the conventional NPWT group. Negative biopsy cultures were shown after 3·1 ± 0·4 NPWT dressing changes in the HeartShield group, and after 5·4 ± 0·6 NPWT dressing changes in the conventional NPWT group (P < 0·001). All patients were followed up with clinical check-up after 3 months. None of the patients in the HeartShield group had any signs of reinfection such as deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) or sternal fistulas, whereas in the conventional NPWT group, two patients had signs of sternal fistulas that demanded hospitalisation. HeartShield hinders the right ventricle to come into contact with the sharp sternal edges during NPWT and thereby protects from heart damage. This study shows that using HeartShield is beneficial in treating patients with DSWI. Improved wound healing by HeartShield may be a result of the efficient drainage of wound effluents from the thoracic cavity.
© 2013 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2013 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-reactive protein; Deep sternal wound infection; HeartShield®; Negative pressure therapy; Right ventricular rupture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23651118      PMCID: PMC7950387          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  24 in total

1.  The impact of vacuum-assisted closure on long-term survival after post-sternotomy mediastinitis.

Authors:  Johan Sjögren; Johan Nilsson; Ronny Gustafsson; Malin Malmsjö; Richard Ingemansson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Mechanisms governing the effects of vacuum-assisted closure in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Malin Malmsjö; Richard Ingemansson; Johan Sjögren
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Hemodynamic effects of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in cardiac surgery: assessment using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rainer Petzina; Martin Ugander; Lotta Gustafsson; Henrik Engblom; Johan Sjögren; Roland Hetzer; Richard Ingemansson; Håkan Arheden; Malin Malmsjö
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Effects on drainage of the mediastinum and pleura during negative pressure wound therapy when using a rigid barrier to prevent heart rupture.

Authors:  Sandra Lindstedt; Malin Malmsjö; Richard Ingemansson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Vacuum-assisted closure therapy guided by C-reactive protein level in patients with deep sternal wound infection.

Authors:  Ronny Gustafsson; Per Johnsson; Lars Algotsson; Sten Blomquist; Richard Ingemansson
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Haemodynamic effects of negative pressure wound therapy when using a rigid barrier to prevent heart rupture.

Authors:  Sandra Lindstedt; Richard Ingemansson; Malin Malmsjo
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Long-term results of flap reconstruction in median sternotomy wound infections.

Authors:  P R Ringelman; C A Vander Kolk; D Cameron; W A Baumgartner; P N Manson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Experience with Vacuum-assisted closure of sternal wound infections following cardiac surgery and evaluation of chronic complications associated with its use.

Authors:  Vinayak Bapat; Naguib El-Muttardi; Christopher Young; Graham Venn; James Roxburgh
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.620

9.  Evaluation of vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of poststernotomy mediastinitis.

Authors:  Patrick W Domkowski; Monica L Smith; Denis L Gonyon; Carol Drye; Mary Kay Wooten; L Scott Levin; Walter G Wolfe
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Algorithm for primary closure in sternal wound infection: a single institution 10-year experience.

Authors:  Alain Jean Poncelet; Benoit Lengele; Bénédicte Delaere; Francis Zech; David Glineur; Jean-Christophe Funken; Gebrine El Khoury; Philippe Noirhomme
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 4.191

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Duration of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Can Be Reduced Using the HeartShield Device in Patients With Deep Sternal Wound Infection.

Authors:  Richard Ingemansson; Malin Malmsjö; Sandra Lindstedt
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-04-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.