Literature DB >> 23650483

Developing a tool to assess the quality of socio-demographic data in community health centres.

M Laberge1, A Shachak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study are to 1) create a quality assessment tool for socio-demographic data aligned with the needs of Community Health Centres (CHCs) and based on the data quality framework of the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), and 2) test the feasibility of the tool in CHCs.
METHODS: The tool was developed based on both theoretical and practical knowledge. A review of the literature was performed to identify data quality frameworks and dimensions that could be employed. In addition, informal discussions with Community Health Centres staff members holding various positions were conducted and a team of subject matter experts was established. This approach supported the alignment between the tool (i.e., the indicators developed, the rating scale, and weighting system) and the setting for which it has been designed. The tool was pilot tested in five CHCs across Ontario.
RESULTS: The decision to focus on socio-demographic data was based on findings from the discussions with staff members. The team established nine principles for the development of the tool, including the use of computer software, whenever possible, to query the data and ensure consistency of the measurement. Data quality scores ranged from 45 to 74 on a scale of 0 (lowest quality) to 100 (highest data quality), with one CHC that was not able to run all of the queries. The feedback from staff was positive and supports the feasibility of the tool as an application of the CIHI data quality framework in a local setting.
CONCLUSION: Pilot test results demonstrate the feasibility of the tool and an applicability of the CIHI framework as a basis for developing tools for data quality assessment in health care organizations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data quality; assessment; electronic health records; primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23650483      PMCID: PMC3644810          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2012-10-CR-0041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  16 in total

1.  Enhancing performance measurement: NCQA's road map for a health information framework. National Committee for Quality Assurance.

Authors:  E C Schneider; V Riehl; S Courte-Wienecke; D M Eddy; C Sennett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Sep 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic framework.

Authors:  Danielle G T Arts; Nicolette F De Keizer; Gert-Jan Scheffer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care.

Authors:  Krish Thiru; Alan Hassey; Frank Sullivan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-17

4.  Connecting information to improve health.

Authors:  W Ed Hammond; Christopher Bailey; Philippe Boucher; Mark Spohr; Patrick Whitaker
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Stimulating the adoption of health information technology.

Authors:  David Blumenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  [Review of data quality dimensions and applied methods in the evaluation of health information systems].

Authors:  Claudia Risso de Araujo Lima; Joyce Mendes de Andrade Schramm; Claudia Medina Coeli; Márcia Elizabeth Marinho da Silva
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.632

7.  Can general practice data be used for needs assessment and health care planning in an inner-London district?

Authors:  S Scobie; I Basnett; P McCartney
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1995-12

Review 8.  Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records.

Authors:  W R Hogan; M M Wagner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Improving the quality of industry and occupation data at a central cancer registry.

Authors:  Karla R Armenti; Maria O Celaya; Sai Cherala; Bruce Riddle; Pamela K Schumacher; Judy R Rees
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Use of an electronic medical record improves the quality of urban pediatric primary care.

Authors:  William G Adams; Adriana M Mann; Howard Bauchner
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  3 in total

1.  Data Quality Assessment in Emergency Medical Services: What Are the Stakeholders' Perspectives?

Authors:  Mehrnaz Mashoufi; Haleh Ayatollahi; And Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2019-01-01

2.  A basic model for assessing primary health care electronic medical record data quality.

Authors:  Amanda L Terry; Moira Stewart; Sonny Cejic; J Neil Marshall; Simon de Lusignan; Bert M Chesworth; Vijaya Chevendra; Heather Maddocks; Joshua Shadd; Fred Burge; Amardeep Thind
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  The quality of social determinants data in the electronic health record: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lily A Cook; Jonathan Sachs; Nicole G Weiskopf
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.497

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.