Literature DB >> 23648947

An acute change in lung allocation score and survival after lung transplantation: a cohort study.

Wayne M Tsuang1, David M Vock1, C Ashley Finlen Copeland1, David J Lederer1, Scott M Palmer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is an effective treatment for patients with advanced lung disease. In the United States, lungs are allocated on the basis of the lung allocation score (LAS), a composite measure of transplantation urgency and utility. Clinical deteriorations result in increases to the LAS; however, whether the trajectory of the LAS has prognostic significance is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an acute increase in the LAS before lung transplantation is associated with reduced posttransplant survival.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of adult lung transplant recipients listed for at least 30 days between 4 May 2005 (LAS implementation) and 31 December 2010 in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. An acute increase in the LAS was defined as an LAS change (LASΔ) greater than 5 units between the 30 days before and the time of transplantation. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the relationship between an LASΔ >5 and posttransplant graft survival.
SETTING: All U.S. lung transplantation centers. PATIENTS: 5749 lung transplant recipients. MEASUREMENTS: Survival time after lung transplantation.
RESULTS: 702 (12.2%) patients experienced an LASΔ >5. These patients had significantly worse posttransplant survival (hazard ratio, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.11 to 1.54]; P = 0.001]) after adjustment for the LAS at transplantation (LAS-T) and other clinical covariates. The effect of an LASΔ >5 was independent of the LAS-T, underlying diagnosis, center volume, or donor characteristics. LIMITATION: Analysis was based on center-reported data.
CONCLUSION: An acute increase in LAS before transplantation is associated with posttransplant survival after adjustment for LAS-T. Further emphasis on serial assessment of the LAS could improve the ability to offer accurate prediction of survival after transplantation. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23648947      PMCID: PMC3819715          DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-9-201305070-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  29 in total

Review 1.  Lung transplantation.

Authors:  S M Arcasoy; R M Kotloff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Predicting survival among patients listed for liver transplantation: an assessment of serial MELD measurements.

Authors:  Kiran Bambha; W Ray Kim; Walter K Kremers; Terry M Therneau; Patrick S Kamath; Russell Wiesner; Charles B Rosen; Jeff Thostenson; Joanne T Benson; E Rolland Dickson
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Propensity score matching with time-dependent covariates.

Authors:  Bo Lu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Special considerations for patients with cystic fibrosis undergoing lung transplantation.

Authors:  Denis Hadjiliadis
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  A sequential stratification method for estimating the effect of a time-dependent experimental treatment in observational studies.

Authors:  Douglas E Schaubel; Robert A Wolfe; Friedrich K Port
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview.

Authors:  A R Localio; J A Berlin; T R Ten Have; S E Kimmel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Development of the new lung allocation system in the United States.

Authors:  T M Egan; S Murray; R T Bustami; T H Shearon; K P McCullough; L B Edwards; M A Coke; E R Garrity; S C Sweet; D A Heiney; F L Grover
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Lung allocation score for lung transplantation: impact on disease severity and survival.

Authors:  Cynthia J Gries; Michael S Mulligan; Jeffrey D Edelman; Ganesh Raghu; J Randall Curtis; Christopher H Goss
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  The impact of the lung allocation score on short-term transplantation outcomes: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Benjamin D Kozower; Bryan F Meyers; Michael A Smith; Nilto C De Oliveira; Stephen D Cassivi; Tracey J Guthrie; Honkung Wang; Beverly J Ryan; K Robert Shen; Thomas M Daniel; David R Jones
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Longitudinal assessment of mortality risk among candidates for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Robert M Merion; Robert A Wolfe; Dawn M Dykstra; Alan B Leichtman; Brenda Gillespie; Philip J Held
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.799

View more
  14 in total

1.  Update in lung transplantation 2013.

Authors:  Jamie L Todd; Jason D Christie; Scott M Palmer
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Body composition and mortality after adult lung transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Jonathan P Singer; Eric R Peterson; Mark E Snyder; Patricia P Katz; Jeffrey A Golden; Frank D'Ovidio; Matthew Bacchetta; Joshua R Sonett; Jasleen Kukreja; Lori Shah; Hilary Robbins; Kristin Van Horn; Rupal J Shah; Joshua M Diamond; Nancy Wickersham; Li Sun; Steven Hays; Selim M Arcasoy; Scott M Palmer; Lorraine B Ware; Jason D Christie; David J Lederer
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Differential outcomes with early and late repeat transplantation in the era of the lung allocation score.

Authors:  Asishana A Osho; Anthony W Castleberry; Laurie D Snyder; Scott M Palmer; Asvin M Ganapathi; Sameer A Hirji; Shu S Lin; R Duane Davis; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Assessing the accuracy of the lung allocation score.

Authors:  William F Parker; Nicole E Dussault; Renea Jablonski; Edward R Garrity; Matthew M Churpek
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 13.569

5.  Estimating restricted mean treatment effects with stacked survival models.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; David M Vock; John Connett; Kyle Rudser
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Impact of the lung allocation score on survival beyond 1 year.

Authors:  B G Maxwell; J E Levitt; B A Goldstein; J J Mooney; M R Nicolls; M Zamora; V Valentine; D Weill; G S Dhillon
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Utilization and Cost Analysis of Lung Transplantation and Survival After 10 Years of Adapting the Lung Allocation Score.

Authors:  Cesar A Keller; Thomas A Gonwa; Launia J White; March E Rucci; Sue L Visscher; Cassie C Kennedy; Richard C Daly; James M Naessens
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Use of expanded-criteria donors and > 85 KDPI kidneys for pediatric kidney transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Sarah J Kizilbash; Michael D Evans; Srinath Chinnakotla; Blanche M Chavers
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Survival Benefit of Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplantation in Children Compared With Remaining on the Waiting List for a Kidney Donated After Brain Death.

Authors:  Sarah J Kizilbash; Michael D Evans; Blanche M Chavers
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 5.385

10.  Dynamic logistic state space prediction model for clinical decision making.

Authors:  Jiakun Jiang; Wei Yang; Erin M Schnellinger; Stephen E Kimmel; Wensheng Guo
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 1.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.