Literature DB >> 23650327

Achieving health care cost containment through provider payment reform that engages patients and providers.

Paul B Ginsburg1.   

Abstract

The best opportunity to pursue cost containment in the next five to ten years is through reforming provider payment to gradually diminish the role of fee-for-service reimbursement. Public and private payers have launched many promising payment reform pilots aimed at blending fee-for-service with payment approaches based on broader units of care, such as an episode or patients' total needs over a period of time, a crucial first step. But meaningful cost containment from payment reform will not be achieved until Medicare and Medicaid establish stronger incentives for providers to contract in this way, with discouragement of nonparticipation increasing over time. In addition, the models need to evolve to engage beneficiaries, perhaps through incentives for patients to enroll in an accountable care organization and to seek care within that organization's network of providers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Business Of Health; Cost Of Health Care; Health Economics; Health Spending; Physician Payment

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23650327     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  9 in total

1.  Using Publicly Available Data to Construct a Transparent Measure of Health Care Value: A Method and Initial Results.

Authors:  William B Weeks; Gregory R Kotzbauer; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  A qualitative study of choosing home health care after hospitalization: the unintended consequences of 'patient choice' requirements.

Authors:  Rosa R Baier; Andrea Wysocki; Stefan Gravenstein; Emily Cooper; Vincent Mor; Melissa Clark
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Oncologist Support for Consolidated Payments for Cancer Care Management in the United States.

Authors:  Siva Narayanan; Emily Hautamaki
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2016-07

4.  Getting the next version of payment policy "right" on the road toward accountable cancer care.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Andrew J Epstein; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Episode-of-Care Characteristics and Costs for Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery in Hospitals Belonging to the High Value Healthcare Collaborative Compared With Similar Hospitals in the Same Health Care Markets.

Authors:  William B Weeks; William J Schoellkopf; David J Ballard; Gary S Kaplan; Brent James; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Healthcare reform in the United States and China: pharmaceutical market implications.

Authors:  Arthur Daemmrich; Ansuman Mohanty
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2014-07-14

7.  Consumer Engagement in Health IT: Distinguishing Rhetoric from Reality.

Authors:  Marsha Gold; Mynti Hossain; Amy Mangum
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2015-11-23

Review 8.  Does a provider payment method affect membership retention in a health insurance scheme? a mixed method study of Ghana's capitation payment for primary care.

Authors:  Francis-Xavier Andoh-Adjei; Renske van der Wal; Eric Nsiah-Boateng; Felix Ankomah Asante; Koos van der Velden; Ernst Spaan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  The effects of patient cost sharing on inpatient utilization, cost, and outcome.

Authors:  Yuan Xu; Ning Li; Mingshan Lu; Elijah Dixon; Robert P Myers; Rachel J Jolley; Hude Quan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.